no names, no pack drillPat wrote:Is that you,me and Keith
thanks for allowing the hi-jack Jess
no names, no pack drillPat wrote:Is that you,me and Keith
I thought it was me, me and mePat wrote:Is that you,me and KeithJames Blast wrote:Balding old fat blokes, Specky bastards and Ginger nuts!canon docre wrote:What does he see when looking into his audience?
That's true. I mean, just because he can't be arsed to put anything out from the studio is a bit, well, annoying to say-the-least and I find all the excuses that blame the industry/pondlife/audience to be wearing rather thin. If it were me, I'd release them just to prove a point. But all this procrastination of his is turning onto a very bad version of Hamlet.weebleswobble wrote:Fair enough Syberberg but just 'cause you're a great lyricist disnae mean you can vanish up yer own jacksie
Harsh but true.Syberberg wrote:That's true. I mean, just because he can't be arsed to put anything out from the studio is a bit, well, annoying to say-the-least and I find all the excuses that blame the industry/pondlife/audience to be wearing rather thin. If it were me, I'd release them just to prove a point. But all this procrastination of his is turning onto a very bad version of Hamlet.
Syberberg should talk to , someone get the number!mh wrote:Harsh but true.Syberberg wrote:That's true. I mean, just because he can't be arsed to put anything out from the studio is a bit, well, annoying to say-the-least and I find all the excuses that blame the industry/pondlife/audience to be wearing rather thin. If it were me, I'd release them just to prove a point. But all this procrastination of his is turning onto a very bad version of Hamlet.
That's part of the problem, isn't it?Dark wrote:Plus the fact that no major label's going to touch him with a bargepole.
No label owned by Warner is going to go near the band anymore, the other Big Five-owned labels know that he took advantage of WEA when SSVing his way out. No independent labels have the money or distribution he wants.
Face it, his "starting position" of $3m is looking more and more pathetic and fewer labels seem to care.
Lower it to a single on sale-or-return at a few shops and you'll sell them. Demand money like that from an audience, professional or otherwise, with waning interest, and the albums won't be out.
Good point. The thing is, Andrew now has the artistic freedom he always said he's wanted, he just doesn't seem to know what to actually do with it. He could release on a large scale via the Merciful Release section of the website (otherwise, why on earth is it there?) and I'm pretty sure that word would spread via here and the Dominion mailing list. So sales can't be that much of a factor, it's almost got to be something deeper, something on a more intense and personal level that goes beyond sheer laziness.Badlander wrote:There's another explanation apart from the "no one gets the lyrics anymore" thing : Von's supposed to be a recording artist and yet he hates everything that has to do with the record companies, the music business, etc. I guess it's not that he doesn't see the point in making the songs available, but there's no way in his mind to make them available in a satisfactory way : on a large scale, by some competent record company, with the required degree of artistic freedom. That I can understand, even if it does annoy me.
In a way this is comparable to Kate Bush's situation, who stopped touring altogether in 1979. She wasn't very interesting in all the crap that goes with touring. And she too struggled mightily to achieve artistic freedom BTW.
Thanks James.Jeez you're good Syberberg!
That might not be such a Good Idea weebleswobble...it has the potential to go downhill very rapidly indeed. That's if Von would actually listen to me in the first place.Syberberg should talk to ! , someone get the number!
QED., A.void.wild bill buttock wrote:Sorry mate but this statement is complete old bollocks.A.void wrote:People seem to think that Eldritch personally owes them something for being his most loyal nutcases.
Andrew Eldritch does owe his loyal fanbase.
nowayjose you just do not get it - "nostalgic whingers"-Someone crank the Fud Alertnowayjose wrote:QED., A.void.wild bill buttock wrote:Sorry mate but this statement is complete old bollocks.A.void wrote:People seem to think that Eldritch personally owes them something for being his most loyal nutcases.
Andrew Eldritch does owe his loyal fanbase.
Sorry mate, you might not believe me but a few of us actually like the current band & sound and it's a bit annoying to see some nostalgic whingers trying to sour it up for the rest of us. If you can't accept that artists undergo change, like everyone else, and you want Eldritch to stay forever in the tracks of his early appearances miming a gloomy, angst-driven, drug-addled twenty-something at the age of 47 just so you can indulge in a cheap, superficial nostalgia trip you probably need to get your reality screws readjusted rather sooner than later.
