Page 5 of 12

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 00:29
by wild bill buttock
Look we've got maximum points and not conceded a goal.And the krauts got to the final in 2002 playing like a bunch of spaccas.I'm still optomistic.
BTW if Steve Bruce happens to be reading HL tonight,Can we have Stern John back?I'm sure Coventry'll swap him for Heskey.

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 20:26
by robertzombie
:eek: Czech Rep. lost to Ghana! :urff:

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:08
by scotty
robertzombie wrote::eek: Czech Rep. lost to Ghana! :urff:
I know :lol: , crazy result, well done Ghana :notworthy: , I'm watching Italy v U.S.A, the Ref's sent off three players already, they're only 5 minutes into the second half :eek:

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:46
by canon docre
scotty wrote:
robertzombie wrote::eek: Czech Rep. lost to Ghana! :urff:
I know :lol: , crazy result, well done Ghana :notworthy: , I'm watching Italy v U.S.A, the Ref's sent off three players already, they're only 5 minutes into the second half :eek:
As both teams obviously cant play football, they settled for beating up each other. :lol:

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:50
by Zuma
football has to exist for some reason :?:

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:53
by canon docre
Zuma wrote:football has to exist for some reason :?:
male bonding?

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:55
by Dark
Male bondage?

Posted: 17 Jun 2006, 21:57
by Zuma
endless TV coverage.....

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 10:10
by robertzombie
I'd like to see England Vs. USA... as long as we won! :eek:

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 16:36
by emilystrange
Dark wrote:Male bondage?
:twisted:

i have to watch brazil/oz after reading that!

i enjoyed yesterday's offerings.. although my angel of a brother was watching le mans 24 hour thing at half time and we missed the second usa sending off. :roll:

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 17:44
by scotty
emilystrange wrote: we missed the second usa sending off. :roll:
So you'd miss David Pleats classic line of :"...since the U.S.A have been down to 9 Men, they've been forced to play a 3-4-3 formation" :lol: :lol:

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 21:03
by emilystrange
hee.. no... i chortled about that a lot. we turned over as the free kick was being taken after sending off.

brazil didn't really deserve to win, did they?

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 21:06
by robertzombie
Not at all. I would've loved to see an Ozy victory.

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 21:21
by emilystrange
i think they'll beat croatia... i wish they'd won. that would have been hilarious.

Posted: 18 Jun 2006, 21:53
by Almiche V
So it's jolly bad luck for the French - ah ha ha ha ha.... ;D

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 07:08
by Ozpat
robertzombie wrote:Not at all. I would've loved to see an Ozy victory.
Certainly...this was the game to achieve that.

They should be able to make it to the next round though. One point against Croatia is enough.

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 10:44
by markfiend
Ozpat wrote:One point against Croatia is enough.
Unless Japan beat Brazil by more than two goals...

OK, one point against Croatia is enough. :lol:

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 10:51
by Ozpat
markfiend wrote:
Ozpat wrote:One point against Croatia is enough.
Unless Japan beat Brazil by more than two goals...

OK, one point against Croatia is enough. :lol:
:lol:

AFAIK in that case the result of Oz - Japan counts and not the total of goals (for and against).

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 10:53
by Badlander
Almiche V wrote:So it's jolly bad luck for the French - ah ha ha ha ha.... ;D
There's more to it than bad luck. Like, they suck. :urff:

What am I doing talking about footy ? :eek: :lol: 8)

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 10:57
by Ozpat
Badlander wrote:
Almiche V wrote:So it's jolly bad luck for the French - ah ha ha ha ha.... ;D
There's more to it than bad luck. Like, they suck. :urff:

What am I doing talking about footy ? :eek: :lol: 8)
I noticed that they are not really a team. The atmosphere isn't that great me think...

Argentina has got the best team I guess.

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 11:03
by markfiend
Ozpat wrote:
markfiend wrote:
Ozpat wrote:One point against Croatia is enough.
Unless Japan beat Brazil by more than two goals...

OK, one point against Croatia is enough. :lol:
:lol:

AFAIK in that case the result of Oz - Japan counts and not the total of goals (for and against).
Oh, right. I had thought it would be goal difference first.

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 11:21
by Badlander
Ozpat wrote: I noticed that they are not really a team. The atmosphere isn't that great me think...
Isn't this crazy how the journalists keep telling us we have some of the best players in the world and still they can't play together ? Or maybe they just don't care. This is a mediocre team at best, and not a very entertaining one. :?

On the other hand, the basketball French championship final at Paris Bercy yesterday was quite groovy. 8)

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 11:37
by Ozpat
Badlander wrote:
Ozpat wrote: I noticed that they are not really a team. The atmosphere isn't that great me think...
Isn't this crazy how the journalists keep telling us we have some of the best players in the world and still they can't play together ? Or maybe they just don't care. This is a mediocre team at best, and not a very entertaining one. :?

On the other hand, the basketball French championship final at Paris Bercy yesterday was quite groovy. 8)
Some of these best players act very snobbish by ignoring younger teammates and just do the things the way they like, backing each others backs. I saw some subsitutes though who played quite well. Not lazy and spoiled but proud to represent their country and giving everything to win the game.

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 11:52
by Quiff Boy
man, i soooooooooooo wanted to australia to beat brazil :!:

they played a great game and proper deserved a win. or at least a point. unlucky :? :(

Posted: 19 Jun 2006, 12:07
by Bartek
agree with mr Q-boy, they desreve to win match.