The Reptile House EP

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
User avatar
Norman Hunter
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1870
Joined: 29 Sep 2004, 12:41
Location: Leeds
Contact:

The Reptile House is awesome. As I keep telling anyone who'd care to listen, it's my official Fav Sisters Moment.

And I was only 10... :oops:
Jaimie1980
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 489
Joined: 27 May 2005, 12:51
Location: Belfast

The Reptile House tracks are amongst TSOM's finest work IMHO. 8)
User avatar
MrChris
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1413
Joined: 21 May 2003, 11:34
Location: A Forest

Badlander wrote:
MrChris wrote:Have we done the bit yet about how Fix sounds just like Ziggy Stardust, but slowed down?
You're refering to how the bass line kind of sounds like Ziggy's guitar part ?
Well maybe but only slightly I'd say. That wouldn't be a huge surprise anyway since Von is, quite understandably, a major Bowie fan. :von:
That's the one. I agree, there's nothing wrong with that, but hearing one always makes me hear the other one in my head at the same time, which is an interesting experience...
Chris

---------------------------------------------
Again and again and again...
User avatar
RobF
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 569
Joined: 25 Mar 2002, 00:00
Location: Brixton/Bayswater/Beirut depending on the mood

Syberberg wrote:
Ramone wrote:Some people just have waaaaay too much time on their hands! Get over yourselves, it's just a piece of round black plastic ! I find that some folk wish to read alot more into people's lyrics and the structure of songs than is actually good for them. At the end of the day ( avoiding cliches like the plague), it's just a bunch of songs, that were cobbled together back in 1983, nothing more - nothing less. And if deep down you truly believe that it 'changed' your life, then you really need some sort of reality check, it's not too late.Life's too short . Rant over.
When Von describes himself as "Kierkegaard meets Elvis", do you have any idea what he means by that? Probably not, so here's a little hint:

Kierkegaard (1813 - 1855), a Danish philosopher, sought to provide a service for his own contemporaries similar to that which Socrates provided for his fellow Greeks. He used irony, parody, satire, humor, and deconstructive techniques in order to make conventionally accepted forms of knowledge and value untenable. He was a gadfly — constantly irritating his contemporaries with discomforting thoughts. He was also a midwife — assisting at the birth of individual subjectivity by forcing his contemporaries to think for themselves. His art of communication became "the art of taking away" since he thought his audience suffered from too much knowledge rather than too little. (In this case things seem to be pretty much reversed, or perhaps one could substitute "information" for "knowledge").

The Sisters of Mercy; philosophy you can dance to.

The most sensible response, thank you sir. Not enough study of the Dane goes on in these parts.

Anyone bankrupted by a love of fine stationary gets my vote.

De Omnibus Dubitandum Est.

And yes, I am a twit ;D
"...by the time I get to Arizona..."
User avatar
wild bill buttock
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 675
Joined: 26 Mar 2006, 21:39
Location: West Midlands,England

You may think that's pretencious bollocks but try this then http://echoes.devin.com/triad.html
The photographs of God I bought have almost faded away
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

I held this very E.P. in my hands today... but Resurrection Records can f**k off, ain't paying eight quid for it :P
nick the stripper
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1732
Joined: 16 Dec 2004, 01:02
Location: Somewhere between Athens and Jerusalem.
Contact:

I've got one thing to say: The Reptile House EP is the finest collection of songs Eldritch has ever put out.
jay
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 485
Joined: 02 Nov 2003, 22:18
Location: Liverpool

robertzombie wrote:I held this very E.P. in my hands today... but Resurrection Records can f**k off, ain't paying eight quid for it :P
Eight quid, that's a veritable bargain for the Reptile House e.p.
I no longer get very wrought up over the liminals

Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

Not really. I think I got mine for a fiver.

If it's the first edition with lyric sheet, perhaps £7-8 is a good price, yes.
jay
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 485
Joined: 02 Nov 2003, 22:18
Location: Liverpool

I've no idea how much it's worth now. Bought mine new for about £3:50 from Probe in Liverpool many moons ago.

