I'm as happy to hear your views as anyone elses,soundengine wrote:whatever... If posting an opposing opinion in the face of a bunch of asslickers is ignorance, then sign me up. It seems to me the ignorant ones are yourselves.
Its really quite ignorant of yourselves to shoot at me because I have an opposing opinion, but If I were on your side saying: "f**k you man, they dont need a drummer!" how many of you would be standing besides me then...
f**king hypocrites.
And you guys that are saying: "Man, this isnt the place for this stuff".
Wrong, I WAS at the San Diego show, I posted my review of it. If you didnt like it, and want to send your negative comments about my opinionated view, AND you didnt attend the show, then I think it is you who are in the wrong forum. Was it too hard to think: "Hmm.. Its his opinion. Ill let that go." No, you have to defend everything the band does. Hell, if the band got a drummer next tour, you guys would suck his dick and say: "The drummer is SOOoooooooOOOOOOOOoooooooo great."
Thanks for the warm welcome cocks.
but speaking personally I find the idea that
the Sisters "need a drummer" abit ridiculous.
This is because I believe the definition of the Sisters sound
relies on the sound of Andrews voice and the drum machine.
To me, the defining sound of the Sisters is what I love,
and what sets them apart from their contemporaries,
and gives them their uniqueness.
If you are wishing for this to change, then I interpret
that as a desire for a different sounding Sisters all together.
To me, that is the equivilent of hearing the sex pistols,
and then suggesting that they should get singing lessons.
Or hearing Depeche mode, and suggesting that
they should get rid of the keyboards and use accoustic
instruments instead.
I'm not knocking your opinion, but this is my
view point, and I would guess there are others
who feel the same way.