Why start now?mh wrote: and Von just didn't know the words.
I'd still like one last album. Even if it's just all the "new" old songs recorded nicely.
Why start now?mh wrote: and Von just didn't know the words.
Same for me... plus Good Things and Jolenesultan2075 wrote:Why start now?mh wrote: and Von just didn't know the words.
I'd still like one last album. Even if it's just all the "new" old songs recorded nicely.
I think the smoke reduction is to more show off the fancy mirrors and new light show, but you're probably right. A one and a half hour set instead of two, sticking to the low notes and no whale noises in Flood will help too.ruffers wrote:I see where you're coming from, and would have maybe agreed if there hadn't been the changes in the show.
The reduction in growly snarls will surely contribute to the voice lasting longer, maybe even the amount of smoke has been cut down as it can't do your throat any good every night.
For more the rearrangement is potentially a recognition that ineed it couldn't go on like that - and as such actually suggests they'll be going on for a while yet.
Fingers crossed.
I've seen a few of those videos and you are correct. They are pretty poor. They are no recollection of the sound in the venue at all though. Why would they be? Please try not to judge a live band on poorly recorded phone footage on you tube.Izzy HaveMercy wrote:I see a lot of good words from the fans, and a lot of bad reviews from the press.
I've seen the latest videos from this tour, Roundhouse, AB etc... and, well, it's bad, very bad.
.
Of course not, I know YouTube videos are not representative and I will rarely judge a band on those shaky 240p recordings.ribbons69 wrote:I've seen a few of those videos and you are correct. They are pretty poor. They are no recollection of the sound in the venue at all though. Why would they be? Please try not to judge a live band on poorly recorded phone footage on you tube.Izzy HaveMercy wrote:I see a lot of good words from the fans, and a lot of bad reviews from the press.
I've seen the latest videos from this tour, Roundhouse, AB etc... and, well, it's bad, very bad.
.
I try to stay out of these topics, but...panzerfaust wrote:just seen a few more videos.
the key difference is that most of the singing is done by them hired goons.
even if it was mumble/growling it was still eldritch with some charisma.
them hired sidekicks got none in their voice.
panzerfaust wrote:just seen a few more videos.
the key difference is that most of the singing is done by them hired goons.
even if it was mumble/growling it was still eldritch with some charisma.
them hired sidekicks got none in their voice.
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:panzerfaust wrote:just seen a few more videos.
the key difference is that most of the singing is done by them hired goons.
even if it was mumble/growling it was still eldritch with some charisma.
them hired sidekicks got none in their voice.
Fookin' aye. They're bloody good musicians, and genuinely nice geezers too.lazarus corporation wrote: It's fine if you don't like the Sisters' live gigs anymore, but Chris & Ben are both damn fine guitarists, have both given over 10 years to the band, and have clearly had an influence on the band's sound. They're not session musicians.
agreed.Bartek wrote: As for names for Chris and Ben, that's not nice, even if they are hired hands, but it's true that their voices have no charisma at all. On one video on YT, which someone was taking from Chris side, i heard some iritating singing, i took me 30 sec. to realise that it wasn't someone from audience but Chris itself. Sorry to write that, because Chris seems to be top block, and he's doing great job for TSOM, but that's how it is.