I may be thinking of the wrong incident, but weren't the photos of this noted to be remarkably similar to the US stealth bomber, which was in development at the time? It sparked a minor diplomatic row, which was all over the news, with the Belgians accusing the US of illegally testing their new aircraft in Belgian airspace. Even if this wasn't the same one, most cases of flying objects performing impossible manoeuvres can be explained by earth lights (see link in one of my previous posts).Ramone wrote:Case in point, In 1989, the Belgian Air force released at a press conference cockpit radar footage of an object that violated their air space and out flew their own jets and then dropped 10,000 feet in four seconds. A maneuver that would kill a human pilot. They didn't release the footage for ' kicks and giggles' they did so because they claimed they had no idea what it was that flying through their air space for which they had no defence against.
They're not evidence at all, precisely because there is no evidence of the Dropa stones. The photos were discredited, no-one else has ever found the caves or any of the supposed references and some of the people supposedly involved don't appear to exist. And the first mention of them was by Eric Von Daniken, who lied about his source.Ramone wrote:Plus, Google the the Dropa Stones. They're not a dodgy goth band, they are evidence that we may of been visited by some of the craft / objects that appear on the NASA tapes. You may shrug ya shoulders but it's worth a look all the same.
Because there's no reason to. Been there, done that, no benefit in going back. Disproving a laughable conspiracy theory is hardly top of NASA's or the US government's agenda. The world has changed and no-one can justify the expense. These days, people are generally questioning the entire space programme, saying the money could be better spent elsewhere. I'm not saying I agree, but they simply couldn't get away with another moon shot without a spectacularly good reason. And even if they were to go back, of course they wouldn't use the same materials and technology. Flying there with less computing power than a modern washing machine would be a foolish risk given what's available now.Ramone wrote:But to answer the original question about the moon landings being hoaxed..the answer if of course. Why have they not been back for decades and why don't they just do it again , but using the exact same materials and technology they used back in 1969?