![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
sadly, not really after say 1983. 1984 for each tour remained pretty much the same, 1985, with the exceptions of the specials meant for filming Blackburn, Leeds, Newcastle had the same set. the set lists are actually more varied now than ever before (if you take the latest two gigs as an example)James Blast wrote:varied even...
agreed, i think for the 'famous' tapers it was an artform, a real risk and generally they had the contacts to get decent positions, technical acumen etcfrederik wrote:much less than you would think thoughsultan2075 wrote:A lot of them are soundboard recordings.
Like some, but few, have actually done, they could think about putting some of them on ebay...paint it black wrote:* talking really top quality, there are lots of very good things to be had
Musically it still sounds really quite nice, but he didn't bother putting any work into EQ-ing or anything, due to being p!ssed at the fact there was practically no vocal level at all.Notes: Really poor vocal mix during this show.
Not all of them.million voices wrote: The sound that comes out of the PA at Sisters gigs nowadays is awful and that is why the boots sound awful
mh wrote:Oh, there are plenty of crap recordings from the 80s too if you go looking hard enough.
Eh? The ones I know are quite... unspectacular.million voices wrote:Bonn 2001
Actually, I haven't and I am being entirely honest and serious here. I've been going to gigs since 1974 too.Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live.
These days he sounds more like Vic Reeves doing his "Northern Club Singer" routine:Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live. They sounded no worse than anything else I've seen in the last place I saw them- where everything sounds pretty s**t- and better than... well, any metal band I've seen there when I still went to such things, for one.The noise coming off the stage ain't bad at all. It's not exactly a secret Mr. E's more of a "character" vocalist than a singer, especially these days. He was never a technically accomplished vocalist and never made a point of disguising it- Floodland's production exempted.
That's not fair. They've been great this year, though they did give some p*ss poor shows a while ago.James Blast wrote:Actually, I haven't and I am being entirely honest and serious here. I've been going to gigs since 1974 too.Llamatron wrote:I've heard way, way worse than The Sisters live.![]()
it's shabby and not nice on the poor erses that still pay to see them![]()