![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/22/dixons_vcr/
Weirdo!d00mw0lf wrote:The top one looks far cooler
It's Classy. Like all that lovley black vaneer wood furnature in my roomJames Blast wrote:Weirdo!d00mw0lf wrote:The top one looks far cooler
Yeah good point. I got a VHS copy of "Amadeus" that the sound is so quiet on, even at full volume on the TV you can barely hear it. And of course then you forget you had the TV at full volume, switch the video off and deafen yourselfRivers wrote:Watching some of the movies I paid £10 for a few years back on VHS now makes me think that we were ripped off by the awful quality. Some movies were nice sharp transfers, such as Jurassic Park: The Lost World but others such as Dark City are shamefull. It was smeary and blurred when it was new.
Dig that grave, give me a shovel.
Spiggy's hat wrote:You have served us well, and for that we salute you.![]()
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/22/dixons_vcr/
I think you've hit the nail on the head there.allfear wrote:I think this is more that the DVD manufactures dont want people owning recordings of the telly but prefer to sell tv programmes on DVD.
Heh, heh, that's probably about the amount of tape we chucked the other week in an attempt to "dejunk" our houseallfear wrote:Im gonna sound really nerdy but I have ...oh and about 1200 video tapes!
I think the manufactures are jumping the gun slightly, as DVD recordsers are still in there infancy with compatibility problems, and some of them especally phillips dont work properly!
I think this is more that the DVD manufactures dont want people owning recordings of the telly but prefer to sell tv programmes on DVD.
Matt