yeah that's what i meant seeing as that seemed to be the main thrust of the article. oh, and for what it's worth, i think it's a bloody ridiculous idea too!markfiend wrote:The rest (about having a free hit on the ball after a no-ball ) is to do with one dayers though.
mmmm...
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
...As is the short match slogathon. Which is where we came in.RicheyJames wrote:yeah that's what i meant seeing as that seemed to be the main thrust of the article. oh, and for what it's worth, i think it's a bloody ridiculous idea too!markfiend wrote:The rest (about having a free hit on the ball after a no-ball ) is to do with one dayers though.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
...except i maintian that the slogfest does have some merits. it's a bloody good laugh but it's not cricket.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- andymackem
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: 17 Dec 2003, 10:11
- Location: Darkest Durham
Limited overs cricket is nigh-on essential for people with jobs who want to watch a cricket match.
I can't take 4/5 days off to laze around in the sun and drink moderate quantities of booze - certainly not more than once a summer.
But I can spend a Sunday afternoon doing precisely that. Thus limited overs cricket works.
Still, I'd watch most forms of the game when possible. And most forms of most other games too. Except horsey things.
I can't take 4/5 days off to laze around in the sun and drink moderate quantities of booze - certainly not more than once a summer.
But I can spend a Sunday afternoon doing precisely that. Thus limited overs cricket works.
Still, I'd watch most forms of the game when possible. And most forms of most other games too. Except horsey things.
Names are just a souvenir ...
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
tosh and piffle sir! few,if any, of us can afford the time to watch every ball of a test but any true student of the game can appreciate both a sublime individual performance in the context of a match and the fact that all fifteen sessions of a truly great test (and i'm including that which has just graced lords) can be enjoyed in and of themselves.andymackem wrote:Limited overs cricket is nigh-on essential for people with jobs who want to watch a cricket match.
I can't take 4/5 days off to laze around in the sun and drink moderate quantities of booze - certainly not more than once a summer.
But I can spend a Sunday afternoon doing precisely that. Thus limited overs cricket works.
Still, I'd watch most forms of the game when possible. And most forms of most other games too. Except horsey things.
although i still maintain that the fifty, forty and even twenty over forms of the game have their place. but that place is somewhere below the true splendour of the full test.
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- Black Planet
- Andrew's Love Goddess
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: 02 Jun 2003, 20:16
Why do I think Empire Down is fitting at this moment?
- andymackem
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: 17 Dec 2003, 10:11
- Location: Darkest Durham
Aren't we basically agreeing with one another, but trying to make it look like an argument?RicheyJames wrote:tosh and piffle sir! few,if any, of us can afford the time to watch every ball of a test but any true student of the game can appreciate both a sublime individual performance in the context of a match and the fact that all fifteen sessions of a truly great test (and i'm including that which has just graced lords) can be enjoyed in and of themselves.andymackem wrote:Limited overs cricket is nigh-on essential for people with jobs who want to watch a cricket match.
I can't take 4/5 days off to laze around in the sun and drink moderate quantities of booze - certainly not more than once a summer.
But I can spend a Sunday afternoon doing precisely that. Thus limited overs cricket works.
Still, I'd watch most forms of the game when possible. And most forms of most other games too. Except horsey things.
although i still maintain that the fifty, forty and even twenty over forms of the game have their place. but that place is somewhere below the true splendour of the full test.
Names are just a souvenir ...
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G
- RicheyJames
- Bad Tempered Young Man
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 02 Jun 2002, 01:00
- Location: far beyond the pale
yes. but it's such fun isn't it?andymackem wrote:Aren't we basically agreeing with one another, but trying to make it look like an argument?
"contradictions are meaningless, there's nothing to betray"
- Mrs RicheyJames
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 00:33
- Location: Rick Astley's house. Trying to find out why he chooses to look like Timsinister.
Do you see what I've got to put up with?andymackem wrote: Aren't we basically agreeing with one another, but trying to make it look like an argument?
Impossible.........
Only a paand.
- andymackem
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: 17 Dec 2003, 10:11
- Location: Darkest Durham
No, I see what you choose to put up with.Sexygoth wrote:Do you see what I've got to put up with?andymackem wrote: Aren't we basically agreeing with one another, but trying to make it look like an argument?
Impossible.........
Insane ........
Names are just a souvenir ...
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G
Russian footie in the run-up to the World Cup - my latest E-book available from https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DGJFF6G