


<font size=1>[ This Message was edited by: pikkrong on Oct 18, 2002 4:38pm ]</font>
Checked this with 'the sources close to' and it his definitely him...Methedrome wrote:Does anyone actually believe this is legitimately Craig Adams? Seems like a bootlegger's farce to me...
If it's ceremonial Magick that'll be "Yod He Vav He"; the tetragrammaton or four-letter name of God (transliterated YHVH whence Yahweh or Jehovah.)Dan wrote:Whose name is written with the four letters
(?)jod E bav E(?)
spot on!markfiend wrote:If it's ceremonial Magick that'll be "Yod He Vav He"; the tetragrammaton or four-letter name of God (transliterated YHVH whence Yahweh or Jehovah.)Dan wrote:Whose name is written with the four letters
(?)jod E bav E(?)
Reviving a cold thread, I can tell you with absolute certainty that that is not Craig Adams.JansenClone wrote:Checked this with 'the sources close to' and it his definitely him...Methedrome wrote:Does anyone actually believe this is legitimately Craig Adams? Seems like a bootlegger's farce to me...
None taken, but I wasn't joking when I said that I could say with absolute certainty that that isn't Craig on the track. My source is better than sources close to Craig.markfiend wrote:No offence, but when JansenClone says it is Craig, I would believe him over you.
If you mean "I happened to speak to Craig about it once and he said it wasn't him" then that's fine and I believe you. But why not just say that?ianmacd wrote:My source is better than sources close to Craig.
That's OK, though. I'm not offended if you don't believe me. If anything, it only adds to the amusement.
Cheers,
Ian
Maybe it's better than that. Maybe be is Craig!lazarus corporation wrote:If you mean "I happened to speak to Craig about it once and he said it wasn't him" then that's fine and I believe you. But why not just say that?ianmacd wrote:My source is better than sources close to Craig.
That's OK, though. I'm not offended if you don't believe me. If anything, it only adds to the amusement.
Cheers,
Ian
"My source is better than sources close to Craig" sounds like a self-aggrandizing line from a bad spy movie.
Well, even if Craig had told me that, I'd still only have his word for it, right?lazarus corporation wrote:If you mean "I happened to speak to Craig about it once and he said it wasn't him" then that's fine and I believe you. But why not just say that?
Forgive my being cryptic. It's just that, after more than a quarter of a century of the myth persisting, I'm fully aware that I might not be believed when I reveal the truth."My source is better than sources close to Craig" sounds like a self-aggrandizing line from a bad spy movie.