TBH, I can't figure out why anyone would pay that sort of money for an itunes download anyway.
The quality of those are pretty shocking.
You'd be better off buying the CD or vinyl.
But it still has to be said, that although the profits for this travesty are going to charity, the content is utter crap.
& that's coming from a cureboi.
loudness wars split from Fat Bob topic
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Quoted for truth.Pista wrote:TBH, I can't figure out why anyone would pay that sort of money for an itunes download anyway.
The quality of those are pretty shocking.
One reason I could never understand why some people got their panties in a wad over 'stolen' mp3 downloads, it's hardly good quality. You'd do as well to record stuff off the radio.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
Or the telephone.markfiend wrote:You'd do as well to record stuff off the radio.
I think there´s a co evolution of MP3 playing cell phones and music going on:
The speakers of those phones have p*spoor sound quality, thus there´s no point in creating great soundscapes in products of music industries aiming on these players.
Thus the tracks sold are mainly rythm with a bit of blurp, and mainly try to gain their character from some rythmical phrasing rather than from real sound or melody.
Just a feeling I get sometimes, when a teen with one of those things with the tin can sound walks by, considering himself to be King Louis himself for having it.
The speakers of those phones have p*spoor sound quality, thus there´s no point in creating great soundscapes in products of music industries aiming on these players.
Thus the tracks sold are mainly rythm with a bit of blurp, and mainly try to gain their character from some rythmical phrasing rather than from real sound or melody.
Just a feeling I get sometimes, when a teen with one of those things with the tin can sound walks by, considering himself to be King Louis himself for having it.
"These are my principles! And if you don't like the just says so, I have others, too!"
~Rufus T. Firefly
~Rufus T. Firefly
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
You may be onto something there.
TBH my phone (when listened to through the headphones, not the speaker) is about as good sound-quality-wise as my iPod, but putting the iPod through my hi-fi ... well, it's not bad
TBH my phone (when listened to through the headphones, not the speaker) is about as good sound-quality-wise as my iPod, but putting the iPod through my hi-fi ... well, it's not bad
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Youngsters today prefer quantity over quality.
They don't give a rat's arse about 24 bit broadcast wav 96 yaddayadda.
Our cd is on iTunes and Rhapsody as well (plug!!), and sells quite good. The Americans ask 9.99 dollar for the album and we ask 10 euro. Not much of a difference.
But downloading our cd takes half an hour, getting rid of it two seconds.
Sending it to the US costs a lot of money and takes weeks.
Living the fast life or something...
IZ.
They don't give a rat's arse about 24 bit broadcast wav 96 yaddayadda.
Our cd is on iTunes and Rhapsody as well (plug!!), and sells quite good. The Americans ask 9.99 dollar for the album and we ask 10 euro. Not much of a difference.
But downloading our cd takes half an hour, getting rid of it two seconds.
Sending it to the US costs a lot of money and takes weeks.
Living the fast life or something...
IZ.
- moses
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 03 Sep 2008, 12:38
- Location: On The Darkside Of The Tune
I have been told that when cd's first came out the initial releases for some time where mostly expensive classical recordings therefore showing off the high quality available, whereas mp3's for ipods and phones were 'pop chart' music for teens with no discernible quality control necessary. Digital cameras where similar - expensive toys for kids but the resulting output was crap. We live in a throw-away society and should expect that what we pay for sh1t.markfiend wrote:You may be onto something there.
TBH my phone (when listened to through the headphones, not the speaker) is about as good sound-quality-wise as my iPod, but putting the iPod through my hi-fi ... well, it's not bad
Last edited by moses on 16 Sep 2008, 16:26, edited 1 time in total.
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
I seem to recall that soon after the earliest CD players came out, there were reputed to be more copies of 'Brothers In Arms' in circulation on CD than there were CD players. No idea if that's true, but it's a good story.
IIRC the KLF's guide-book to having a number 1 record says that you need to have your record sound good on a cheap transistor-radio, and bollocks to what it sounds like on audiophile hifi equipment.
IIRC the KLF's guide-book to having a number 1 record says that you need to have your record sound good on a cheap transistor-radio, and bollocks to what it sounds like on audiophile hifi equipment.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- moses
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 03 Sep 2008, 12:38
- Location: On The Darkside Of The Tune
How weird - my colleague hase just said that about dire Straits and has also said that studios have tiny litlle mono speakers to hear the mix in (as in a transistor radio)- auratones - which became known as Horrortones.markfiend wrote:I seem to recall that soon after the earliest CD players came out, there were reputed to be more copies of 'Brothers In Arms' in circulation on CD than there were CD players. No idea if that's true, but it's a good story.
