can they actually enforce that?

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
Post Reply
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16794
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6482979.stm
The BBC wrote:The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS) has warned its UK staff that they must have their primary bank account with the firm or face disciplinary action.

In a letter obtained by union Amicus, a senior executive told staff salaries must be paid into an RBS-run account.

"Failure to do so will represent a breach of group policy," it said.

The bank said its policy was in line with other leading banks but Amicus said it was taking legal advice, accusing RBS of "heavy-handedness".
is that legal?

very poor form :roll:
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17625
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

Is it fcuk!

That's like saying to a prof footy player that they are not allowed to support other teams right?
Or, if you work in mc donalds, you can only eat crap.
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
itnAklipse
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1541
Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
Location: set adrift
Contact:

Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
we've got beer and we've got fuel
User avatar
eotunun
Overbomber
Posts: 3730
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 22:24
Location: (X,Y,Z)(t)=huh!²

itnAklipse wrote:Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
For the first time I see no bit of an error in one of your postings. ;D
"These are my principles! And if you don't like the just says so, I have others, too!"
~Rufus T. Firefly
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16794
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

:lol:
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17625
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

eotunun wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
For the first time I see no bit of an error in one of your postings. ;D
Image
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
Al
Road Kill
Posts: 52
Joined: 09 May 2004, 02:06

It’s not an uncommon practice, I’m afraid.

I work with a bank, and on joining I had to open an account with my employer for my wages to be paid into, but at that time (about 10 years ago) I didn’t have many outgoings (or debt!) so it wasn’t too much bother. If managed correctly by a bank, it is probably an ideal way to manage sales opportunities within the workforce.

Whilst I also know of people moving accounts without any problems, my employer asks us to try and use their own ATM’s, to save costs to competitors – I reckon that’s just good housekeeping – it’s not forced.

However, I can understand the problems that arise with a takeover, especially for people who have worked with the original company for a considerable time. Without knowing the ins and outs, I would imagine that it wouldn’t be a term of their contract, and can’t really be enforceable.
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

eotunun wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
For the first time I see no bit of an error in one of your postings. ;D
I've read it four times now and I still don't understand it
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
User avatar
mh
Above the Chemist
Posts: 8122
Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 14:41
Location: A city built on rock 'n' roll

It's definitely an uncompetitive practice, but would probably require a test case to establish a definite legal position.

It's also a case of one's employer attempting to enforce an undue level of control over one's personal life.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
User avatar
Izzy HaveMercy
The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
Posts: 8844
Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Long Dark Forties
Contact:

eotunun wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
For the first time I see no bit of an error in one of your postings. ;D
Seconded! :notworthy:

IZ.
.
.
For Greater Good - Ambient Music for the Masses...
.
.
User avatar
Planet Dave
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6744
Joined: 22 Apr 2003, 23:51
Location: Where the streets fold round

First Direct enforce the same policy (about employee accounts, not eating crap).

It's a bad world and it smells funny. The smell's getting worse by the day.
'What a heavy load Einstein must have had. Morons everywhere.'
User avatar
eotunun
Overbomber
Posts: 3730
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 22:24
Location: (X,Y,Z)(t)=huh!²

James Blast wrote:
eotunun wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:Working in mcdonald's is such a breach of civility and ethics that i would suggest it only just they can only eat crap themselves for selling that stuff to others.
For the first time I see no bit of an error in one of your postings. ;D
I've read it four times now and I still don't understand it
Blame it on youth, age or the society?
Oderr would I be morre underrstandable when shpeaking wiss Akzent? ;D
"These are my principles! And if you don't like the just says so, I have others, too!"
~Rufus T. Firefly
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

That's ridiculous.

I suppose they could enforce "we'll only pay wages into one of our own accounts", but what's to stop an employee from opening an account elsewhere and setting up a payment to transfer all wages across every month? Or for that matter, from transferring their wages into the account they've had for years and gives them more "perks" than the work account?

They're just breeding resentment by enforcing a petty nonsensical rule. Way to boost staff morale guys!
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Johnny Rev 7.0
Banned
Posts: 1134
Joined: 09 Sep 2006, 22:15
Location: A place I go where no one knows

Don't bank workers have written into the T&Cs of their contracts that their level of borrowing repayments can't exceed a certain percentage of their salary? ie they're supposed to be setting an example to the rest of us.

Presumably by maintaining a main account with your banking employer, said employer can monitor your borrowings and repayments as per the terms of your contract.
What a season
to be beautiful
without a reason
User avatar
Mr Mercy
Road Kill
Posts: 89
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 01:16
Location: City of Sheffield, England

I totally agree with what markfiend has already said.
plus if RBS accounts are so good why do they feel the need to use forcefull tactics ?
User avatar
Mr Mercy
Road Kill
Posts: 89
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 01:16
Location: City of Sheffield, England

Johnny Rev 7.0 wrote:Don't bank workers have written into the T&Cs of their contracts that their level of borrowing repayments can't exceed a certain percentage of their salary? ie they're supposed to be setting an example to the rest of us.
These are the same banks that encourage us all to use credit cards.
the staff are emplyed to do a job not be some sort of investment marta!
User avatar
EvilBastard
Overbomber
Posts: 3932
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 17:48
Location: Where the Ruined Tower shouts

Alas, an employer can place almost any conditions on employment - you have to wear a suit, you have to do at least one weekend shift every 3 months, we will read all your emails, whatever. As long as the conditions cannot be proved to be unreasonable (like you have to sleep with the boss) then there's nothing that can be done about it. Bottom line: if you don't like the conditions, then feel free to seek alternative employment.
My current employer insists on background checks, drug tests, and read-only access to its employees' brokerage accounts. I may not like it, but if I want to work there then I have to suck it up.
Pista wrote:That's like saying to a prof footy player that they are not allowed to support other teams right?
Not quite - it's more like saying that if you play footy for Liverpool then we might ask some serious questions as to why you're a Leeds Utd season ticket holder. There are plenty of work-arounds - have an account to pay your salary into, and then a direct debit to pay it to another account, or withdraw almost everything from that account every month and pay it in somewhere else (they cannot tell you what to do with your money after they've paid it out).
"I won't go down in history, but I probably will go down on your sister."
Hank Moody
User avatar
6FeetOver
Childlike Empress
Posts: 7683
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: way on down south, New London town...
Contact:

Sounds like Big (f*cking) Brother to me. B@stards. :evil:
I left my heart in Ballycastle... :cry: :cry: :cry:
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

EvilBastard wrote:Bottom line: if you don't like the conditions, then feel free to seek alternative employment.
Word.

But it can be used as an excuse; IMO employers have a moral duty (although not a legal duty) not to be totally sh!tty to their employees.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
Post Reply