Temple of Love 1983 or 1992

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
Post Reply

Temple of Love 1983 or 1992

1983
21
51%
1992
8
20%
Both
12
29%
 
Total votes: 41
User avatar
Big Si
School Bully
Posts: 6747
Joined: 19 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: Glesga Central

Well? 1983 for me!
Wyrd bið ful aræd...

mybelgiannemesis
User avatar
Silver_Owl
The Don
Posts: 7498
Joined: 27 Sep 2003, 18:52

Big Si wrote:Well? 1983 for me!
Here here. Hold the Ofra Haza tahnks.
We forgive as we forget
As the day is long.
User avatar
pikkrong
Overbomber
Posts: 3929
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 01:00
Location: Estonia

83 :von:
do i drive
or am i driven
User avatar
Angelchild
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 383
Joined: 12 Oct 2003, 20:47
Location: Durham in the Grim North East

83 Deffo. I remember seeing 92 on TOTP and thinking oh my God.
It's nothing personal to poor Ofra, but just doesn't compare to 83.
"Ohne deine hilfe verliere
Ich mich in diesem ort"
User avatar
Lars Svensson
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 303
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Railway Cuttings, East Cheam

S'gotta be 83...

The 92 version is just, as the m*****n might have said by excavating another cliche from the Concise Unimiginative Sayings Dictionary, Beyond The Pale.

It was a nice idea in principle...but it was a tad overblown. Wasn't even THAT good a song in the first place. (Heresy!)
Amused to death...
User avatar
Padstar
Utterly Bastard Smurph
Posts: 1800
Joined: 26 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Purplerainsville, UK
Contact:

92 you flippin nutters !

Paddy
Still playing guitar - sometimes weird shaped ones.
User avatar
hallucienate
Overbomber
Posts: 4602
Joined: 17 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
Contact:

This is a tough one, I really like both of 'em. 83 is gonzoid and rocks like a mo-fo. 92 broods a bit more. I got nothing against Ofra either.
User avatar
Silence is platinum
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1209
Joined: 11 May 2003, 19:15
Location: At the end of the pier

no doubt about that one:

1992 for ever and ever
User avatar
Black Planet
Andrew's Love Goddess
Posts: 2170
Joined: 02 Jun 2003, 20:16

Padstar wrote:92 you flippin nutters !

Paddy
:notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:

I'm with Paddy on this one. The 1992 version is a Masterpiece. I love it I love it I love it!!!~!!!

:innocent: :von:

and now I want More! :wink:
User avatar
Erudite
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1954
Joined: 24 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: Lost In Space

I find it hard to choose.
92 is the better record but it's kinda been played to death in a lot clubs
I used to hang out in.

But anything's better than the cut down piece of crap Von plays live now.

The Smurphs actually play that song a helluva lot better. :von: ;D
You are what you drink - I'm a bitter man!
User avatar
Andy TG
Overbomber
Posts: 2588
Joined: 30 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Wherever I Am At The Time......

I have always thought that a version that is made up of the first "Half" of 83 and the later "Half" of 92 would be a great version! :-)

This would also 'stump' anyone dancing to 'it' in a club - in the same way as the English version of Rammstein's "Du Hast" - You should have seen their face when I used to play that whilst Djing! ;-)
This Is Not Ordinary S & M
This Is M & S S & M
User avatar
Nancy_78
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 183
Joined: 21 Aug 2003, 23:31
Location: Zagreb/Croatia/Europe

Both.

Because each is eligible for the time it's been done.Its 1983's vesrion sounds unbeliavably strong for the 80s while that 1992's one sounds as equally strong in the 90s context.Both are simply timeless.
Andrew Eldritch wrote: "I'm actually quite a decent bastard..." (New Musical Express, February 27th 1988)
User avatar
mh
Above the Chemist
Posts: 8124
Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 14:41
Location: A city built on rock 'n' roll

83, the short version (as always round my way)
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
User avatar
Black Shuck
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 848
Joined: 05 Feb 2003, 14:02
Location: Sitting in a sleazy snack bar, sucking sickly sausage rolls
Contact:

Ugh, how can any of you prefer the horrible '83 version? it's tedious, po-faced goth nonsense
Gazza for England manager
User avatar
Big Si
School Bully
Posts: 6747
Joined: 19 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: Glesga Central

Black Shuck wrote:Ugh, how can any of you prefer the horrible '83 version? it's tedious, po-faced goth nonsense
Nah Shucky, it rocks like Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth :twisted:
Wyrd bið ful aræd...

mybelgiannemesis
Post Reply