Batman is so much cooler than Superman

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
User avatar
Rosalie
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 21:17

I mean really, Superman is a bit rubbish. I know he's the first superhero and all that, but it's not exactly a *hard* concept or one that wouldn't have emerged anyway, all they did is take mythological superheroes and put a cape on them. In fact, if anything, Superman is responsible for many of the things that are *wrong* with earlier comics.

Batman, on the other hand, is much cooler. With the exception of that s**t movie with "Mista Fwreeeeze" he is for the most part a much better developed character, darker instead of camp. He has cool gadgets, and despite being spoiled and rich he still has real issues, and he still manages to be human and vulnerable. What does Superman have? A gay costume. AND ONE WEAKNESS. Oh boy. Kryptonite. And it took them so long to realise this, and when they did, instead of changing the format to show the issues an "invincible" being may have, Sandman style, or simply have him discover more weaknesses as time went on(There was actually one villian who was quite cool who drained Superman's energy, a kind of loophole, that was one good one but I don't think that came till later either) they killed him and brought him back weaker. Then how the f**k is he going to fight all the old villians!? Who were s**t compared to Batman, anyway. Apocalips? WTF? Is he some kind of sassy male prostitute? So damn gay.
Batman has any number of nifty costumes, why have they never given Superman a decent one? Are they afraid he'll loose his position as Gay Icon of the Universe?

Plus Batman has a butler.

DOES SUPERMAN HAVE A BUTLER!?

I didn't think so.

If he did, he'd probably be called "Francis" or some gay name than that.

Batman is cool. Superman is not so good. Go spread your outerunderpants fashion style somewhere else.

Next time: Is Professor X on LSD?
Last edited by Rosalie on 25 Jul 2005, 11:00, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Johnny M
A Very Nice Man
Posts: 1837
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 12:08
Location: Immer mit Loki.

You do like to light the blue touch paper don't you?
[size=9:7c190484cc]Johnny Boy - JB - Loki - Johnny M

Heartland 14 Jul 03 - 05 Aug 06.[/size:7c190484cc]
User avatar
Rosalie
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 21:17

Johnny M wrote:You do like to light the blue touch paper don't you?
What are you talking about, man?
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

Rosalie wrote:A gay costume.
1960s Batman = grey lycra bodysuit with big blue hotpants over the top

1990s Batman = black rubber bodysuit specially formed to make him look extra butch
анархия
User avatar
Rosalie
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 21:17

Still nowhere near as gay as Superman. You can understand Batman's "armour". Plus he has the cool Batwings thing going on these days.
Anne Widdecombe sucks.
User avatar
RicheyJames
Bad Tempered Young Man
Posts: 1098
Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
Location: far beyond the pale

if we ignore it do you think it'll go away?
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

The thing I prefer about The Batman is his moral ambiguity. In things like "Arkham Asylum" he's perhaps as much a psychopathic lunatic as The Joker et al. And this is what things are like in the "real world"; morality isn't just a black-and-white issue but an infinite gradation of greys. But Supes is "perfectly good" while the baddies are "perfectly bad." Typical neo-con either/or thinking. Superman is the perfect American for the McCarthy era and the Bush dynasty, its heir apparent.

Also, The Batman's just a "normal guy" (OK he's as rich as Croesus) whereas Superman is an alien.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

Mark Gemini Thwaite is a huge batman fan.
(whaaat? I'm in a troublemaking mood!)
User avatar
emilystrange
Above the Chemist
Posts: 9031
Joined: 03 Nov 2003, 20:26
Location: Lady Strange's boudoir.

RicheyJames wrote:if we ignore it do you think it'll go away?
i never thought i'd... but :notworthy:
I don't wanna live like I don't mind
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

markfiend wrote:The thing I prefer about The Batman is his moral ambiguity. In things like "Arkham Asylum" he's perhaps as much a psychopathic lunatic as The Joker et al. And this is what things are like in the "real world"; morality isn't just a black-and-white issue but an infinite gradation of greys. But Supes is "perfectly good" while the baddies are "perfectly bad." Typical neo-con either/or thinking. Superman is the perfect American for the McCarthy era and the Bush dynasty, its heir apparent.
But now 'moral ambiguity' has been done to death - in an odd way it's almost refreshing to go back to a simpler good guy / bad guy scenario...
анархия
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

smiscandlon wrote:
markfiend wrote:The thing I prefer about The Batman is his moral ambiguity. In things like "Arkham Asylum" he's perhaps as much a psychopathic lunatic as The Joker et al. And this is what things are like in the "real world"; morality isn't just a black-and-white issue but an infinite gradation of greys. But Supes is "perfectly good" while the baddies are "perfectly bad." Typical neo-con either/or thinking. Superman is the perfect American for the McCarthy era and the Bush dynasty, its heir apparent.
But now 'moral ambiguity' has been done to death - in an odd way it's almost refreshing to go back to a simpler good guy / bad guy scenario...
No it's not.
Case in point - Doctor who. Clearly the best and coolest thing in the world, ever.
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

d00mw0lf wrote:
smiscandlon wrote:
markfiend wrote:The thing I prefer about The Batman is his moral ambiguity. In things like "Arkham Asylum" he's perhaps as much a psychopathic lunatic as The Joker et al. And this is what things are like in the "real world"; morality isn't just a black-and-white issue but an infinite gradation of greys. But Supes is "perfectly good" while the baddies are "perfectly bad." Typical neo-con either/or thinking. Superman is the perfect American for the McCarthy era and the Bush dynasty, its heir apparent.
But now 'moral ambiguity' has been done to death - in an odd way it's almost refreshing to go back to a simpler good guy / bad guy scenario...
No it's not.
Case in point - Doctor who. Clearly the best and coolest thing in the world, ever.
Funny - Doctor Who was actually what I had in mind as the typical good guy / bad guy thing. I'm sure Terrance Dicks would back me up.
анархия
User avatar
Rosalie
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 21:17

