rolling stone mag
@ Dr
couldn't agree more mate
when i first got access to the net, not too surprisingly one of the first sites i checked out was the official sisters site.
couldn’t believe how poor it was. Then about a year ago?, along pops a brand new shiny site. Oh goody i thinks, regular info for me stuck on the rock, but NO!!! after about a year of waiting for summer et al.....
Sorry, but as an extension of the way the sisters think, the site is cool
but as a medium for communicating with the bands fan base.............absolute carp, which is both sad and annoying
when you see how the likes of the mish, siouxsie etc go about letting people know what's going on, it is a very long way away from the mark and quite frankly all this intellectual bollocks it hides behind is not IMHO good enough
END RANT MODE
couldn't agree more mate
when i first got access to the net, not too surprisingly one of the first sites i checked out was the official sisters site.
couldn’t believe how poor it was. Then about a year ago?, along pops a brand new shiny site. Oh goody i thinks, regular info for me stuck on the rock, but NO!!! after about a year of waiting for summer et al.....
Sorry, but as an extension of the way the sisters think, the site is cool
but as a medium for communicating with the bands fan base.............absolute carp, which is both sad and annoying
when you see how the likes of the mish, siouxsie etc go about letting people know what's going on, it is a very long way away from the mark and quite frankly all this intellectual bollocks it hides behind is not IMHO good enough
END RANT MODE
and you won't make me jealous
And who is this "Andrew Eldridge" of whom they speak?EricSweden wrote:http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/def ... &afl=mamma
S.