revenge of the geeks

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
User avatar
lazarus corporation
Lord Protector
Posts: 3444
Joined: 09 May 2004, 17:42
Location: out there on a darkened road
Contact:

for those of you who have rolled your eyes at us computery-types who start threads here proclaiming the benefits of using Firefox, I'd suggest you scroll down to the bottom of this page on this site.

you know it makes sense.
Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

They have a point. Firefox = God's Own Browser. ;)
User avatar
Obviousman
Outside the Simian Flock
Posts: 7090
Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
Location: Soon over Babaluma
Contact:

Nice :notworthy: :notworthy:

And he knows why ;D

But does he also use firefox then? :innocent: (which I switched to earlier this week and am very happy with)
Styles are a lie.

My Facebook/My Flickr
User avatar
eastmidswhizzkid
Faster Than The Light Of Speed
Posts: 9881
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 00:01
Location: WhizzWorld
Contact:

i saw that earlier -good on him. i changed to firefox ages ago on the strength of the HLer recommendations -as far as i'm concerned the geeks hereon know more about computers than all of my other mates put together; and like mr fiend says, anything's better than using microsoft stuff.
Well I was handsome and I was strong
And I knew the words to every song.
"Did my singing please you?"
"No! The words you sang were wrong!"

:bat:
aims
Overbomber
Posts: 3211
Joined: 27 Mar 2005, 13:16
Location: in between

I agree entirely ;D

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5 :innocent:

I want my Gentoo back :cry:
Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

I WILL use Windows, because Linux would be pointless on my computer, since it's used solely for music (hören und machen) and gaming.
User avatar
emilystrange
Above the Chemist
Posts: 9031
Joined: 03 Nov 2003, 20:26
Location: Lady Strange's boudoir.

i have no idea what you're talking about.
I don't wanna live like I don't mind
User avatar
scotty
Overbomber
Posts: 4880
Joined: 10 Jun 2005, 23:03
Location: Behind the Door.........

lazarus corporation wrote:for those of you who have rolled your eyes at us computery-types who start threads here proclaiming the benefits of using Firefox, I'd suggest you scroll down to the bottom of this page on this site.

you know it makes sense.
Does that mean "Fire Fox" won't let anything new through for 15 years? :innocent:
Being brave is coming home at 2am half drunk, smelling of perfume, climbing into bed, slapping the wife on the arse and saying,"right fatty, you're next!!"
User avatar
vicus
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 997
Joined: 21 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: behind the door
Contact:

eastmidswhizzkid wrote:... anything's better than using microsoft stuff.
that's why i'm using Opera 8.5.
(Don't know why I should use that Firefox)
"Am Anfang wurde das Universum erschaffen.
Das machte viele Leute sehr wütend und wurde allenthalben als Schritt in die falsche Richtung angesehen."


http://www.poison-door.net/
User avatar
Obviousman
Outside the Simian Flock
Posts: 7090
Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
Location: Soon over Babaluma
Contact:

vicus wrote:
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:... anything's better than using microsoft stuff.
that's why i'm using Opera 8.5.
(Don't know why I should use that Firefox)
Some of us have been keen Opera users as well, and mostly enjoyed that experience very much as well :notworthy: However, Opera doesn't get you on every site, Firefox does...
Styles are a lie.

My Facebook/My Flickr
User avatar
Silver_Owl
The Don
Posts: 7498
Joined: 27 Sep 2003, 18:52

I use Opera but Frefox has a nicer ring to it.
End of non-geek logic comment.
We forgive as we forget
As the day is long.
User avatar
Ocean Moves
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 589
Joined: 08 Nov 2004, 19:22
Location: Australia

vicus wrote:
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:... anything's better than using microsoft stuff.
that's why i'm using Opera 8.5.
(Don't know why I should use that Firefox)
So, *why* are other browsers "better" ?
I've never really got to the bottom of this.

I don't see why I should use Opera.

My IE6 retrieves html and composes it
into a page I can read and interact with.

What else does yours do ??
User avatar
eastmidswhizzkid
Faster Than The Light Of Speed
Posts: 9881
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 00:01
Location: WhizzWorld
Contact:

firefox gives you little pictures next to your favourite bookmarks.....:innocent: :P :roll:
Well I was handsome and I was strong
And I knew the words to every song.
"Did my singing please you?"
"No! The words you sang were wrong!"

:bat:
User avatar
Ocean Moves
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 589
Joined: 08 Nov 2004, 19:22
Location: Australia

eastmidswhizzkid wrote:firefox gives you little pictures next to your favourite bookmarks.....:innocent: :P :roll:
Wow.
User avatar
eastmidswhizzkid
Faster Than The Light Of Speed
Posts: 9881
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 00:01
Location: WhizzWorld
Contact:

:roll: :roll: :roll: you are hard to impress, aren't you? :roll: :roll:
if you expect intelligent company at this time in the morning then you got it; if you want sensible as well.....computer says no. :lol:
Well I was handsome and I was strong
And I knew the words to every song.
"Did my singing please you?"
"No! The words you sang were wrong!"