I would pay £8:00 for it now if I was to replace though
I no longer get very wrought up over the liminals

User avatar
Badlander
Overbomber
Posts: 3566
Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea

On the mainland you usually find it at about 15€ (£10).
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

Well I'll be back in Camden tomorrow so I might pick it up now you've said that!
User avatar
RobF
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 569
Joined: 25 Mar 2002, 00:00
Location: Brixton/Bayswater/Beirut depending on the mood

wild bill buttock wrote:You may think that's pretencious bollocks but try this then http://echoes.devin.com/triad.html
The main difference being that Kierkegaard and Eldritch are right, and therefore allowed to be pretentious, and those people are wrong, entertaining, but deluded, and erm, a bit thick. (O.K. Thick-sounding, I was just being a twit, again) ;D
"...by the time I get to Arizona..."
User avatar
H. Blackrose
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 624
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 06:06
Location: laying down the long white line

RobF wrote:
wild bill buttock wrote:You may think that's pretencious bollocks but try this then http://echoes.devin.com/triad.html
The main difference being that Kierkegaard and Eldritch are right, and therefore allowed to be pretentious, and those people are wrong, entertaining, but deluded, and erm, a bit thick. (O.K. Thick-sounding, I was just being a tw*t, again) ;D
The Sisters are a band influenced mainly by T. S. Eliot, left-libertarian politics and the great works of Western philosophy, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Fields of the Nephilim are a band influenced mainly by slasher movies, H. P. Lovecraft and badly assimilated "chaos magick" theories, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Sisters are culture. The Neph are what passes for culture among over-educated teenagers who think they're much cooler than they actually are.

I actually really like a couple of Neph albums, but that's irrelevant to the current discussion.
User avatar
Syberberg
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 959
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 05:46
Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire.

RobF wrote:
The main difference being that Kierkegaard and Eldritch are right, and therefore allowed to be pretentious, and those people are wrong, entertaining, but deluded, and erm, a bit thick. (O.K. Thick-sounding, I was just being a tw*t, again) ;D
Being a tw*t's just in yer Nietzsche, innit? Or are ya just a crotchety ald bugger who wishes he was Jung again? :innocent:
I don't necessarily agree with everything I think.
User avatar
Badlander
Overbomber
Posts: 3566
Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea

H. Blackrose wrote:The Sisters are a band influenced mainly by T. S. Eliot, left-libertarian politics and the great works of Western philosophy, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Fields of the Nephilim are a band influenced mainly by slasher movies, H. P. Lovecraft and badly assimilated "chaos magick" theories, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Sisters are culture. The Neph are what passes for culture among over-educated teenagers who think they're much cooler than they actually are.

I actually really like a couple of Neph albums, but that's irrelevant to the current discussion.
What's wrong with horror movies ? What's wrong with Lovecraft ? :eek:
You should try to sound a little less pretentious for your own good. :roll: :innocent:
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
User avatar
mugabe
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 682
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 13:31
Location: Avesta
Contact:

The Nephilim are mythology. The Sisters are Realpolitik.
Nothing ventured, nothing lost
Dark
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6605
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
Contact:

The Ghosties are a warm afternoon with a distorted guitar and a gorgeous hairstyle.
The Sisters are a wet autumn night with some yellow lights, baldness and sideburns.
User avatar
MrChris
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1413
Joined: 21 May 2003, 11:34
Location: A Forest

I have no idea why you consider the Sisters left-libertarian, Mr Blackrose. That's a very specific, and quite problematic, political-philosophical position, and if I recall correctly the lyrics to Kiss the Carpet make very little reference to issues of self-ownership, wage slavery and global resource distribution.

