Scanning 12" record covers?

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
Post Reply
Spiggy's hat
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 662
Joined: 31 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: East Yorkshire

How do you do it?

My scanner (all scanners as far as I'm aware) aren't big enough to fit a 12" record cover on, so how do you scan them?
Give me one good reason
User avatar
Izzy HaveMercy
The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
Posts: 8844
Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Long Dark Forties
Contact:

Bend them in two and make a recto-verso copy. Don't bother taking the record out of the sleeve. :von:

For others than your Mish collection tho, you can just take a pic with a digicam or scan two halves and 'glue' them together with Photoshop or similar.

IZ.
.
.
For Greater Good - Ambient Music for the Masses...
.
.
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16795
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

i had to do this for loads of sleeves for the ghost dance & march violets websites…

best way i found was to remove the record from the sleeve and then scan each “corner� of the sleeve separately & re-assemble them in photoshop.

takes a bit of faffing ;)

if you put a large black (or dark) cloth over the record sleeve, underneath the scanner lid you can prevent a lot of the light from getting under the scanner lid.

also, on my scanner software it gives you the option to force certain rgb, brightness and contrast settings – i found it was better to do this than let it auto choose… otherwise it can give you different looking scans for each corner of the sleeve!! find a good combination of values for these settings and then use them for all the scans.

luckily, with the ghost dance artwork, a lot of the sleeves had solid blocks of colour, which you could just do a flood-fill on to make a much nicer and smoother looking scan. eg: http://www.ghostdance.co.uk/discography ... 12back.jpg

a couple of times i also found that i needed to slightly rotate a corner scan by 2 or 3 degrees to compensate for scanning innacuracies and subtle movements of the sleeve while on the scanner glass.
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Quiff Boy wrote:a couple of times i also found that i needed to slightly rotate a corner scan by 2 or 3 degrees to compensate for scanning innacuracies and subtle movements of the sleeve while on the scanner glass.
:urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: Nightmare!

One I did once didn't look right until I'd rotated it 0.3 of a degree!
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Quiff Boy
Herr Administrator
Posts: 16795
Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: Lurking and fixing
Contact:

markfiend wrote:
Quiff Boy wrote:a couple of times i also found that i needed to slightly rotate a corner scan by 2 or 3 degrees to compensate for scanning innacuracies and subtle movements of the sleeve while on the scanner glass.
:urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: Nightmare!

One I did once didn't look right until I'd rotated it 0.3 of a degree!
yep! i think its whats they call a "labour of love" :o :lol:
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
Spiggy's hat
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 662
Joined: 31 Jan 2002, 00:00
Location: East Yorkshire

Many thanks for the above, it clearly is as difficult as I expected.
Give me one good reason
User avatar
hallucienate
Overbomber
Posts: 4602
Joined: 17 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
Contact:

User avatar
Hojyuu-obi
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 634
Joined: 10 Feb 2004, 23:26
Location: 2000 Antwerp 4

I usually scan 2 halves + bottom or top depending on how you lay the sleeve onto the flatbed, then create a new image in a photo editor paste the halves etc.. together. Needless to say this is an annoying way to go about things as sometimes the scanned bits don't 'fit' onto each other as you expected (start over ...) :urff:

I'd say buy a digital camera ;D
Have you any dreams you'd like to sell?
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

markfiend wrote:One I did once didn't look right until I'd rotated it 0.3 of a degree!
The Devil is in the detail, luckily Photoshop will accommodate even a 0.1 degree rotation.
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Red Sunsets wrote:
markfiend wrote:One I did once didn't look right until I'd rotated it 0.3 of a degree!
The Devil is in the detail, luckily Photoshop will accommodate even a 0.1 degree rotation.
Indeedy. But it's the trial and error that's the nightmare. Every time it's wrong you have to undo and try a different figure; too many rotations degrades the image from excessive resampling.

It's not so bad with images for the web, but even Photoshop on a super-duper G5 takes time to rotate a 2548*3505 pixel image (the full bed of my scanner at 300 dpi)
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
Post Reply