IIRC the KLF's guide-book to having a number 1 record says that you need to have your record sound good on a cheap transistor-radio, and bollocks to what it sounds like on audiophile hifi equipment.
Last edited by moses on 16 Sep 2008, 16:40, edited 1 time in total.
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
- Syberberg
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 959
- Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 05:46
- Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Studios usually have several sets of speakers, from nearfield monitors (the best being Yamaha NS10s - now discontinued) to high end reference. Any good mix engineer/producer will burn off several mixes of the song/s onto a cd (or a tape) and play them on as many systems as possible, the best being the ones in his car. If it sounds good on a car audio system or a walkman, you've got the mix right. Then it's handed over to the label's A&R men who then hand it off to the mastering engineer to add the final polish. Which these days usually means the mastering house is told to make it as loud as possible (google "the loudness wars" for more info), which means brick wall limiting and a complete loss of dynamics, which makes the eventual "product" effing awful to listen to.moses wrote:How weird - my colleague hase just said that about dire Straits and has also said that studios have tiny litlle mono speakers to hear the mix in (as in a transistor radio)- auratones - which became known as Horrortones.markfiend wrote:I seem to recall that soon after the earliest CD players came out, there were reputed to be more copies of 'Brothers In Arms' in circulation on CD than there were CD players. No idea if that's true, but it's a good story.
IIRC the KLF's guide-book to having a number 1 record says that you need to have your record sound good on a cheap transistor-radio, and bollocks to what it sounds like on audiophile hifi equipment.
I could go on for ages about the lack of dynamics and how it adversely affects the listening experience, but I'll spare you the details.
And as Iz has already pointed out, the music buying public don't really give a toss, but don't understand why they don't like listening to their music collection for long periods of time.
Oh, nearly forgot, all speakers are (technically) mono, it's the output kit or recording that is either mono or stereo. Mono just means the recording has one channel and the play back a single signal path.
I don't necessarily agree with everything I think.
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
I remember we've discussed the loudness wars on HL previously.
IIRC not only are they mastering CDs with stupid levels of compression, they're actually amplifying them to the point that there's signal-clipping.
It's as if you were reading a book where the print went right to the edges of the page, and in fact the trimming (to get the book square) actually cut off a portion of the text. And you were expected not to notice.
IIRC not only are they mastering CDs with stupid levels of compression, they're actually amplifying them to the point that there's signal-clipping.
It's as if you were reading a book where the print went right to the edges of the page, and in fact the trimming (to get the book square) actually cut off a portion of the text. And you were expected not to notice.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
you need glasses for that fiendy
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
@fiendy.
I sometimes find it perverse that bootlegs (Take the recent Good Things for example) are actually better sounding than most commercially recorded material.
I sometimes find it perverse that bootlegs (Take the recent Good Things for example) are actually better sounding than most commercially recorded material.
- Syberberg
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 959
- Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 05:46
- Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
That's pretty much the nuts and bolts of it. Just got to add that as well as the print running to the edges of the page and then being cut, there's no punctuation, no paragraph breaks and it's all in full caps.markfiend wrote:I remember we've discussed the loudness wars on HL previously.
IIRC not only are they mastering CDs with stupid levels of compression, they're actually amplifying them to the point that there's signal-clipping.
It's as if you were reading a book where the print went right to the edges of the page, and in fact the trimming (to get the book square) actually cut off a portion of the text. And you were expected not to notice.
Damn, nearly derailed it.Pista wrote:Er back to Fat Bob.
I don't necessarily agree with everything I think.