I'm also far from sure that the Sisters are a band 'mainly' influenced by old T.S. Eliot, aside from the a few quotations / references plus Eldritch's adoption of the general flood=salvation motif at various points in the 1980s. The identification of Eldritch as some kind of Eliot acolyte is a huge exaggeration, especially given the massive difference between their political positions. You could just as easily (and wrongly) claim that the large numbers of biblical references makes the Sisters a band 'mainly' influenced by Christianity...
Chris

---------------------------------------------
Again and again and again...
User avatar
scotty
Overbomber
Posts: 4880
Joined: 10 Jun 2005, 23:03
Location: Behind the Door.........

Dark wrote:The Ghosties are a warm afternoon with a distorted guitar and a gorgeous hairstyle.
The Sisters are a wet autumn night with some yellow lights, baldness and sideburns.
Yup :notworthy:
Being brave is coming home at 2am half drunk, smelling of perfume, climbing into bed, slapping the wife on the arse and saying,"right fatty, you're next!!"
User avatar
Badlander
Overbomber
Posts: 3566
Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea

mugabe wrote:The Nephilim are mythology. The Sisters are Realpolitik.
So very well said. :notworthy: 8)
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
User avatar
wild bill buttock
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 675
Joined: 26 Mar 2006, 21:39
Location: West Midlands,England

H. Blackrose wrote:
RobF wrote:
wild bill buttock wrote:You may think that's pretencious bollocks but try this then http://echoes.devin.com/triad.html
The main difference being that Kierkegaard and Eldritch are right, and therefore allowed to be pretentious, and those people are wrong, entertaining, but deluded, and erm, a bit thick. (O.K. Thick-sounding, I was just being a tw*t, again) ;D
The Sisters are a band influenced mainly by T. S. Eliot, left-libertarian politics and the great works of Western philosophy, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Fields of the Nephilim are a band influenced mainly by slasher movies, H. P. Lovecraft and badly assimilated "chaos magick" theories, and whose serious fans are of the same calibre. The Sisters are culture. The Neph are what passes for culture among over-educated teenagers who think they're much cooler than they actually are.

I actually really like a couple of Neph albums, but that's irrelevant to the current discussion.
If I had the slightest idea what you are rambling on about I'd most probably disagree.When it comes to philosophy I prefer "the Macc lads" and even they can get a little too intellectual for me.
What a crock of pretentious toss!Its music for f**k sake!
The photographs of God I bought have almost faded away
User avatar
czuczu
Overbomber
Posts: 2191
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 14:11
Location: UK

Syberberg wrote:
RobF wrote:
The main difference being that Kierkegaard and Eldritch are right, and therefore allowed to be pretentious, and those people are wrong, entertaining, but deluded, and erm, a bit thick. (O.K. Thick-sounding, I was just being a tw*t, again) ;D
Being a tw*t's just in yer Nietzsche, innit? Or are ya just a crotchety ald bugger who wishes he was Jung again? :innocent:

You won't need your coat, it's warm out.. :innocent:
User avatar
wild bill buttock
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 675
Joined: 26 Mar 2006, 21:39
Location: West Midlands,England

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could think you under the table.
David Hume could out consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya
'bout the raisin' of the wrist.
Socrates himself was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
after half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.
Plato, they say, could stick it away,
'alf a crate of whiskey every day!
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
and Hobbes was fond of his Dram.
And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart:
"I drink, therefore I am."

Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
The photographs of God I bought have almost faded away
User avatar
9while9
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 19 Feb 2006, 19:29
Location: Parts Unknown or Isle of Tonga (whichever you prefer).

wild bill buttock wrote:Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could think you under the table.
David Hume could out consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya
'bout the raisin' of the wrist.
Socrates himself was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
after half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.
Plato, they say, could stick it away,
'alf a crate of whiskey every day!
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
and Hobbes was fond of his Dram.
And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart:
"I drink, therefore I am."

Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Your making me thristy.... :lol:

Denken Sie Orange!!!
"An artist is a creature driven by demons. He doesn't know why they choose him and he's usually too busy to wonder why." - William Faulkner

-Me, I'm inspired by my DarkAngel.
Post Reply