1983 bootleg quality

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
Post Reply
User avatar
itnAklipse
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1541
Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
Location: set adrift
Contact:

Ave. i had a very disturbing realisation today as i noticed that the speed varies by 10% or so, very noticably, in many of my 1983 bootlegs, i think many of them are vinyl-transfers. For example London 19.2. is way too fast, as is Brussels 30.8., and then of course Possession (Amsterdam 28.8.) seems way too slow. They didn't all the time play the songs at different speeds did they (depending on the dosage of the night? :) ).
Hmm...Oh, the one i've used as reference recording is London 29.6.83, since i have a video of it and the way it sounds also "makes sense" more than the faster versions.

So what i'd like to know is...am i right, that the bootlegs really are wrong speed, and it's not that they just played different speed? And if so, then .. is there anything one can do about? Has anyone made adjustments to their versions...i'd be hard-pressed to know how to go on about it. Is it possible to obtain these gigs in their right speed at all? If they are transferred from vinyls, then why is there a speed problem?

Any clarification and even help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time, people.

dei
we've got beer and we've got fuel
User avatar
CellThree
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1730
Joined: 14 Feb 2003, 22:05
Location: 4200 miles from my record collection
Contact:

It is possible. If someone is using a bog standard record player to transfer the vinyl to the computer then there may be a slight difference in speed. Better record player have got the light things at the edge so you can make adjustments to make sure the record is playing exactly at 33 or 45rpm.

Also, if a bootleg has been copied to tape, the tape recordingf speed may be faster/ slower then it should be causing more speed differences.

Another way to check would be to make sure your guitar is tuned correctly and see if you can play the songs ok in tune with the record. Most of the songs are in the key of A. If this is out then I suspect that the recording is either faster or slower than it should be.
24.24.2.489 Deceased
User avatar
jenzi-benzi
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: between hot metal...

there is another way:
rip the cds or what ever to wav files then load them into wavelab.
you you fix the speed as like you like...
Do I drive or am I driven?
User avatar
itnAklipse
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1541
Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
Location: set adrift
Contact:

Ok...thank you both. Now i know what i'll have to do while the rainy autumn nights :)

dei
we've got beer and we've got fuel
User avatar
Dan
Overbomber
Posts: 2014
Joined: 25 Sep 2002, 01:00
Location: Leeds

When tapes are copied, no 2 cassette decks are EXACTLY the same speed, so a copy of a tape will be slower or faster than the original. Even the same tape played twice on the same tape deck won't be the same played twice. (As an experiment, play a cassette on your tape deck. Use a stopwatch to time it. Now rewind and time it again. It won't be the exact same length. Maybe different by just a few seconds.)

I recently speed corrected Camden Palace 12.8.83 as the one most people have runs for around 34 minutes and it sounds way to slow. New version is 30 minutes and sounds much better.
Post Reply