Any Europe summer festival dates in 2013 ?

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
Post Reply
Bartek
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6141
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 10:47

Image
(sorry for pix/mem, i just couldn't help myself to not posting this, of course i could just not post but.)
Top
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15274
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

lsind wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
Nope. After 13-15 and 9-11, the next pair of numbers should be 5-7 (the progression between pairs is descending, not random).
So the next album is due for... 2014!!! (1+4=5) (Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us. Which would explain why they didn't tour in 2004: they were recording the album! :lol:)
And then there will another one in 2016!!! (1+6=7)

Yeah right...
That's surely it, Isind! How in hell did you manage ... ;D ;D ;D :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: ... :lol: ...
Top
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

Go home Heartland, you're drunk.
Top
User avatar
LyanvisAberrant
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 757
Joined: 18 Mar 2013, 21:58
Location: Where the wild roses grow.
Contact:
Contact LyanvisAberrant

lsind wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
(Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us.)
Now Why would they do that?
(It's not like we're the only ones that would buy it... :wink: :innocent: )
A man with a fictitious grin pondered the terrain in which he flooded with anguish, for this is England. The lion cannot be tamed, this is the game.
Top
User avatar
stufarq
Popweazle Piddlepoop
Posts: 3209
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 17:09
Location: my own imagination

Steven Eloot wrote:
million voices wrote:don't think there will be any Sisters gigs this year.
Number nine is a significant number for The Sisters :
- Nine while nine
- "Nine, nine, nine, singer down" (Under the Gun)
- And no gigs each nine years : 1986-1995-2004-2013-2022

Is there a calculation for the next album release date - or does that come uner "insufficient data"
Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :

F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...
Any more of that and we'll be round your front door with the quick-setting whitewash and the shaved monkey.
Top
Steven Eloot
Road Kill
Posts: 39
Joined: 28 Nov 2011, 20:39
Location: Aalst - Belgium

lsind wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
Nope. After 13-15 and 9-11, the next pair of numbers should be 5-7 (the progression between pairs is descending, not random).
So the next album is due for... 2014!!! (1+4=5) (Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us. Which would explain why they didn't tour in 2004: they were recording the album! :lol:)
And then there will another one in 2016!!! (1+6=7)

Yeah right...
Yeah, well done ! I'm always in for a more optimistic theory than mine :wink:
Top
Steven Eloot
Road Kill
Posts: 39
Joined: 28 Nov 2011, 20:39
Location: Aalst - Belgium

stufarq wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote:
million voices wrote:don't think there will be any Sisters gigs this year.
Number nine is a significant number for The Sisters :
- Nine while nine
- "Nine, nine, nine, singer down" (Under the Gun)
- And no gigs each nine years : 1986-1995-2004-2013-2022

Is there a calculation for the next album release date - or does that come uner "insufficient data"
Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :

F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...
Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...
Top
User avatar
Back in time
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 552
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:11
Location: Zagreb

Steven Eloot wrote:
stufarq wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote: Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :

F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13t
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11

So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...
Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...
Why is 2098 not possible ? :innocent:
Lord, what can the harvest hope for, if not for the care of the reaper man.
Top
User avatar
Syberberg
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 959
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 05:46
Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire.

Back in time wrote:
Steven Eloot wrote:
stufarq wrote: No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...
Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...
Why is 2098 not possible ? :innocent:
Because we're not quite sure when the timer on the real Andrew Eldritch's cryo-unit is set for.
I don't necessarily agree with everything I think.
Top
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17629
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:
Contact Pista

:lol:
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days
TheCureCommunity
Top
Bartek
Underneath the Rock
Posts: 6141
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 10:47

album in 2098 or 2089 would be, to put in :von: words: "so cold (so out of control)".
Top
User avatar
iesus
Overbomber
Posts: 4455
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 11:15
Location: x-EU

Advanced Number Therories, yammiiii :lol:

I would like to mention that the sequence must not change and remain in pace to find out the correct date and take in calc all number of the 4digit year not just the last two :wink:
'Are we the Baddies?'...
"Someday! Someday, everything you need, is just gonna fall out of the sky..." -A.E. Reading 1991
"Don't forget that most of the judges in witches trials had harvard degrees."
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Sisters Chat”