http://www.diorhomme.com/
thanks to sita for pointing this one out
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/lolol.gif)
![We are not worthy! :notworthy:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
![We are not worthy! :notworthy:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Are you talking to sita or to me?Bartek wrote:i got to ask this question: from where you get about all this ridiculous thing ? d'ya non-stop searching the net for that ?
christophe wrote:is the som backcatalogue getting that cheap?
I think it's great that they're getting this kind of exposure. The Sisters were always about being 50% prostitute anyway.Being645 wrote:christophe wrote:is the som backcatalogue getting that cheap?... cheap? It's long overdue fashion designers discovered The Sisters ...
...
It were silly, rather, if one didn't ask ...Sita wrote:I admit being silly, but ridiculous? No way![]()
Sita wrote: Maybe Lagerfeld always liked them, there is a certain resemblance (->)
Of course all by the means of willBeing645 wrote:... yeah, since Lagerfeld has lost quite a few stones in weight ... all by the means of will ...
...
Always liked Lagerfeld. When that happened and I heard his comments, I immediately thought, he had discovered The Sisters ......
And he had been in such a long lull with himself before ......
I don't care about that (as long as the band is in charge and not the 'company' behind it)mh wrote:I think it's great that they're getting this kind of exposure. The Sisters were always about being 50% prostitute anyway.Being645 wrote:christophe wrote:is the som backcatalogue getting that cheap?... cheap? It's long overdue fashion designers discovered The Sisters ...
...
![]()
Ah, but I don't see them using Big Black do I? (Although their version of The Model would be hilarious here).christophe wrote:I don't care about that (as long as the band is in charge and not the 'company' behind it)mh wrote:I think it's great that they're getting this kind of exposure. The Sisters were always about being 50% prostitute anyway.Being645 wrote:... cheap? It's long overdue fashion designers discovered The Sisters ...
...
![]()
but I guess they would have to pay some sorth of fee in order get the rights to use the tune...?
and I presume the more popular the band, the more expensive it gets.
so the more logical conclusion would be that if someone would use the music of a old B-klass 80's band (how popular where they for the general audience?) it would be just because these would be cheaper.
I think tsom are a good choice for something like this because I think a lot of people know the songs when they hear them but don't really know them.mh wrote:Ah, but I don't see them using Big Black do I? (Although their version of The Model would be hilarious here).christophe wrote:I don't care about that (as long as the band is in charge and not the 'company' behind it)mh wrote: I think it's great that they're getting this kind of exposure. The Sisters were always about being 50% prostitute anyway.![]()
but I guess they would have to pay some sorth of fee in order get the rights to use the tune...?
and I presume the more popular the band, the more expensive it gets.
so the more logical conclusion would be that if someone would use the music of a old B-klass 80's band (how popular where they for the general audience?) it would be just because these would be cheaper.
Absolutely seconded ... there are so many people like that ...mh wrote: I think tsom are a good choice for something like this because I think a lot of people know the songs when they hear them but don't really know them. just my opinion though.
well I did know dior isn't booze, but now you mention lagerfeld I'm not so sure anymoreBeing645 wrote:and it's the same with DIOR ... as soon as people hear the name Lagerfeld, they realize what it's about ...
when and where did this happen?Vision Thing is a thing of the 90ies and this record had a deep impact
on the decade as a whole
d'ya always get everything personally ?Being645 wrote:Are you talking to sita or to me?Bartek wrote:i got to ask this question: from where you get about all this ridiculous thing ? d'ya non-stop searching the net for that ?![]()
They were only "B" insofar as Madonna and Michael Jackson were the "A".christophe wrote:I'm a young pup, I know thisand I have gotten to know tsom in the 2000s so I have not lived trough their peak moment but I never have gotten the impression the general audience really know them, ever.
Bartek wrote:d'ya always get everything personally ?Being645 wrote:Are you talking to sita or to me?Bartek wrote:i got to ask this question: from where you get about all this ridiculous thing ? d'ya non-stop searching the net for that ?![]()
replay to prove me point.
It's just... strange. And not that "good kind" of strangemethadrine wrote:Seeing models walking like chickens to Temple of Love is not going to be something I chalk up on Ye Olde "Epic Moments" tablet. Glad I turned it off before ToL lost its touch.