Body And Soul 7"/12" listening analysis and graphs

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
Post Reply
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

The idea has been floated in the past that the original 7" and 12" Body And Soul singles utilise alternate mixes for Body And Soul and Train. This idea is further considered if one happens to compare the rendering of Body And Soul on Overbombing with the 12" - the sound is quite different.

I compared my original singles with the 2015 remaster to see if I could pinpoint the differences. I did this by needledropping the singles and comparing everything digitally, this way I could ensure volume was the same across the board and so I was only hearing EQ and source discrepancies rather than volume. On both tracks, the 12" is significantly brighter and as a result more dynamic, whilst the 7" sounds murkier/cloudier. The 7" mastering is clearly more compressed, especially on the kick drum. Upon listening and comparing, I couldn't detect any mix differences between the 7" and 12" renditions, and I think the audible differences that are definitely there are a result of quite disparate mastering techniques utilised in the lacquer cutting process. The 7" mastering is certainly more compressed and muddy sounding but, when we compare this back to back with the 2015 remaster (which I currently consider to be canon) it is the 7" mastering that sounds closer to canon than the 12" which, by comparison, sounds goosed in the upper registers. On the 12", the upper mid-range is excessively boosted, which has the effect of bringing out the guitars and vocals, making the mix "pop". However, the more one compares this with the 2015 canon the more one's ear becomes fatigued by it. This isn't to say the 12" is bad, but it is certainly the odd one out and, given what we know about the gain issues on the 12", further confirms its status as "problematic".

BODY AND SOUL frequency analysis:
RED = 12"
YELLOW = 7"
BLUE = 2015
Image
Here it is possible to see the EQ differences between the three versions. As you can see, the 7" and 2015 curves are closer overall, whilst the 12" drifts upwards between 7-12 kHz, providing the upper mid-range boost which adds a sense of definition or "air".

TRAIN frequency analysis:
RED = 12"
YELLOW = 7"
BLUE = 2015
Image
Here the difference is much more pronounced. Again, the 7" and 2015 follow a similar overall curve, whilst the 12" is significantly boosted from 8-14 kHz (a difference of almost 10 dB at 12 kHz!).

Humans are most sensitive to frequencies between 2-5 kHz. If we focus on this range, the 12" and 2015 are almost identical, with the 7" revealing less definition (which results in its murky quality). It is beyond this range, however, where things start to go awry on the 12".

I certainly think the 12" mastering is unique then. It's truer to the songs in our crucial auditory range, but it's let down by a frankly wild upper mid-range boost, and we know this leads to issues down the road with Body Electric and Afterhours.

You can hear for yourself: 7" / 12".

Thank you!

Addendum: One possible reason for the inaccurate high frequencies on the 12" could be a Dolby NR mismatch. If you record with Dolby and playback without, the result is that high frequencies will be over-emphasised.
User avatar
paul
Overbomber
Posts: 3219
Joined: 02 Apr 2002, 01:00

Pfffff..... ;-)
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15272
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

Thank you for these researches ... :notworthy: ...
The differences between the 7" and 12" are clearly audible ... and once one starts comparing, both versions sound really not optimal ...

You got a link to the 2015 remaster, too? That should be interesting. ... :?: :) ...
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17628
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

Just to compound matters, would the quality of the actual vinyl also contribute to the difference?
If, for example, it was p!ss poor reground vinyl used for the 7", I am assuming the end product would be inferior from an audio point of view.
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
eastmidswhizzkid
Faster Than The Light Of Speed
Posts: 9876
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 00:01
Location: WhizzWorld
Contact:

Being645 wrote:Thank you for these researches ... :notworthy: ...
The differences between the 7" and 12" are clearly audible ... and once one starts comparing, both versions sound really not optimal ...

You got a link to the 2015 remaster, too? That should be interesting. ... :?: :) ...
i'd love a link to the 2015 remaster.....to be deleted immediately after listening (research and destroy lol), honest.

EDIT: obviously i could never deliberately destroy anything by the sisters but as soon as i start flogging my fan-videos (mashup mixes from Life Of Brian/Walk Away with textual irrelevancies from Haynes Manual for the Vauxhall Viva) i bet i'll buy one immediately. :kiss: :von:
Well I was handsome and I was strong
And I knew the words to every song.
"Did my singing please you?"
"No! The words you sang were wrong!"

:bat:
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4966
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

Proof you can make a sows ear from a silk purse

1984 live version is all that matters
Goths have feelings too
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

Pista wrote:Just to compound matters, would the quality of the actual vinyl also contribute to the difference?
If, for example, it was p!ss poor reground vinyl used for the 7", I am assuming the end product would be inferior from an audio point of view.
Yes, but that would probably manifest itself in the form of surface noise and crackle.
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:
Being645 wrote:Thank you for these researches ... :notworthy: ...
The differences between the 7" and 12" are clearly audible ... and once one starts comparing, both versions sound really not optimal ...

