80's vs 90's & 2000's

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
Post Reply
User avatar
10-E Rabid
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 203
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 23:36
Location: My Home

Been thinking a little too hard lately, but does anyone see much better sound recording's of Sisters gigs in the 80's compared to today's technology. Am I missing something? I wasn't sure were to post this either; here or in the sharing section. Anyway, I'm listening to boots like Gimme Shelter, Silence is Platinum, Trojan Horse etc and they sound much better than what is recently recorded. Maybe its time for some new speakers or something. :? :?
"Go forth and become a happy cabbage"
User avatar
sultan2075
Overbomber
Posts: 2379
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 19:17
Location: Washington, D. C.
Contact:

A lot of them are soundboard recordings.
--
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.
Bartek
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6141
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 10:47

exactly. and according to rumors floating in air many given by :von:
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

it's all pish, sorry :|

and yes, you think too hard
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
User avatar
Big Si
School Bully
Posts: 6747
Joined: 19 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: Glesga Central

...and featured better setlists tae :innocent:
Wyrd bið ful aræd...

mybelgiannemesis
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

varied even...
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
User avatar
10-E Rabid
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 203
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 23:36
Location: My Home

Soundboard eh? Well then, that explains it. Never thought of that. No wonder you can't hear the crowd yakking as clearly as others. And thank you Mr. Blast, I know...
"Go forth and become a happy cabbage"
User avatar
frederik
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 454
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 14:37
Location: above the dentist

sultan2075 wrote:A lot of them are soundboard recordings.
much less than you would think though :wink:
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4966
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

James Blast wrote:varied even...
sadly, not really after say 1983. 1984 for each tour remained pretty much the same, 1985, with the exceptions of the specials meant for filming Blackburn, Leeds, Newcastle had the same set. the set lists are actually more varied now than ever before (if you take the latest two gigs as an example)
Goths have feelings too
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4966
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

frederik wrote:
sultan2075 wrote:A lot of them are soundboard recordings.
much less than you would think though :wink:
agreed, i think for the 'famous' tapers it was an artform, a real risk and generally they had the contacts to get decent positions, technical acumen etc

recently anybody can have a go, and are generally keen to share their efforts, so the better recordings remain off radar, or in the trader circle - Leeds 2003 and a few other European gigs excepting *

* talking really top quality, there are lots of very good things to be had :notworthy:
Goths have feelings too
User avatar
itnAklipse
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1541
Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
Location: set adrift
Contact:

paint it black wrote:* talking really top quality, there are lots of very good things to be had :notworthy:
Like some, but few, have actually done, they could think about putting some of them on ebay... ;) It'd be no different than tapers selling their stuff at record fairs in the 80s. And majority of the recordings available to buy these days isn't any better than what's shared...ie. simply not worth it. From 2000s, i know of exactly two outstanding recordings being sold - and even the last one was a few years back (that said, by no means do i scour ebay even every quarter, so it's quite possible i've missed some.)
we've got beer and we've got fuel
User avatar
million voices
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1005
Joined: 10 May 2006, 22:31
Location: The Ballrooms Of Mars

I never saw the Sisters in the eighties, but I did see a lot of other bands and I reckon that the reason the Boots sound so crap these days is because the noise coming out of the speakers is so bad. Whether this is a deliberate policy to cover up the fact that Eldo can't sing so good these days or, the more unlikely, they have the worst sound system of any band I have seen in my life, ever. On every occasion they can sound s**t. From pub bands to Rock City to the NEC nobody has a worst sound - this cannot be by accident.
Well you must know something
'Cos we're dying of admiration here
Mastering obscure alternatives
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17629
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

Not sure I fully agree with that.
There are a few SBDs from earlier on & yes they are bl00dy good.
But they'd be a feck sight better with a bit of mastering before being unleashed.

There are modern recordings that sound fantastic though.
The Artmania show that Eggi shared for example.

What you need to look for when choosing a bootleg (hate that term) is the taper &/or the gear used.

That usually only falls apart when the source (the band) sound cr@p themselves.
A good example is BC's recording of Seattle 2008.
BC's recordings are some of the best recordings I have ever heard. The Cure stuff he's taped has been nothing short of incredible in terms of quality.
Same gear, same bloke, different source.

