I'm already blonde - and I didn't starve all those years of doing theatre to not be able to manage the accent!stufarq wrote:Blonde wig, posh accent. I'll give it a bash if no-one else is up for it.
Don't have the teeth, though...
I'm already blonde - and I didn't starve all those years of doing theatre to not be able to manage the accent!stufarq wrote:Blonde wig, posh accent. I'll give it a bash if no-one else is up for it.
One of my favourite bands, Trouble, have been through the major label mill and are now self funding their albums so its not just the giants. The problems Trouble are running into are in CD distribution - they sold a fair few copies in Europe but have failed to get the disc released in the US (where they're from). People are still buying at import prices though.RobF wrote:People even mentioned that U2 and REM are going to self-release their new albums, of course they are, they could buy the moon, Eldritch can't.
Smallstone wrote:Basically the press story would be - where the f**k have you been for the past 15 years? Sadly if you're not appearing in the mainstream press you don't exist - to the world as a whole. All the touring they've done since say....1996/97 has been to as folks have said here repeatedly a decreasing loyal core fan base - and has passed the media by - on the whole (the odd review here and there). The part I'm guessing he doesn't want to engage in is - pleasing the press or playing the whole PR game.... Dull press trips. Two weeks travelling around Europe speaking to journos - can't say I blame him. Essentially going from territory by territory explaining - where he's been. Gets kinda dull.
Radio won't play a new Sisters single - outside of maybe ya specialist shows. TV wouldn't show a video again aside from maybe ya Scuzz's and Kerrangs of this world - but then Myspace and Youtube kind of make for that.... 'cept you don't see any money back really - even from PRS/Publishing etc.
Thing is - he could make a bit more cash from player bigger shows IF he actually released a bit of product ... The press generated would mean that folks would buy tickets to shows 'cos they read about them in - Uncut or something (I'm being UK-centric here).... Things is IT IS an interesting story... thats the irony. 80s Cult star turns back on the music business....waits 15+ years until fans start despairing...
Yeah a nice CD - packaged well, super jewel case or digipack, 60-70p each. Something fancier - a case bound book, 30-40 pages - maybe an extra CD of mixes or live stuff - double that and maybe a bit more. CDS sell for £10 in store these days - ya fancier ones maybe £11-12 - limit it to 10K - get the fanbase out. HMV, Play.com, Amazon and ya indies. Wouldn't trouble the supermarkets I think. It's perfectly do-able - the figures bandied about for CD runs aren't widly off the mark - you;d be talking in the 1000s not 10 of 1000s... Smaller market - recession - illegal downloading - ageing fanbase. The market has totally changed in even the last 3-5 years let alone 15 +.
He'd have to do it independently - and I'm convinced it's the best way. Find a receptive indepependent distributor and cut a P&D deal.
The retail costs gets stumped up by your disributor - your racking in store and ads in magazines etc. People who do the 'buying' know who he is.
PR is expensive upfront - but worth the outlay. You sort out your embarassingly bad website and agree to talk to the press a bit.
Age shouldn't be an issue - but it is. He's 50 and he hasn't made a record since his mid-30s. Paul Wellers 50 and Nick Caves 51. They're his contempories - but they're never stopped releasing music. Playing live isn't enough to sustain interest.
Well, one has to do something stimulating with one's precious spare time, what little there is of it...Smallstone wrote: Ah - this is like fantasy music business.. - you could market this as a board game !
Right -he was supposed to be from Belgium, I forgot!Smallstone wrote:Heh heh I thought of Pepe Le Punk as I tapped away at my missive - but I didn't want to upset our friends in Benelux! Please the press in Belgium as Sir Moz once sung.... Important territory!
No not really.Smallstone wrote:Simply put - no he couldn't do that. It would be an enormous job for him to do on his 'own'. The thing is Play.com/Amazon/HMV indies etc WILL want a new SOM album - logistics of this would be more than a one man (or cottage style industry) show could cover. He'd need distribution and someone collecting the money. This isn't like playing live - with payment at the end of the night. These folks will expect 30-60 days payment. Credit essentially. Online sales of which iTunes make up the lion share work v similar.
.
No, it wouldn't. The structure is completely different now, with companies taking care of merchandise sales and distribution etc more or less for you., for a share of the profits.Smallstone wrote:Simply put - no he couldn't do that. It would be an enormous job for him to do on his 'own'.
Wrong again. The logistics aren't burdensome at all.Smallstone wrote: The thing is Play.com/Amazon/HMV indies etc WILL want a new SOM album - logistics of this would be more than a one man (or cottage style industry) show could cover.