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
I beg to differ on that aspect. Never understood the fuss about the NS 10. They have too much mid in my opinion. Although everyone I know working with them always says that 'when it sounds good on an NS10, it sounds good everywhere' because they have a very flat range (eg, not too much bass and quite a mid punch). Each to its own I guess, and if you know the 'failures' of your own monitors, they can work out quite fine indeed (my Tannoy Reveal Actives are a bit weak in the sub-bass, minus 60Hz or so, but I take that into account and use the spectrum analyser to check stuff).Syberberg wrote:nearfield monitors (the best being Yamaha NS10s - now discontinued)
Totally depends on what you ask the mastering engineer, but you are absolutely correct about the A&R men pushing master engineers to the limit, literally. Sadly enough, the loudness wars (linky for those too lazy to google ) just try to make new and inexperienced musicians believe that your album MUST be one louder than the other band. It's not usually the fault of the mastering engineer, more of the producer or the band label...Any good mix engineer/producer will burn off several mixes of the song/s onto a cd (or a tape) and play them on as many systems as possible, the best being the ones in his car. If it sounds good on a car audio system or a walkman, you've got the mix right. Then it's handed over to the label's A&R men who then hand it off to the mastering engineer to add the final polish. Which these days usually means the mastering house is told to make it as loud as possible (google "the loudness wars" for more info), which means brick wall limiting and a complete loss of dynamics, which makes the eventual "product" effing awful to listen to.
I'll give you the details then, in an animated piccyI could go on for ages about the lack of dynamics and how it adversely affects the listening experience, but I'll spare you the details.
We need to talk more often, shoptalk and stuffOh, nearly forgot, all speakers are (technically) mono, it's the output kit or recording that is either mono or stereo. Mono just means the recording has one channel and the play back a single signal path.
IZ.
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
I could do with a subwoofer, otherwise I am most happy with my (modest) sound system, in FACT! make that: fuckin' happy! x 25,000
and you can stick yer mp3/FLAC war up yer erses!
thankee
and you can stick yer mp3/FLAC war up yer erses!
thankee
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- Syberberg
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 959
- Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 05:46
- Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Very true. I suppose I should've qualified that There's an excellent article in this month's (September) issue of Sound On Sound about the NS10s. Unfortunately only available online for subscribers. Well worth the read though.Izzy HaveMercy wrote:I beg to differ on that aspect. Never understood the fuss about the NS 10. They have too much mid in my opinion. Although everyone I know working with them always says that 'when it sounds good on an NS10, it sounds good everywhere' because they have a very flat range (eg, not too much bass and quite a mid punch). Each to its own I guess, and if you know the 'failures' of your own monitors, they can work out quite fine indeed (my Tannoy Reveal Actives are a bit weak in the sub-bass, minus 60Hz or so, but I take that into account and use the spectrum analyser to check stuff).Syberberg wrote:nearfield monitors (the best being Yamaha NS10s - now discontinued)
My Samson Rubicon R5a's have a similar problem to your Reveals, I'll be getting the Sonalksis SV-517 EQ plug-in once I've upgraded my PC, it has a very good analyser, but it doesn't half chew up memory and processer (well, on this rather old machine it does).
No argument about that from me, I completely agree.Totally depends on what you ask the mastering engineer, but you are absolutely correct about the A&R men pushing master engineers to the limit, literally. Sadly enough, the loudness wars (linky for those too lazy to google ) just try to make new and inexperienced musicians believe that your album MUST be one louder than the other band. It's not usually the fault of the mastering engineer, more of the producer or the band label...
Good find!I'll give you the details then, in an animated piccy
Indeed we doWe need to talk more often, shoptalk and stuff
IZ.
I don't necessarily agree with everything I think.
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Oh, and just one more and then I stop hijacking the thread...
All of the above concerning loudness wars projected on the rockband RUSH and their albums
...a VERY interesting read!
IZ.
All of the above concerning loudness wars projected on the rockband RUSH and their albums
...a VERY interesting read!
IZ.
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Your wish is my command. I'll just lock it a second...
...unlocked and split.
...unlocked and split.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- weebleswobble
- Underneath the Rock
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 06:57
- Location: The Bat-Milk Cave
- Contact:
sorry, can't quite hear that linkQuiff Boy wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicbl ... c.too.loud
‎"We will wear some very loud shirts. We will wear some very wrong trousers."
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
Quiff Boy wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicbl ... c.too.loud
no shit Sherlock?Red Hot Chili Peppers' buffed-up Californication has been deemed unlistenable by plenty of commentators.
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- Quiff Boy
- Herr Administrator
- Posts: 16786
- Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Lurking and fixing
- Contact:
this just in from the ministry of the bleedin obviousJames Blast wrote:Quiff Boy wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicbl ... c.too.loudno shit Sherlock?Red Hot Chili Peppers' buffed-up Californication has been deemed unlistenable by plenty of commentators.
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?