Jacko - innocent

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
User avatar
Almiche V
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 23 Apr 2003, 21:01
Location: Outta sight

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050613/325/fl22l.html

Good.

But nowt so queer as folk. To put it lightly.
To not know and to ask a question is a moment of embarrassment; to not know and not ask is a lifetime of shame.
User avatar
Ocean Moves
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 582
Joined: 08 Nov 2004, 19:22
Location: Australia

So, life's "back to Normal" for the guy then ?
:lol:
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Just like OJ...

Money talks and Jackson walks. :urff: Bullsh1t.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
boudicca
Sister Midnight
Posts: 7427
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 16:15
Location: embrace the margin
Contact:

I don't know what to think. On the one hand, if he is innocent, then he's a victim of something no-one deserves. On the other, if he's guilty, he's a f**king dangerous man.

Meh.

I liked that lady who kept releasing doves outside the court though! He fairly brings the nutters out of the woodwork, you've got to hand it to him... :lol:
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16772
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

innocent or guilty, his behaviour towards minors is still grossly inapproriate, as has been his general conduct and lack of respect during the trial.

its just a shame that he's so detached from reality that this won't have been the reality check he so badly needs :|
Last edited by Quiff Boy on 14 Jun 2005, 12:06, edited 1 time in total.
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
Almiche V
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 23 Apr 2003, 21:01
Location: Outta sight

I think it would have to be a pretty hefty check unfortunately QB.
To not know and to ask a question is a moment of embarrassment; to not know and not ask is a lifetime of shame.
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Quiff Boy wrote:innocent or guilty, his behaviour towards minors is still grossly inapproriate, as has been his general conduct and lack of respect during the trial.

its just a shame that he's so detached from reality that this won't have been the reality check he so badly needs :|
I think it's a shame that a jury didn't dare convict him just because he's someone famous.

Face it, anyone else who had admitted sharing a bed with under-age boys would not be seeing daylight for a long time.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
mik
Chameleons Guru
Posts: 251
Joined: 30 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Bit of a surprise really.

I was rather perplexed by the jurors reasons for aquitting had a lot to do with the lack of (physical) evidence and in the end it came down to believing one person over another.

Child abuse cases rarely have any evidence, except where photos and video of the abuse was taken for later 'pleasure', as the abusers go to extreme lengths to make sure there isn't any, and the abuse is inherently secretive in nature and the victimes often unaware until many years later of the significance of what happened, by which time the shame sets in and the 'deniability' by both parties becomes the significant factor.

Having admitted to sharing a bed with the child in question, and to have watched hard core pornography with him, I'm not sure how much more evidence of intent the jurors required.

Obviously more than I would have done but there you are.

What's the betting on an OJ type civil trial to follow where guilt is on the basis of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt ?
Something pithy.
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

mik wrote:What's the betting on an OJ type civil trial to follow where guilt is on the basis of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt ?
Highly probable IMO. It was already being touted round as a possibility weeks ago IIRC.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4962
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

they saved the best till last

oh, i'm bad :twisted:

TTFN
Goths have feelings too
User avatar
Delilah
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 819
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:45

He looks like w weirdo and behaves like a weirdo... Especially after the Balcony and the baby incident... Sorry... but maybe his children's mum should think about getting the custody anyway?
User avatar
boudicca
Sister Midnight
Posts: 7427
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 16:15
Location: embrace the margin
Contact:

He's surrounded by yes-men (and women, and um... probably children as well, oh and monkeys), that's his problem.

That baby over the balcony incident was just incredibly sad, I thought. What is going to happen to those kids? Walking around in veils and conceived by a turkey baster. :urff: I hope for their sake he doesn't go bankrupt because I imagine the shrink's bill will be pretty high. :roll:
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
User avatar
Batfish
Road Kill
Posts: 67
Joined: 09 Feb 2005, 08:31

They'd have locked him up if he was black. :innocent:
User avatar
canon docre
Overbomber
Posts: 2529
Joined: 05 Mar 2005, 21:10
Location: Mother Prussia

Batfish wrote:They'd have locked him up if he was black. :innocent:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Put their heads on f*cking pikes in front of the venue for all I care.
User avatar
Almiche V
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 23 Apr 2003, 21:01
Location: Outta sight

boudicca wrote:That baby over the balcony incident was just incredibly sad, I thought.
I remember my dad dangling me over tower bridge. Put hairs on me chest.
To not know and to ask a question is a moment of embarrassment; to not know and not ask is a lifetime of shame.
User avatar
boudicca
Sister Midnight
Posts: 7427
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 16:15
Location: embrace the margin
Contact:

Almiche V wrote:
boudicca wrote:That baby over the balcony incident was just incredibly sad, I thought.
I remember my dad dangling me over tower bridge. Put hairs on me chest.
Character-building eh? :lol:

Well, then you're a case in point. Would you say you are a well-adjusted individual? :innocent: :P
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
User avatar
Almiche V
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 23 Apr 2003, 21:01
Location: Outta sight

boudicca wrote: Character-building eh? :lol:

Well, then you're a case in point. Would you say you are a well-adjusted individual? :innocent: :P
Heh heh. I'm ok and like to do it on trampolines with a watery base. It's everybody else y'see.
To not know and to ask a question is a moment of embarrassment; to not know and not ask is a lifetime of shame.
User avatar
christophe
Overbomber
Posts: 3527
Joined: 17 Jan 2004, 09:42
Location: Grinderstreet

true or not: Unguilty is the verdict. and that is what he is for me.
I'm sure he is a nutcase and whatever his motives for his strang acts are I'm sure as hell he is a perfect target for lawyers and others after money or fame....

though - as a parent I wouldn't let my children that close to any celeberty/person like happend here.
Another Shade of You.
User avatar
Brideoffrankenstein
Overbomber
Posts: 2883
Joined: 15 Jan 2004, 01:51

I could never decide if I thought he was guilty or innocent and I almost felt a bit sorry for him at one point. I really don't know what I think about this to be honest :urff:
User avatar
Andrew S
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1820
Joined: 05 May 2002, 01:00
Location: Glasgow

Brideoffrankenstein wrote:I could never decide if I thought he was guilty or innocent and I almost felt a bit sorry for him at one point. I really don't know what I think about this to be honest :urff:
I'm not sure either. I think there's been a lot of witchhunting and I don't honestly think he's been kiddyfiddling as such. He seemed genuinely outraged and disgusted when Martin Bashir suggested that he did, but I suppose it's quite possible that he's so deluded that he could abuse and be in total denial about it. Still, the way he relates to children is possibly equally damaging to them, and in doing so he sets himself up for a lot of grief time and time again. I don't understand how he can't see how screwed up it is to fawn all over children (particularly the cuter little boys), have his favourites living with him for weeks on end pretending life is one long slumber party, and then presumeably drop them like hot potatoes once they reach their sell-by dates. He's too damaged to see what he's doing, let alone change his behaviour. And the leeches and sycophants he attracts aren't going to risk a good source of income (or a lawsuit) for a reality check, no matter how much needed.
User avatar
The Pope
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 233
Joined: 28 May 2004, 01:07

I think he's really screwed up from his childhood (or lackthereof) and from whatever drugs he's taken/is on. His life has never really been realistic so I can undertand to a certain extent why he doesn't have a hold on things realistically ie he doesnt know "right" from "wrong," or at least this society's definition of it since he's never had to. Whether or not he did do everything or anything, I don't think he's a threat to society. I'm not afraid of him sneaking into my room at night or raping me in some alley. "Plying with alcohol" and "lewd touching" of minors...whatever.

I don't think he's your average everyday celebrity, either. He's in a category of his own in my opinion and no one else that I can think of has such a history and life as he and the fact that his whole life has more or less been made public can't be ignored. One reason for trials is to look at something on an individual basis and this is no exception.
User avatar
Padstar
Utterly Bastard Smurph
Posts: 1800
Joined: 26 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Purplerainsville, UK
Contact:

Quiff Boy wrote:innocent or guilty, his behaviour towards minors is still grossly inapproriate, as has been his general conduct and lack of respect during the trial.

its just a shame that he's so detached from reality that this won't have been the reality check he so badly needs :|
Ditto. I think he possibly is guilty as charged, i just wonder if he even realises whats right or wrong anymore as he lives in a bubble where i think its fair to say that normal social laws dont have to apply. I think what hes admitted to proves that.

So hard though as if he is innocent then as has also been said no-one deserves it.... but aS Quiff says "grossly inapproriate" is the order of the day.

Paddy
Still playing guitar - sometimes weird shaped ones.
User avatar
Eva
Intercontinental Assassin
Posts: 1196
Joined: 26 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Zureich

No matter wether he's guilty or not, I'm with Christophe on this one: As a parent I'd NEVER let my child join such a "party". Did they get paid to have their children be with Jacko or what? How sick is this? And what did they expect of an adult who prefers to spend his time with little boys instead of adult people?
You can't fix stupid.
User avatar
RicheyJames
Bad Tempered Young Man
Posts: 1098
Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
Location: far beyond the pale

one of the jurors wrote:I feel that Michael Jackson probably has molested boys. But that doesn't make him guilty of the charges that were presented in this case - and that's where we had to make our decision.
just about sums it up for me. amazing that the prosecution let it go to trial without a watertight case but i guess that's what happens when the only people prepared to speak out come across as money-grabbing trailer trash.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
User avatar
Silver_Owl
The Don
Posts: 7498
Joined: 27 Sep 2003, 18:52

Let the babysitting resume.
We forgive as we forget
As the day is long.
Post Reply