I say, where's the FUDmaster when you need him?weebleswobble wrote:nowayjose you just do not get it - "nostalgic whingers"-Someone crank the Fud Alertnowayjose wrote:QED., A.void.wild bill buttock wrote: Sorry mate but this statement is complete old bollocks.
Andrew Eldritch does owe his loyal fanbase.
Sorry mate, you might not believe me but a few of us actually like the current band & sound and it's a bit annoying to see some nostalgic whingers trying to sour it up for the rest of us. If you can't accept that artists undergo change, like everyone else, and you want Eldritch to stay forever in the tracks of his early appearances miming a gloomy, angst-driven, drug-addled twenty-something at the age of 47 just so you can indulge in a cheap, superficial nostalgia trip you probably need to get your reality screws readjusted rather sooner than later.
Exactly what point would he prove by releasing a record?Syberberg wrote: If it were me, I'd release them just to prove a point.
Syberberg wrote:"To release or not to release: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous music journalism,
Or to take arms against a sea of pondlife,
And by opposing end them?"
Aye, I was agreeing.Mokarran wrote:Markfiend - my point was simply that Von chooses not to go down the most obviously commercial/exploitative path, so money cannot be his sole motivation. Can it?
Discuss.Oscar Wilde wrote: The central problem in Hamlet is whether the critics are mad or only pretending to be mad.
Don't get me wrong : that's two completely different subjects. Von did say and write at various points that some singles and a DVD were in the making. On the other hand, he never at any point publicly mentioned the shelf full of new songs. He was just casually talking to a dedicated fan (not me), and never made anything close to a promise. I don't have the details, but I guess it's perfectly normal for any recording artist to write and record new stuff. Not releasing any of it is a tad more annoying of course. If there wasn't any new unreleased stuff at all, then I'd be very surprised.twp wrote:The only thing that really niggles me is the veiled promises of new material “a dvd�, a few singles, a shelf full of songs, the (relatively constant given the band’s communication process) tantalising dangling of something that never materialises.
That quality outweights quanity. That substance can go hand in hand with style, rather than style subsuming substance.canon docre wrote:Exactly what point would he prove by releasing a record?Syberberg wrote: If it were me, I'd release them just to prove a point.
1. One would've thought that the example of the success of the Artic Monkeys clearly shows that the traditional way of releasing records, by relying upon the majors, is now somewhat outdated.1. He cant get a decent record deal at a major label nowadays.
2. He can't write Hit singles anymore.
3. He sells a lot less than before.
4. The world doesnt care.
I'm completely sure he's aware of these points, but the moment he would release, they would become apparent to the outside too and his theoretical failure would become a real one.
Hard to take if your lifelong dreams shatters by reality.
Welll said......wild bill buttock wrote:Are we really saying The sisters of mercy can't sell records anymore?
Wake up and smell the coffee,people.The bloke has just completed a major European and North American sell out(almost) tour on the back of no recent product,almost zero publicity and a history of p*ss-poor live shows.
Even a mediocre album is going to sell s**t loads!
The interest is still there obviously.Every darkling,black metal and goth-metal band are citing The girls as a major influence.Trad goth(Sorry) is at its most popular for 15 years.I go to a mainly trad-goth club most weeks and as well as us old "Nostalgics" there is an influx of late teen/early 20's uni students and they're there to hear the Sisters,the Neph et al.Play Dominion or TOL at any rock club and the dance floor will be packed.Only the most ignorant techno-headed cyber-goth could deny TSOM's contribution to dark electronica.Even sub goth like "The Editors" are selling bucket loads of albums.NME's tip for the next big thing is a death-rock/batcave style gothic band called "The horrors".
C'mon Von get your head out of your arse!
Von can't expect the major record labels to be interested.When the f**k have they any idea what people over 12 and under 50 really want to hear?
P.s.I'd like to thank nowayjose for demonstrating to all of us south of the border the true meaning of the ancient Scottish word
FUD