Should the U.N. punish N. Korea for its actions?

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.

Should the U.N. punish N. Korea for its actions?

yes
9
50%
no
9
50%
 
Total votes: 18
User avatar
Badlander
Overbomber
Posts: 3566
Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea

ruffers wrote:
Badlander wrote:For failing to detonate a nuke ? :P :lol:
If they did violate the non-proliferation treaty, of course they should be punished. But so should other countries. :evil:
IIRC they withdrew from that treaty in 2003 - difficult to violate a treaty you're not part of I'd have thought? :innocent:
Unless it is considered customary law (jus cogens). International law has its twists.
They may not be condemned for violating the non-proliferation treaty, but they still could be considered a threat to world security (UN Charter, chap. 7), even if they were not a member of the UN.
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Technically, they didn't fail to detonate their nuke, they merely failed to obtain the expected yield.

The "fizzle" was most likely cased by incorrect implosion of the Pu core, leading to the nuclear explosion blowing most of the core away before it could react.

It could be argued that a bomb where only 5% of the plutonium actually fissions is more dangerous than one in which 40-50% of the Pu goes foom, in that the "fizzle" releases far more radioactivity into the environment as fallout: a "dirty bomb" :urff:
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
9while9
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1384
Joined: 19 Feb 2006, 19:29
Location: Parts Unknown or Isle of Tonga (whichever you prefer).

markfiend wrote:Technically, they didn't fail to detonate their nuke, they merely failed to obtain the expected yield.

The "fizzle" was most likely cased by incorrect implosion of the Pu core, leading to the nuclear explosion blowing most of the core away before it could react.

It could be argued that a bomb where only 5% of the plutonium actually fissions is more dangerous than one in which 40-50% of the Pu goes foom, in that the "fizzle" releases far more radioactivity into the environment as fallout: a "dirty bomb" :urff:

Keen observation Mr. Fiend....... :notworthy:
"An artist is a creature driven by demons. He doesn't know why they choose him and he's usually too busy to wonder why." - William Faulkner

-Me, I'm inspired by my DarkAngel.
Post Reply