:bat:
User avatar
Ocean Moves
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 589
Joined: 08 Nov 2004, 19:22
Location: Australia

eastmidswhizzkid wrote::roll: :roll: :roll: you are hard to impress, aren't you? :roll: :roll:
if you expect intelligent company at this time in the morning then you got it; if you want sensible as well.....computer says no. :lol:
Fair enough......I'll take your word for it that there's a host of
other great features I'll just never know about :lol:

You're burning the candle late...even the quiffs turned in for the night
I reckon....
Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

Firefox is also more secure than IE6.
aims
Overbomber
Posts: 3211
Joined: 27 Mar 2005, 13:16
Location: in between

Ocean Moves wrote:My IE6 retrieves html and composes it
into a page I can read and interact with.
Unless it contains anything more than basic CSS or PNG transparency, in which case you're very lucky if it does :urff:

And its HTML rendering isn't exactly renowned as anything more than possibly acceptable. Apple is furthest in front here, since their patches to KHTML mean that Safari passes Acid2. (Not that I'd use software starting with a K [/gnome-militant] ;)).

Finally, IE p!sses on the whole mime-type system. If the server sets a mime-type but the file extension disagrees with it, IE goes (in contravention of the HTTP standard, I might add) with guessing from the extension. As someone who used to download a lot of Gzip archives prior to switching to firefox, that was a major pain, it would just dump the binary to the page instead of prompting me to save it :|
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16795
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

yes, but...

90% of web designers code to make their site look how they want in IE, with the rest of the browsers as an afterthought (if you're lucky)

thus browsing using IE is more often than not going to give you exactly the experience the web site's creator wanted you to have.

;) :innocent:
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
Obviousman
Outside the Simian Flock
Posts: 7090
Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
Location: Soon over Babaluma
Contact:

But IE is the slowest of the three, and the least tweakable, right?
Styles are a lie.

My Facebook/My Flickr
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16795
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

absolutely, but would your mum or gran really bothered about "tweaking"? or would they rather something that looks like the rest of Windows?

:innocent:
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
Ocean Moves
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 589
Joined: 08 Nov 2004, 19:22
Location: Australia

Obviousman wrote:But IE is the slowest of the three, and the least tweakable, right?
Surely the speed of your internet connection is going to be the
decisive factor in this - not your browser.

I've used Firefox afew times and I've never noticed it to be "faster"
than IE.
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Quiff Boy wrote:90% of web designers code to make their site look how they want in IE, with the rest of the browsers as an afterthought (if you're lucky)
Do they? Dude, that's slack.

I always preview in all of IE, FireFox, and Apple Safari to (try to) make sure everything looks the same in all three. If it does, then chances are any other browsers will see it the same way. :innocent:
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Obviousman
Outside the Simian Flock
Posts: 7090
Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
Location: Soon over Babaluma
Contact:

Ocean Moves wrote:
Obviousman wrote:But IE is the slowest of the three, and the least tweakable, right?
Surely the speed of your internet connection is going to be the
decisive factor in this - not your browser.

I've used Firefox afew times and I've never noticed it to be "faster"
than IE.
Well for some reason or another they seem to get the page in a faster way, don't ask me how, but they do. Of course it depends on which pages you're trying to load and also your connection, I presume when you don't have broadband it comes out more obvious. I know back in the days I really found Opera to be faster then MSIE, didn't notice any big differences when I switched from MSIE to FF though.

@QB: But there's where the (grand)son comes in who knows all about computers. Thus we can make computing a more pleasant experience, or something... :lol:
And isn't there some IE-lookalike thingy for FF around? (don't know as I can't bother to use themes)
Styles are a lie.

My Facebook/My Flickr
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16795
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

heheh :twisted:

sorry, couldnt resist playing devils advocate. i'm actually in favoutr of this stuff too, and like mark code to FF, opera and IE on that basis that almost everything else is a port or a wrapper around of one of those...

but its a fair point i was trying to make. we're all coming at this from a techie point of view. in the real world, people like my dad dont give as crap about open source, web standards, etc etc

they want an icon on the desktop that they can click, and that shows every website they look at as the designer intended - and a lot of personal website coders and fansite coders arent really that techie, so they do actually just code to the browser they use. which tends to be IE.

and there's a decent enough number of sites that use propriotary technologies like active-x (boo hisss!) that only IE can support.

and security - we all know IE is less secure than many other browsers out there, but its written by the same company who did the o/s. we've all heard of them. for a non techie there's a huge comfort factor.

also, many coporate websites endorse IE, guarantee their security based in IE's security model, even show FAQ guides using IE screenshots...

IE comes with windows o/s. its just there. for someone like my dad thats more than enough for him.

:innocent: ;)
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
Post Reply