Here it is! The new and improved Crash And Burn from The Mumbles
ENJOY!
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 152333A121
"While we're waiting for the next one to arrive!"
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
What do you mean? It sounds fine to us...
The vocals sounds overdrived, like there was too much gain on the mic.
The other thing is a well known problem for most dynamic microphones. If you sing very close into the mic, you get much more bass presence - nice on a quiet voice (like in ballads) but if you sing louder/raise your voice you have to avoid hum and pop sounds by increase the distance to the mic
The other thing is a well known problem for most dynamic microphones. If you sing very close into the mic, you get much more bass presence - nice on a quiet voice (like in ballads) but if you sing louder/raise your voice you have to avoid hum and pop sounds by increase the distance to the mic
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Listening to the Mumble Crash and Burn now, it's way better than before All keys and piano in sync (apart from the piano bit at the end from 4:20 till 4:40ish), sounding great!
But I have to agree with DocSommer for the vocals. They are a bit overdrived, but also the drums are a bit too loud and clipping, I think...
Apart from those little things, the overall mix is rather good, only when you use that extra delays on the vocals, then the vocals are a bit too loud.
Just some advice of course, it sounds good for the rest AND it remains a surprising cover version
IZ.
But I have to agree with DocSommer for the vocals. They are a bit overdrived, but also the drums are a bit too loud and clipping, I think...
Apart from those little things, the overall mix is rather good, only when you use that extra delays on the vocals, then the vocals are a bit too loud.
Just some advice of course, it sounds good for the rest AND it remains a surprising cover version
IZ.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
I've still got all the individual .wav files so I'll have a tinker.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
OK, I turned the drums down, turned the vocals down to reduce the distortion on the "hum of the power lines..." bit, done "click-pop removal" and "clip restoration" (adobe audition).
I think this one sounds better
uploading atm
I think this one sounds better
uploading atm
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Gonna have a listen to the new one when ULed then...robertzombie wrote:OK, I turned the drums down, turned the vocals down to reduce the distortion on the "hum of the power lines..." bit, done "click-pop removal" and "clip restoration" (adobe audition).
I think this one sounds better
uploading atm
Now, you HAVE the separate WAVs you said eh?
IZ.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
here it is: http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 5668182021
yes, I have all the wav's for the first one posted above and this updated one.
so anything you need I have
yes, I have all the wav's for the first one posted above and this updated one.
so anything you need I have
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
I still hear those annoying crunchy bits, and it's in the drums I fear... And the vocals could do with a bit of enhancing (low cuts, boost hi freq, well... some average vocal brightening).robertzombie wrote:here it is: http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 5668182021
yes, I have all the wav's for the first one posted above and this updated one.
so anything you need I have
If you are willing to give it out of your hands for a second (I understand if you don't want to fear not ), AND if it is not more than 100 MB to YouSendIt, I'll gladly give it a go to mix (I mean 'enhance the sound', because the mixing in general (volume and balance-wise) is good )
Cheers!
IZ.
Aye, I think the clipping in the drums is from the original recording, I'm afraid They come nowhere peaking on the MP3, anyway.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
I'll up' the .wav then
Less than a 100MB? Doubtful, IZ. Depends on how many tracks it was recorded and in what format. But I agree it needs sound enhancement in the areas you pointed out; so if you would lend these fellas a hand they'll have a much better sound for it. I just hope the slight distortion on the drums isn't in the source file. The proximity effect on the vocals makes them muffled; I even heard some popping noise here and there. Aren't we the meticulous bunch...
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
The .wav file is 50,000 KBs
(you do mean the entire song as a .wav file, and not all the individual instrumental bits, right?)
(you do mean the entire song as a .wav file, and not all the individual instrumental bits, right?)
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
Stay tuned for our next exiting episode when Iz says: Indeed
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
Indeed, Brother Blast . @ Robertzombie : IZ needs all the separate .wav files in order to perform his aural surgery. You can't separate the drums and the vocals in a stereo file. To quote Mr. Spock : that defies logic (and for the Logic users around here : yeah, that too ). By the way, 50,000KBs is 50MB. So if there are more than two stereo files of that length in your project - and I assume there are - then you won't be able to upload the entire project in one go. You'd be better off putting all the .wav files on CD- R and send them to IZ by snail mail...
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
it shall be done ... (the snail mail bit)
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
In effing DEEDAhráyeph wrote:Indeed, Brother Blast . @ Robertzombie : IZ needs all the separate .wav files in order to perform his aural surgery. You can't separate the drums and the vocals in a stereo file. To quote Mr. Spock : that defies logic (and for the Logic users around here : yeah, that too ). By the way, 50,000KBs is 50MB. So if there are more than two stereo files of that length in your project - and I assume there are - then you won't be able to upload the entire project in one go. You'd be better off putting all the .wav files on CD- R and send them to IZ by snail mail...
Yes, sorry for that small misunderstanding there... I have been working with a lot of MIDI stuff of late, so I have people that can send me 48 tracks with YouSendIt, for the simple Reason (nice proggie, BTW) that a MIDI file is not as big as a WAV file
I need the separate files, yes. If you have 12 tracks, that should make at about 600 MB, which is a bit too much to send via the Webbie... I received Roberts PM already and the CDR is on its way to the Fair Country....
Now, to defy Mr.Spock and his sorry attempt at Vulcan logic: you COULD separate drums and vocals in a stereo WAV file of course... if the song consisted ONLY of vocals and drums, you could pan the vox L and the drums R, then use a Left/right-to-Stereo plugin and rip the track apart
Tssss...geekiness rules!
IZ.
Last edited by Izzy HaveMercy on 27 Nov 2006, 20:55, edited 1 time in total.
Better yet, maybe upload a short sample of the drums WAV and we can see if a remix is in order in the first place.
Assuming they're electronic drums, it should be easy enough to just re-record them if need be. It would be a shame if this didn't work out right cos it's definitely one of the most interesting and original Sisters cover versions of all time.
Assuming they're electronic drums, it should be easy enough to just re-record them if need be. It would be a shame if this didn't work out right cos it's definitely one of the most interesting and original Sisters cover versions of all time.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Not a bad thought sir! But I'd like a stab at the vocals as well, and I'm going to give the end-piano a snip and a nudge in the right direction So I need the whole bunch.mh wrote:Better yet, maybe upload a short sample of the drums WAV and we can see if a remix is in order in the first place.
Assuming they're electronic drums, it should be easy enough to just re-record them if need be. It would be a shame if this didn't work out right cos it's definitely one of the most interesting and original Sisters cover versions of all time.
Then again, maybe the drums were a bit overdone in mixing. If Robert posts a snippet of the source-drums, we can hear it indeed. Provided it is easy to find in that proggie he uses, I know in Cubase/Nuendo it is easy enuff...
IZ.
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
We should do a Battle thenDark wrote:Not so much a "remix" as a "vs"
IZ.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
Rerecording the drums would be a bit of a task...
I'll post a drum sample in a bit
I'll post a drum sample in a bit