Amanda Knox

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
Post Reply

Yay or nay?

Guilty
5
50%
Not guilty
3
30%
Undecided
2
20%
 
Total votes: 10
User avatar
Purple Light
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1526
Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 16:25
Location: Kirkstall
Contact:

Quite shocked that there's not (that I'm aware of) a thread about this.

Having followed the case closely (yes, because I fancy her) I reckon there's still a tiny bit of doubt to her innocence. The second trial was at least fairer than the joke of a first however. If she is completely innocent then the Italian police, and specifically Giuliano Mignini have got a lot to answer for. IF.

Thoughts?
“I got lost in the mirror, wondering what could have been, I couldn’t help but kill her, but I couldn’t kill the dream.”
Bartek
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6142
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 10:47

No data, no infos, except media flash (or even longer articles) but that's not reliable sources of facts, so no thoughts here. Even if she's not that innocent Italian Polizia and prosecutors really f**ked up this case at, and even from, the beginning- they didn't secure the evidence properly.
User avatar
DocSommer
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1828
Joined: 17 Apr 2006, 11:53
Location: Hamburg

Guilty ()
Not guilty ()
Undecided ()
Don't care (x)
User avatar
Purple Light
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1526
Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 16:25
Location: Kirkstall
Contact:

DocSommer wrote:Guilty ()
Not guilty ()
Undecided ()
Don't care (x)
Fair enough. :roll:
“I got lost in the mirror, wondering what could have been, I couldn’t help but kill her, but I couldn’t kill the dream.”
GC
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1266
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 22:05

Embarrisingly interesting story to follow.
I would do her though....
User avatar
Purple Light
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1526
Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 16:25
Location: Kirkstall
Contact:

Gollum's Cock wrote:Embarrisingly interesting story to follow.
I would do her though....
:notworthy:
“I got lost in the mirror, wondering what could have been, I couldn’t help but kill her, but I couldn’t kill the dream.”
User avatar
Dan
Overbomber
Posts: 2014
Joined: 25 Sep 2002, 01:00
Location: Leeds

Didn't follow the story closely enough to be able to judge (x)
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15278
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

Dan wrote:Didn't follow the story closely enough to be able to judge (x)
same here ... :wink: ...
DeWinter
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 920
Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 20:57

Reminds me of the Barrymore Pool Party. I've always been sure he knew what happened but kept quiet out of self-preservation. This sounds similar to me.
"Vengeance. Justice. Fire and blood.."
taylor
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1206
Joined: 09 Apr 2003, 20:53
Location: over the rainbow

guilty ! :evil:
death row for both
User avatar
the-happening
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 596
Joined: 13 Sep 2003, 20:21
Location: Farnborough, Hampshire

Being645 wrote:
Dan wrote:Didn't follow the story closely enough to be able to judge (x)
same here ... :wink: ...
Same here, although I think her conviction for perjury was upheld, so her time spent inside was for that offence.
"i'm talking about god, devil, hell, do you understand, finally?"
User avatar
Sita
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 894
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 15:45

Purple Light wrote:Quite shocked that there's not (that I'm aware of) a thread about this.

Having followed the case closely (yes, because I fancy her) I reckon there's still a tiny bit of doubt to her innocence. The second trial was at least fairer than the joke of a first however. If she is completely innocent then the Italian police, and specifically Giuliano Mignini have got a lot to answer for. IF.

Thoughts?
I guess it shows how the press manipulates you - the way I understood it was that there was a tiny bit of doubt to her guilt, so in dubio pro reo, they had to let her go.
We were obviously reading two different newspapers ;)
Anyway, I will never understand how people in such situations can hire PR agents, write memoirs and present irrelevant "humane" details of their petty lives to the press :urff:
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

DeWinter wrote:Reminds me of the Barrymore Pool Party. I've always been sure he knew what happened but kept quiet out of self-preservation. This sounds similar to me.
Agreed.

*edit to add: it's all very well Knox and her family going on about how they've been put through hell, or whatever it is they said, but FFS Meredith Kercher is dead. And if Amanda Knox didn't kill her, she sure as hell knows a lot more than she's saying.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
DeWinter
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 920
Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 20:57

markfiend wrote: Agreed.

*edit to add: it's all very well Knox and her family going on about how they've been put through hell, or whatever it is they said, but FFS Meredith Kercher is dead. And if Amanda Knox didn't kill her, she sure as hell knows a lot more than she's saying.
Well, didn't Knox admit to perjury anyway? By trying to implicate her boss in the murder? So she's not the most easy person to sympathise with or believe. If we're indulging in pure speculation, if she wasn't involved in the killing, she did something she's clearly unwilling to admit to. I suspect she came across her dead or dying and stole from her. By all accounts there were money rows between them.
In the Barrymore case reading between the lines it was a drugged-up sex party where things got too extreme for the guy who died and when he tried to get away he either fell or was shoved into the pool and drowned. The sight of Barrymore's "poor me" face for years after drove me round the twist with irritation.
"Vengeance. Justice. Fire and blood.."
Bartek
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6142
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 10:47

About in dubio pro reo- it's prosecutors job to prove, without any- even bit bit of shade- of doubt, that person that we- people, represented by prosecutor- are going to put in jail is guilty. And I'm sorry to hear that some of HLers proudly wearing Human Right Watch togas are for throwing people in jail just because 'it's clear'. If it's clear then why it wasn't proved on level of facts and not on level of emotions?
GC
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1266
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 22:05

Bartek wrote:About in dubio pro reo- it's prosecutors job to prove, without any- even bit bit of shade- of doubt, that person that we- people, represented by prosecutor- are going to put in jail is guilty. And I'm sorry to hear that some of HLers proudly wearing Human Right Watch togas are for throwing people in jail just because 'it's clear'. If it's clear then why it wasn't proved on level of facts and not on level of emotions?
You've fallen in love with her have n't you... :wink: :wink:
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Bartek wrote:About in dubio pro reo- it's prosecutors job to prove, without any- even bit bit of shade- of doubt, that person that we- people, represented by prosecutor- are going to put in jail is guilty. And I'm sorry to hear that some of HLers proudly wearing Human Right Watch togas are for throwing people in jail just because 'it's clear'. If it's clear then why it wasn't proved on level of facts and not on level of emotions?
This is very true. I'm sure she did something but I'm glad I wasn't on the jury.

All in all, I think an acquittal is probably the correct verdict.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
Post Reply