His note on the Seattle 2008 show
Notes: Really poor vocal mix during this show.
Musically it still sounds really quite nice, but he didn't bother putting any work into EQ-ing or anything, due to being p!ssed at the fact there was practically no vocal level at all.
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
million voices
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1005
Joined: 10 May 2006, 22:31
Location: The Ballrooms Of Mars

The quality of audience recorded bootlegs should get better over time. The sound that comes out the PA is better and the equipment used to record it is better. Easy example being the comparison of Ziggy boots to Reality boots. A lot of the Reality boots are nearly as good as the original "Stage", whereas most of the Ziggy are "For Serious Collectors Only"
The sound that comes out of the PA at Sisters gigs nowadays is awful and that is why the boots sound awful
Well you must know something
'Cos we're dying of admiration here
Mastering obscure alternatives
User avatar
Silver_Owl
The Don
Posts: 7498
Joined: 27 Sep 2003, 18:52

They didn't do rain from Heaven in the bloody 80's. ;D
We forgive as we forget
As the day is long.
User avatar
mh
Above the Chemist
Posts: 8124
Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 14:41
Location: A city built on rock 'n' roll

Oh, there are plenty of crap recordings from the 80s too if you go looking hard enough. ;D
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17629
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

million voices wrote: The sound that comes out of the PA at Sisters gigs nowadays is awful and that is why the boots sound awful
Not all of them.

Try
Brussels 2009 (CH version)
Toronto 2008 (MZ N1 source)
Tienen (JS' utterly astonishing version)
Bologna 2008 (Microtrack source)
One of the Zottegem 2007 recordings
Bratislava 2006 (CE i think)
Madrid 2006 (still my fave recording from that tour)
Practically all the 2005 shows
Bonn 2001

& there are more.......
Sure, the source needs to be good & a lot of the later shows are not the best quality, but some are stunning.
Okay, they're not SBDs, but sometimes SBDs can be really "dry" without the crowd. They are concerts after all.
& also, don't forget, the recordings can be manipulated/ re-mastered to make the optimum product, but if you expect every single master to sound wonderful, then you'll be disappointed.

On the original point of the topic, I don't think the quality of the recordings are worse than those back in the 90's. If anything, they are better.
It's just the "subject matter" that is occasionally somewhat lacking.

;D
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17629
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

mh wrote:Oh, there are plenty of crap recordings from the 80s too if you go looking hard enough. ;D

Zackerly!
eg
The_Sisters_of_Mercy_1984-05-26_Hague
Okay. A crisp enough recording, but Andrew. Please write lyrics before performing songs. :innocent:
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
Llamatron
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 120
Joined: 20 Aug 2004, 13:50

I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live. They sounded no worse than anything else I've seen in the last place I saw them- where everything sounds pretty s**t- and better than... well, any metal band I've seen there when I still went to such things, for one. :lol: The noise coming off the stage ain't bad at all. It's not exactly a secret Mr. E's more of a "character" vocalist than a singer, especially these days. He was never a technically accomplished vocalist and never made a point of disguising it- Floodland's production exempted. :lol:
Left at the dead badger.
User avatar
Jan
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2002, 01:00
Location: in a corner of a foreign field
Contact:

million voices wrote:Bonn 2001
Eh? The ones I know are quite... unspectacular.
"For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal." (John F. Kennedy, 1963)
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live.
Actually, I haven't and I am being entirely honest and serious here. I've been going to gigs since 1974 too. :|

it's shabby and not nice on the poor erses that still pay to see them :| :|
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
Twisted Perspective
Road Kill
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Oct 2009, 14:53

Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live. They sounded no worse than anything else I've seen in the last place I saw them- where everything sounds pretty s**t- and better than... well, any metal band I've seen there when I still went to such things, for one. :lol: The noise coming off the stage ain't bad at all. It's not exactly a secret Mr. E's more of a "character" vocalist than a singer, especially these days. He was never a technically accomplished vocalist and never made a point of disguising it- Floodland's production exempted. :lol:
These days he sounds more like Vic Reeves doing his "Northern Club Singer" routine:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXJmPttN ... re=related
centurionofprix
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 538
Joined: 25 Jun 2010, 18:44
Location: Finland

James Blast wrote:
Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live.
Actually, I haven't and I am being entirely honest and serious here. I've been going to gigs since 1974 too. :|

it's shabby and not nice on the poor erses that still pay to see them :| :|
That's not fair. They've been great this year, though they did give some p*ss poor shows a while ago.
User avatar
Sita
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 894
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 15:45

Agreed centurion, I love the 2010 gigs :D
Post Reply