The Sisters of Mercy Forum
Uch, indeed ...Bartek wrote:This is another video where i see static music made by this band live, but that can be thrown on recordings, that sometimes kills real sound.
Edith: yes, it's 2006 sisterstekland video.
...
...
Ozpat wrote: Crap shirt but I'll buy it anyway.
lachert wrote: i started to watch Being645 link with full show, and realized that it's from 2006 when they start to play "still"
... hope you liked it nonetheless ... Still seems still valid, anyway ... bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
:lol::lol: ... don't your avatar look strikingly similar to the one from last year? :lol::lol: ...
great vocals.Really nice except the low guitars but this video says it all.
I did not shoot this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc3yHtJIjrI, the taper have sold it on ebay, then I got it via trade or sharing section.Bartek wrote:This is another video where i see static music made by this band live, but that can be thrown on recordings, that sometimes kills real sound.
Edith: yes, it's 2006 sisterstekland video.
Answer to your question: No I do not!bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
Ozpat wrote:Answer to your question: No I do not!bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
I would get more tired by posts like yours if I would care.
But I don't.....
I wasn't here at this time last year, sorry.Being645 wrote:bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
...
Don't you get tired of the same avatar? I do wonder how much longer you can keep going with the same old? ...
That would seem, according to the comments, to be the point though? I'm a big fan of TSOM, but personally wouldn't want to see the same thing year in, year out. I appreciate I'm in a minority there.lex3000 wrote:I've uploaded my photos from Belgrade Calling, but I'll be honest and say they look like most of the gigs we've been to when we've gone to see the Sisters.
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set ... 405&type=1
Same as always....... Oh, yes I get very very tired of the same setlist. Sorry to say that according to a few they do change the setlist a lot. They played exactly the same songs in Gothenburg last year, as well on other shows. Ok, they did not play Something Fast in Gothenburg, but of course they did other night last year.bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
Bartek wrote:You're such as hatstand. Why can't you fun with what you got. this setlist is so much changed compare to 1981 or 1985 or 1993 od 2001, so why you still complain?! and sound is much better.
... Imagine Samuel Beckett woulda had to put up with this kind of stuff if the Information Superhighway was out thenplayboy wrote:Same as always....... Oh, yes I get very very tired of the same setlist. Sorry to say that according to a few they do change the setlist a lot. They played exactly the same songs in Gothenburg last year, as well on other shows. Ok, they did not play Something Fast in Gothenburg, but of course they did other night last year.bearskin wrote:Setlist seems strikingly similar to the show from Auckland last year? Don't you lot get tired of the same setlists? I do wonder how much longer the girls can keep going with the same old?
I was hoping for a change for once. Now I know it will never come.
And I am not surprised that the sound was muted and pretty low even at the front. Somehow I knew about this and about the setlist before the show....
Yes, the setlist has changed since 2001.Bartek wrote:You're such as hatstand. Why can't you fun with what you got. this setlist is so much changed compare to 1981 or 1985 or 1993 od 2001, so why you still complain?! and sound is much better.
oh lord, what an asshole.mickydazzler wrote:I think this was the highlight of the two days we were there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zj-RS6O ... ata_player
Of course I should have seen the sarcasm.... I blacked out or something... But it is not always easy to tell as it sometimes seems that everyones seems to happy the way things are and is honestly thinking that they DO change the setlist and so on....Bartek wrote:@playboy: That was very cheap sarcasm form my side, you could recognised that from years that i've pointed - 11 years ago? 31 yrs ago? 19 yrs ago? Come on.
I'm with those hatsands who wants to see change, develope, progress of TSOM not standing still ("if it makes you happy") or wearing new shirt. Latest example of fight between good and evil (i'm not pointing who's who) is here (and we agree to diagree, like we would change anything).
"good and evil" ... how saddening can this become? My condolences to your intellectul capacities, if that's what you really make of it ...Bartek wrote:Latest example of fight between good and evil (i'm not pointing who's who) is here (and we agree to diagree, like we would change anything).
