Hussain - should he stay or should he go?
mmmm...
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Stay. It's a bit of a turn-up when England have too many good batsmen!
Another reason why cricket isn't goth: you can't play when it's dark.
Another reason why cricket isn't goth: you can't play when it's dark.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- hallucienate
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4602
- Joined: 17 Apr 2002, 01:00
- Location: /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
- Contact:
erm: day/night cricket is very popular here.markfiend wrote:Stay. It's a bit of a turn-up when England have too many good batsmen!
Another reason why cricket isn't goth: you can't play when it's dark.
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
tough call. quite apart from hitting a ton to win the match he was also england's best fielder on sunday so there's no real worries over his age. on the other hand, it's going to be nigh on impossible to drop strauss after he hit almost 200 on debut which leaves the selectors with a (rather nice) dilemma.Karst wrote:Hussain - should he stay or should he go?
i've a feeling nasser might call it a day though. he's obviously aware that he might be standing in the way of england building for the future and i can't think of a better way of calling time on your test career than a match-winning century at lords...
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Wise-guy. But they use floodlights. So it's not dark. Ever heard of "bad light stopped play"?hallucienate wrote:erm: day/night cricket is very popular here.markfiend wrote:Stay. It's a bit of a turn-up when England have too many good batsmen!
Another reason why cricket isn't goth: you can't play when it's dark.
IMO he stepped down from the captaincy too early, so he'll probably do the same from the test side. The idea of going out on a high might appeal to him too.RicheyJames wrote:i've a feeling nasser might call it a day though. he's obviously aware that he might be standing in the way of england building for the future and i can't think of a better way of calling time on your test career than a match-winning century at lords...
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- hallucienate
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4602
- Joined: 17 Apr 2002, 01:00
- Location: /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
- Contact:
I think they should replace floodlights with strobelights, it'd make the game far more interesting.markfiend wrote:Wise-guy. But they use floodlights. So it's not dark. Ever heard of "bad light stopped play"?hallucienate wrote:erm: day/night cricket is very popular here.markfiend wrote:Stay. It's a bit of a turn-up when England have too many good batsmen!
Another reason why cricket isn't goth: you can't play when it's dark.
A smoke machine would also be cool...
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Then you could call cricket goth
Just the thought of strobe-lit cricket is making my head hurt.
Just the thought of strobe-lit cricket is making my head hurt.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- emilystrange
- Above the Chemist
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: 03 Nov 2003, 20:26
- Location: Lady Strange's boudoir.
ouch. mine too.
i want to go to a 20 over match this summer if i can
i want to go to a 20 over match this summer if i can
I don't wanna live like I don't mind
- Quiff Boy
- Herr Administrator
- Posts: 16793
- Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Lurking and fixing
- Contact:
cricket 101:
1. There are two teams. One out, one in.
2. The team that's out try to get the player that's in, out.
3. When they do get him out, he goes in.
4. Then the next player goes out. As long as he's out, he's in.
5. The object is then for the team that's out to get the second player out. When they get him out, he goes in.
6. This process is repeated for each innings until the team that's out gets the team that's in all out.
7. When the whole team is out, the team that was in goes out, and the team that was out goes in.
8. Then they play a second innings until they're all out. Except one player. He remains not out.
stupid game
1. There are two teams. One out, one in.
2. The team that's out try to get the player that's in, out.
3. When they do get him out, he goes in.
4. Then the next player goes out. As long as he's out, he's in.
5. The object is then for the team that's out to get the second player out. When they get him out, he goes in.
6. This process is repeated for each innings until the team that's out gets the team that's in all out.
7. When the whole team is out, the team that was in goes out, and the team that was out goes in.
8. Then they play a second innings until they're all out. Except one player. He remains not out.
stupid game
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
- Gary
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 519
- Joined: 28 Mar 2002, 00:00
- Location: Manchester
Quiff Boy wrote:cricket 101:
1. There are two teams. One out, one in.
2. The team that's out try to get the player that's in, out.
3. When they do get him out, he goes in.
4. Then the next player goes out. As long as he's out, he's in.
5. The object is then for the team that's out to get the second player out. When they get him out, he goes in.
6. This process is repeated for each innings until the team that's out gets the team that's in all out.
7. When the whole team is out, the team that was in goes out, and the team that was out goes in.
8. Then they play a second innings until they're all out. Except one player. He remains not out.
stupid game
So thats why i never got it at highschool.. well that and i had other things on my mind (a)
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
oh emily, that's simply not cricket (see what i did there ). don't get me wrong, the twenty over slog-fest is good fun and it has its place but to bring it up during a serious discussion about test cricket is just plain wrong.emilystrange wrote:i want to go to a 20 over match this summer if i can
and quiffy; it's no stupider than twenty-two men chasing an inflated pig's bladder around a field but it is equally capable of producing moments of sublime skill that lift us above our everyday humdrum existence.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- emilystrange
- Above the Chemist
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: 03 Nov 2003, 20:26
- Location: Lady Strange's boudoir.
i'm not going to bother explain myself to you about why i want to go. i'm terribly sorry to interrupt your so-serious discussion about test cricket.
i'll be in the bar with quiffy, watching something else and hopefully being allowed to join the conversation.
i'll be in the bar with quiffy, watching something else and hopefully being allowed to join the conversation.