Smallstone wrote: He'd need distribution and someone collecting the money. This isn't like playing live - with payment at the end of the night. These folks will expect 30-60 days payment. Credit essentially.
iTunes aren't that profitable to small labels or to artists who go the DIY route. Better to handle that yourself though your website. Again, it's easy to set up, cheap, and doesn't require much administration.Smallstone wrote: Online sales of which iTunes make up the lion share work v similar.
Well, who knows. The way AE is handling stuff with the SoE certainly points in that direction.Smallstone wrote: And contractually - but he seems to still own the name. There is nothing it would seem that contractually stops him from releasing any new SOM material.
And I kinda don't chuckle, having considerable knowledge of how things sometimes goes legally (and sometimes illegally). Mind you, I'm not saying that it's only the label's fault that things go sour sometimes, only that I know how very well how (absurdly) far these things sometimes go.Smallstone wrote: I kinda chuckle when folks talk about East West and 'evil' labels.
That has nothing whatsoever to do with the situation contract wise.Smallstone wrote: Personnel wise - I doubt anyone who was at East West 15 years ago is still there.
Correct. And just as a good relationship can either carry over to the "new regime" or turn bad, so can a bad relationship. Especially if it has to do with legal troubles over breeches/alleged breeches of contract. Then it continues forever as a matter of principle, and is in the hands of the legal department. Again, not that unusual.Smallstone wrote: Maybe the moody doorman? major labels have regular culls of key staff - thats half their problem. You end up dealing with a new regime - eager to stamp their authority - and who inevitably you didn't sign with in the first place. It's all a game of corporate musical chairs at this level - another tired old story. Folks like George Michael, Prince and Weller have gone through this. Folks like Damon Albarn and Lilly Allen are going through it now with EMI. Thats what 'could' have happened with the East West 'strike'.
Well put.il duce wrote: Bauhaus went into a studio, recorded a album and gave it to a good independent distributor. And yeah, they were not played on the radio or had adds in the paper, and a wall in Times Square, but the fans found it, and the recordstores got it. So did the mp3 places. I think that is all anyone that has been away for 15 years and do not do interviews can ask for.
Wouldn't it be in his best interest to keep his pension scheme happy?Yggdrasil wrote: But on the subject of Von "owing" the fans, I think you're wrong. He doesn't owe us anything. We voluntarily bought the records, didn't we? He can do what he damn well pleases.
Why will they? Fifteen years ago that would have been true but now the world beyond HL is hardly waiting with baited breath.Smallstone wrote:The thing is Play.com/Amazon/HMV indies etc WILL want a new SOM album
I think you're wrong about the cost. And if 10K isn't enough, 30K gets you a lot of high quality studio time. Remember that recording technology now is way more advanced and much more affordable (orders of magnitude, actually) compared to the nineties.RobF wrote: He can't afford to record a suitable product, there's no way out of that. A sisters album recorded for £10,000 would sound like an embarrassing bag of toss, no matter what the potential of the tunes.
Your handle says it all, my friend...theyoungbrain wrote:has anyone considered that eldritch might just be a bit of a cock? cutting off his nose to spite his face?
I've run a label, I have put out quite a few records (both CD, vinyl and download only), I've also developed the first all-digital music store in the world, as well as several other breakthrough websites (including film sites, music video sites, etc etc). I work as a media strategist and have worked with some of the largest companies in the world. My background is media production and concept development, with 25 years of experience.Smallstone wrote:
To Yggrdasil - some interesting points - but I disagree with most of what you say - but then I've worked in distribution at an independent for 10 years and I approach this from that perspective.... It's just the way I am... I greatly admire the DIY aesthetic and I have to put my cards on the table I'm no fan of the majors. In the UK/mainland Europe/US.... anywhere. Firm believer that the best music comes out of the indies.
I'm not sure what your background is - or how you know it would be easy to run a label on his own -
Yggdrasil wrote:50 quid?Harvey Winston wrote:Any ideas on how much it cost to record The Reptile House?
And I still love it!
That's the smartest thing you have ever said.Harvey Winston wrote:Yggdrasil wrote:50 quid?Harvey Winston wrote:Any ideas on how much it cost to record The Reptile House?
And I still love it!
you'd have to have ears of cloth not to
I was with you up until the Albini part - that's just unpleasant.il duce wrote:I have given up arguing this. And everyone has come with really interesting and well thoughthrough points. It has been a pleasure. Thank you!
I just have one more thing to say.
I love Sisters andI DO NOT want a polished turd of a commercial album. I would absolutely love a dirty, nasty rock'n roll album, and I think this band can do it. And so what If Vons voice is not what it used to be. If they can record and present to me something like the liveshow, I would be more than happy.
Fot godsake, record the album with Steve Albini and I will come in my pants.
Nuff said.