You got a link to the 2015 remaster, too? That should be interesting. ... :?: :) ...
i'd love a link to the 2015 remaster.....to be deleted immediately after listening (research and destroy lol), honest.

EDIT: obviously i could never deliberately destroy anything by the sisters but as soon as i start flogging my fan-videos (mashup mixes from Life Of Brian/Walk Away with textual irrelevancies from Haynes Manual for the Vauxhall Viva) i bet i'll buy one immediately. :kiss: :von:
The 2015 remasters are available to stream on Tidal and Spotify.
User avatar
eastmidswhizzkid
Faster Than The Light Of Speed
Posts: 9876
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 00:01
Location: WhizzWorld
Contact:

thanks to a kind benefactor (cheers steve) i already have them. ;D but thanks anyway bro.

BIG EDIT: just burnt these to CD and WOWWA-WEEWEE-WOOWOO! theyre f**king amazing. EVERYONE here needs to [s]hear[/s] own these. :von:
Well I was handsome and I was strong
And I knew the words to every song.
"Did my singing please you?"
"No! The words you sang were wrong!"

:bat:
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

Availability by location: http://www.findhdmusic.com/album/first- ... s-of/23828

N.B. Whilst the streaming editions contain the tracks discussed here, they appear to have incorrect mixes for the main album. Not sure what's going on there.
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15272
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

robertzombie wrote:Availability by location: http://www.findhdmusic.com/album/first- ... s-of/23828

N.B. Whilst the streaming editions contain the tracks discussed here, they appear to have incorrect mixes for the main album. Not sure what's going on there.
Cool .... thanks for the link ... :notworthy: ...
here's the one to the 2015 Body And Soul 12" - available for a listen in 320 kbps MP3 or 16 Bit FLAC
http://www.qobuz.com/de-de/album/body-a ... 5646140435

So these are the downloads included in the vinyl edition, and not the data file only version?
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

Being645 wrote:
robertzombie wrote:Availability by location: http://www.findhdmusic.com/album/first- ... s-of/23828

N.B. Whilst the streaming editions contain the tracks discussed here, they appear to have incorrect mixes for the main album. Not sure what's going on there.
Cool .... thanks for the link ... :notworthy: ...
here's the one to the 2015 Body And Soul 12" - available for a listen in 320 kbps MP3 or 16 Bit FLAC
http://www.qobuz.com/de-de/album/body-a ... 5646140435

So these are the downloads included in the vinyl edition, and not the data file only version?
The downloads included with the records are limited to mp3 quality. The ones you've linked to are the same masters but full resolution.
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15272
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

robertzombie wrote:
Being645 wrote:
robertzombie wrote:Availability by location: http://www.findhdmusic.com/album/first- ... s-of/23828

N.B. Whilst the streaming editions contain the tracks discussed here, they appear to have incorrect mixes for the main album. Not sure what's going on there.
Cool .... thanks for the link ... :notworthy: ...
here's the one to the 2015 Body And Soul 12" - available for a listen in 320 kbps MP3 or 16 Bit FLAC
http://www.qobuz.com/de-de/album/body-a ... 5646140435

So these are the downloads included in the vinyl edition, and not the data file only version?
The downloads included with the records are limited to mp3 quality. The ones you've linked to are the same masters but full resolution.
Thank you for clarifying that ... :D ... I should have known given the discussions here on the FALAA 2015 release ... anyway, it's always better to reassure certain facts ... ;D ...
User avatar
stufarq
Popweazle Piddlepoop
Posts: 3209
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 17:09
Location: my own imagination

2015 remasters? Are these official?
Any more of that and we'll be round your front door with the quick-setting whitewash and the shaved monkey.
User avatar
Pista
Cureboi
Posts: 17628
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 15:03
Location: Lost In A Forest
Contact:

stufarq wrote:2015 remasters? Are these official?
Yeppers.
& they are lovely :D
Cheers.
Steve
Just like the old days

TheCureCommunity
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

User avatar
stufarq
Popweazle Piddlepoop
Posts: 3209
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 17:09
Location: my own imagination

Oh, are these the vinyl ones? I'd forgotten about them.
Any more of that and we'll be round your front door with the quick-setting whitewash and the shaved monkey.
User avatar
robertzombie
Overbomber
Posts: 4382
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
Location: London

stufarq wrote:Oh, are these the vinyl ones? I'd forgotten about them.
Vinyl and high-resolution download :) Both are great.
Post Reply