Programming geek!Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
Press!
- RetroGoth
- Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 174
- Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:06
- Location: People's Republic Of West Lancashire
When I was at college, circa 1990, I was given loads of Sisters bootlegs from fellow fans. Then I discovered the internetmh wrote:Negative waves man, negative waves!Ocean Moves wrote:all fool you then !RetroGoth wrote:Not bought a Sisters bootleg for 16 years!
seriously though - I'm embarissed by this release. skipping tracks,
band name and album name printed wrong...... its pathetic that they
can't even get these basic things right, when they know it's a band
who's audience care about this kind of stuff. and it's remastered?
is it really?? this record company is too lazy to get the same font on
the cd poster as is on ALL THREE of the cd's....you think they really pulled
the stops out to do a good job of the remaster? I don't think so.
it's a cheap, poor cash in. as for thinking it indicates a new release....
blissful thinking, but totally unfounded IMO.
Not a case of being foolish really, just don't want to support what can be seen as an illegal trade that is cashing in on the band (any band, not just ). I'd sooner say to the artist "I have some bootlegs of your work, fancy a few pints or whatever". I'm all for supporting the artist. That it unless it's hussey whom is more p*ss artist. I'd sooner smash his face in over the Planet X incident, as mentioned in one of my earlier posts.
On the other hand, the brain of an idiot seldom weighs more than 23oz - Gray's Anatomy
- weebleswobble
- Underneath the Rock
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 06:57
- Location: The Bat-Milk Cave
- Contact:
RetroGoth wrote: I'd sooner smash his face in over the Planet X incident, as mentioned in one of my earlier posts.
‎"We will wear some very loud shirts. We will wear some very wrong trousers."
- weebleswobble
- Underneath the Rock
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 06:57
- Location: The Bat-Milk Cave
- Contact:
Big Brother is watching YOUMotz wrote:Nope, that'd be 'ungood += 2', not 'pre-increment ungood'8.5 wrote:I thought it was a 1984 reference...mh wrote: Programming geek!
‎"We will wear some very loud shirts. We will wear some very wrong trousers."
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
In Soviet Russia you watch Big Brother!weebleswobble wrote:Big Brother is watching YOU
- sultan2075
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 19:17
- Location: Washington, D. C.
- Contact:
8.5 wrote:I thought it was a 1984 reference...mh wrote:Programming geek!Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
As did I...doubleplusungood. Then again, I'm literate.
Also drunk!
EDIT: Very drunk, because my friends are bad people!
--
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.