RicheyJames wrote:if we ignore it do you think it'll go away?
Gee, I wonder. I've been thinking about clicking that button on you for a while now. I'd only see your quotes in other people's posts though.
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

Is he buggery! He's a renegade timelord. If you look at it from the right angles, he's every bit as bad as the Master or the Rani.
User avatar
Rosalie
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 21:17

smiscandlon wrote:
d00mw0lf wrote:
smiscandlon wrote: But now 'moral ambiguity' has been done to death - in an odd way it's almost refreshing to go back to a simpler good guy / bad guy scenario...
No it's not.
Case in point - Doctor who. Clearly the best and coolest thing in the world, ever.
Funny - Doctor Who was actually what I had in mind as the typical good guy / bad guy thing. I'm sure Terrance Dicks would back me up.
You haven't watched the new series... or some of the best eps of the old one. The Leisure Hive even comes to mind. Was he entirely wrong to want to continue the race in that way, or was he just selfish and misguided on the wrong path to doing so?

And yeah, the Doctor is a *renegade* Time Lord, but he's not a bad guy, and neither or the Gallifreyans or Timelords. So how is that black and white..?
Last edited by Rosalie on 25 Jul 2005, 11:36, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

d00mw0lf wrote:Is he buggery! He's a renegade timelord. If you look at it from the right angles, he's every bit as bad as the Master or the Rani.
Buggery bollocks. Just watched The War Games, and the Doctor is thoroughly affronted when the War Chief suggests that they're two of a kind.

So there. :P
анархия
User avatar
boudicca
Sister Midnight
Posts: 7427
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 16:15
Location: embrace the margin
Contact:

Rosalie wrote:If he did, he'd probably be called "Francis" or some gay name than that.
:lol:

Francis! :innocent:
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

boudicca wrote:
Rosalie wrote:If he did, he'd probably be called "Francis" or some gay name than that.
:lol:

Francis! :innocent:
I'm sure she was just using that as a general example of a gay name, and nothing personal was intended. :innocent:
анархия
Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

Batman and Superman are both rubbish.
Bring on Eric Draven. :lol:
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

smiscandlon wrote:
d00mw0lf wrote:Is he buggery! He's a renegade timelord. If you look at it from the right angles, he's every bit as bad as the Master or the Rani.
Buggery bollocks. Just watched The War Games, and the Doctor is thoroughly affronted when the War Chief suggests that they're two of a kind.

So there. :P
Well you would be, wouldn't you?
In Shada, the Doctor notes that Salyavin (a criminal mastermind) was "a boyhood hero" of his.
In the last series - he told the Dalek "god" he would always take the coward's way out.
He was exiled to Earth for faffing about with other planets and pissing the timelords off.
His future regeneration (The Valeyard) was pure evil - he even brought Colin baker's regeneration back to gallifrey, put him on trial and then tried to kill him.
Ok, so the doc's not "just evil" but he can hardly be considered a good guy either.
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

Dark wrote:Batman and Superman are both rubbish.
Bring on Eric Draven. :lol:
GGGggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
gggoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
thhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

d00mw0lf wrote:
smiscandlon wrote:
d00mw0lf wrote:Is he buggery! He's a renegade timelord. If you look at it from the right angles, he's every bit as bad as the Master or the Rani.
Buggery bollocks. Just watched The War Games, and the Doctor is thoroughly affronted when the War Chief suggests that they're two of a kind.

So there. :P
Well you would be, wouldn't you?
In Shada, the Doctor notes that Salyavin (a criminal mastermind) was "a boyhood hero" of his.
In the last series - he told the Dalek "god" he would always take the coward's way out.
He was exiled to Earth for faffing about with other planets and pissing the timelords off.
His future regeneration (The Valeyard) was pure evil - he even brought Colin baker's regeneration back to gallifrey, put him on trial and then tried to kill him.
Ok, so the doc's not "just evil" but he can hardly be considered a good guy either.
He'll always be a good guy to me. :kiss:
анархия
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

Dark wrote:Batman and Superman are both rubbish.
Bring on Eric Draven. :lol:
You da man. 8)
анархия
User avatar
Thea
Overbomber
Posts: 2346
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 12:29
Location: Aboard me ship....
Contact:

smiscandlon wrote:
d00mw0lf wrote:
smiscandlon wrote: Buggery bollocks. Just watched The War Games, and the Doctor is thoroughly affronted when the War Chief suggests that they're two of a kind.

So there. :P
Well you would be, wouldn't you?
In Shada, the Doctor notes that Salyavin (a criminal mastermind) was "a boyhood hero" of his.
In the last series - he told the Dalek "god" he would always take the coward's way out.
He was exiled to Earth for faffing about with other planets and pissing the timelords off.
His future regeneration (The Valeyard) was pure evil - he even brought Colin baker's regeneration back to gallifrey, put him on trial and then tried to kill him.
Ok, so the doc's not "just evil" but he can hardly be considered a good guy either.
He'll always be a good guy to me. :kiss:
All the same, I'm getting off this planet before satalite 5 gets up and running! :lol:
User avatar
boudicca
Sister Midnight
Posts: 7427
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 16:15
Location: embrace the margin
Contact:

You ain't seen nuthin' til you've seen Mr. Sinister as The Ultimate Superhero

:lol: :P :innocent: :notworthy:
Last edited by boudicca on 25 Jul 2005, 11:45, edited 1 time in total.
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
Post Reply