Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
nodubmanshouts wrote:At our place, surfing the net, playing videogames, playing pool (we have a table), going to the gym and 2 hour lunch breaks are all okay (I kid you not).
Work related stress? Unheard of.
But you make sure you get the job done, and if you're doing any of the above, make sure you're total hours add up.
Its a shame that more companys don't realise that if you treat your employees well, they're healthier and more inclined to pay back the favor.
And where is it you work, I've nearly finishe my degree, and am currently looking for graduate places...
lets starts a new campaign! Get Gary a cool job! oh I want lots of money to!
the workaround slips past 'Webmarshall' it's the all out c**t about that gets flagged up with the 'Pornography Alert!'
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
Although I guess the workaround does still embed html tags when it's decoded by the phpBB script?
So it wouldn't be picked out by a script looking for character-strings in the downloaded source code, because an empty pair of html tags would be in the middle of the rude word.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
Although I guess the workaround does still embed html tags when it's decoded by the phpBB script?
So it wouldn't be picked out by a script looking for character-strings in the downloaded source code, because an empty pair of html tags would be in the middle of the rude word.
sounds about right.
i'm glad its not ust phpBB that cant see that, but all those powerful (and expensive) web filtering systems too
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
Although I guess the workaround does still embed html tags when it's decoded by the phpBB script?
So it wouldn't be picked out by a script looking for character-strings in the downloaded source code, because an empty pair of html tags would be in the middle of the rude word.
sounds about right.
i'm glad its not ust phpBB that cant see that, but all those powerful (and expensive) web filtering systems too
A properly written regex would be able to pick them up.