I don't wanna live like I don't mind
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
well forgive me for daring to having a contrary opinion. i'm afraid that i momentarily forgot that heartland had mutated into a mutual back-slapping club and support group for die-hard fans of a long-deceased rock band.
see you in the next life.
see you in the next life.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- emilystrange
- Above the Chemist
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: 03 Nov 2003, 20:26
- Location: Lady Strange's boudoir.
How can you possibly have a contrary opinion to the bare fact that I want to go? I offered no reasons for my wish.
I don't wanna live like I don't mind
- Thrash Harry
- Utterly Bastard Filthy
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: 13 May 2003, 20:56
- Location: Over The Hill And Far Away
- Contact:
Just be grateful you never had to suffer Stonewall Boycott in the 70s.Quiff Boy wrote:either way, its a p*ss tedious game
Go to sleep now, Francis.
- Thrash Harry
- Utterly Bastard Filthy
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: 13 May 2003, 20:56
- Location: Over The Hill And Far Away
- Contact:
Aye. Bring back the grammar police. Never did me any harm.RicheyJames wrote:i'm afraid that i momentarily forgot that heartland had mutated into a mutual back-slapping club and support group for die-hard fans of a long-deceased rock band.
Go to sleep now, Francis.
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
it was never really my intention to debate this but what the heck...emilystrange wrote:How can you possibly have a contrary opinion to the bare fact that I want to go? I offered no reasons for my wish.
you expressed a desire to watch a twenty20 match. now unless you're some sort of masochist (which can't be entirely ruled out) or just want to pay money to watch a bunch of blokes run around in their pyjamas (again, i'm keeping an open mind) you must see some merit in this particular form of the sport. whilst i readily accept that twenty20 does have some merits (ie it's a bit of a laugh, at times exciting and might help catch the interest of the next generation of potential cricketers (not to mention giving the counties a healthy financial boost)) i (along with many others) consider it to be akin to the b@stard child in the cricketing family. since we'd spent most of this thread revelling in our enjoyment of a thrilling test match (far and away the "purest" form of the game) i thought it only right to point this out.
so there you have it: i'm a cricket fascist and i'm not ashamed to admit it. you're more than welcome to enjoy the twenty-over slog-a-thon but i reserve the right to crticise, moan and complain when it's mentioned alongside the glories of a hard-fought five-day test between two evenly-matched sides.
oh, and do try to stop whining everytime i disagree with you. it's becoming most tiresome.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Let's put that to the test. What is your opinion on the "new" no-ball rule concerning where a bowler's feet land?RicheyJames wrote:i'm a cricket fascist and i'm not ashamed to admit it.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- Thrash Harry
- Utterly Bastard Filthy
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: 13 May 2003, 20:56
- Location: Over The Hill And Far Away
- Contact:
Snobbery in cricket? Well I never.
Go to sleep now, Francis.
- Chairman Bux
- shut.the.fuck.up
- Posts: 931
- Joined: 23 May 2002, 01:00
- Location: Buxville-on-Sea
- Contact:
Pardon me, but as far as I’m aware I am the only one here allowed to be an obnoxious bastard.RicheyJames wrote:oh, and do try to stop whining everytime i disagree with you. it's becoming most tiresome.
Thank you.
Minister of Misinformation and Misdirection.
We first met through a shared view
She loved me and I did too
We first met through a shared view
She loved me and I did too
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
eh? as far as i can recall neither the 2000 nor the 2003 revision of the laws made any change to the no-ball rule relating to the placement of the bowler's feet. it's always been back foot in front of the return crease and front foot behind the popping crease hasn't it?markfiend wrote:What is your opinion on the "new" no-ball rule concerning where a bowler's feet land?
unless you're thinking about encroaching onto the pitch during the follow-through but that's not a no-ball - it's two warnings followed by immediate removal from the attack.
care to enlighten me further mr fiend?
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
oooh, get her! i didn't know i needed an obnoxious bastard licenceChairman Bux wrote:Pardon me, but as far as I’m aware I am the only one here allowed to be an obnoxious bastard.
Thank you.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- Chairman Bux
- shut.the.fuck.up
- Posts: 931
- Joined: 23 May 2002, 01:00
- Location: Buxville-on-Sea
- Contact:
Well now you know.RicheyJames wrote:oooh, get her! i didn't know i needed an obnoxious bastard licenceChairman Bux wrote:Pardon me, but as far as I’m aware I am the only one here allowed to be an obnoxious bastard.
Thank you.
Minister of Misinformation and Misdirection.
We first met through a shared view
She loved me and I did too
We first met through a shared view
She loved me and I did too
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
but i still don't care.Chairman Bux wrote:Well now you know.RicheyJames wrote:oooh, get her! i didn't know i needed an obnoxious bastard licenceChairman Bux wrote:Pardon me, but as far as I’m aware I am the only one here allowed to be an obnoxious bastard.
Thank you.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"