Bastid! But I have LOTS of time heheeotunun wrote:Izzy HaveMercy wrote:321.500eotunun wrote:![]()
314.417
HAH!
IZ.489.417..
Had a tea while driving..![]()
![]()
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
IZ.
Bastid! But I have LOTS of time heheeotunun wrote:Izzy HaveMercy wrote:321.500eotunun wrote:![]()
314.417
HAH!
IZ.489.417..
Had a tea while driving..![]()
![]()
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Bastid! But I have LOTS of time heheeotunun wrote:Izzy HaveMercy wrote: 321.500
HAH!
IZ.489.417..
Had a tea while driving..![]()
![]()
IZ.
That bit I do understand, but I rather meant I don't understand why every company in the world seems to be after the MG marque rather than the rest of the lot ex-BLMC (or whatever name you'd like to give the group) had. What does it have others don't have?James Blast wrote:Believe it or not, but I did hire one of them (I was after a Golf or an Astra, long story) to ferry myself, Andrew S + Big Si down to leeds for Black Oktober 2. It was a very nice car chock full of gadgets, leather upholstry etc. But it drank petrol like it was going out of fashion and the acceleration sucked.
So, to sum up:
looked good
was very comfy
handled like a tank
guzzled petrolium
Nice one!eotunun wrote:Photobucket, Hm? Wait a minute-![]()
Just had to join open an account for the evidence:
But did you see the Highscorelist?
was the minerva as in the Belgium licenced copy of the Land Rover?Obviousman wrote:I never got the fuss about MG really
A Minerva and an Auburn (actually all ACD-cars), on the other hand are quite something indeed![]()
![]()
It is a DNEPR, which is even worse than an URAL.bushman*pm wrote:is that one of those kossack/ural type bike becaure it actually looks like one of those ultra rare Harley Davidson WWII bike (XD type i think!)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That was after the war indeed. IIRC the only licenser to really be allowed to fiddle about a bit with the car?bushman*pm wrote:was the minerva as in the Belgium licenced copy of the Land Rover?
i must put that anorak away one day!![]()
They went bankrupt because nobody ever needed to buy another Minerva. They were too goodObviousman wrote:[
Before the war they were the builders of astonishing cars, along the line of Rolls-Royce, Hispano-Suiza, Duesenberg and the likes, with Knight engines. Very fancy stuff! Sadly they went bankrupt
Though they were very good cars, that might be pushing it too far a bitradiojamaica wrote:They went bankrupt because nobody ever needed to buy another Minerva. They were too goodGreat stuff, Minerva
You won't be in Lier on 24/02/07 then Jürgen?eotunun wrote:![]()
Yes, I am bored, yes I do need a life. I know. But, IZ, beat that!