Science schmience
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/scientists-pro ... 50760.html
So much for relativity
- moses
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 03 Sep 2008, 12:38
- Location: On The Darkside Of The Tune
'This doesn't mean Albert Einstein was wrong, any more than his theory of Special Relativity meant Isac Newton was wrong. '
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
If it turn out to be true it will mean that Einstein was right about atoms. He didn't got same tools and knowledge like Mr and Mrs from CERN.
Now that I want to see!Dr Whitehouse said the findings technically meant that time travel might be possible.
The Alternative Paint Cabaret
http://paintcabaret.weebly.com
http://www.facebook.com/The.Alternative.Paint.Cabaret
http://www.youtube.com/user/PaintCabaret
http://paintcabaret.weebly.com
http://www.facebook.com/The.Alternative.Paint.Cabaret
http://www.youtube.com/user/PaintCabaret
- Nikolas Vitus Lagartija
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 23:35
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
I think I saw a film about that back in the 80's.Salome wrote:Now that I want to see!Dr Whitehouse said the findings technically meant that time travel might be possible.
As for Einstein - anyone can make a wee mistake.
- timsinister
- The Oncoming Storm
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: 04 Jan 2005, 17:08
- Location: Newcastle
- Contact:
There could be a wealth of alternative explanations - extradimensional transference, or maybe a new form of energy field we haven't yet encountered...
The possibilities are endless! We live in exciting times.
The possibilities are endless! We live in exciting times.
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
The smart money is on it being an error in the measurements.
*Edit to add: seems xkcd agrees with me:
Anyone want to bet $200?
*Edit to add: seems xkcd agrees with me:
Anyone want to bet $200?
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
No but it'll be interesting to see how it turns out. And it should remind us all that many absolute scientific truths only remain true until someone comes up with a better truth. The world ain't flat any more either.moses wrote:'This doesn't mean Albert Einstein was wrong, any more than his theory of Special Relativity meant Isac Newton was wrong. '
Yes, and that is what we call 'progress'.
and btw.- I just bought 'brief history of time'; it looks that I can throw it now.
and btw.- I just bought 'brief history of time'; it looks that I can throw it now.
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
"We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here" said the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- moses
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 03 Sep 2008, 12:38
- Location: On The Darkside Of The Tune
There are no truths in science, only questions and theoriesstufarq wrote: No but it'll be interesting to see how it turns out. And it should remind us all that many absolute scientific truths only remain true until someone comes up with a better truth. The world ain't flat any more either.
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Technically that is the case, but...moses wrote:There are no truths in science, only questions and theories
If (and it's a big if) the result is confirmed, and the neutrinos really were travelling faster than light, it just means that there are borderline circumstances in which relativity isn't a complete description. (And we knew that anyway; relativity can't currently be reconciled with quantum theory at the sub-atomic scale.)
The computer you're reading this on, your sat-nav, your DVD player, and all sorts of other things, all rely on relativity being "true" in all other circumstances.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- million voices
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: 10 May 2006, 22:31
- Location: The Ballrooms Of Mars
I don't really understand
Are they now saying that relativity is only relatively true
or is it
These neutrino johnnies haven't yet been drugs tested
Are they now saying that relativity is only relatively true
or is it
These neutrino johnnies haven't yet been drugs tested
Well you must know something
'Cos we're dying of admiration here
Mastering obscure alternatives
'Cos we're dying of admiration here
Mastering obscure alternatives
They said that it was tested 1500 times. Special deliveries from Switzerland to Italy.
- Nikolas Vitus Lagartija
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 23:35
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
Judging by your current avatar I suspect that you know more about this than you're letting on, Timtimsinister wrote:There could be a wealth of alternative explanations - extradimensional transference, or maybe a new form of energy field we haven't yet encountered...
The possibilities are endless! We live in exciting times.