Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 12:09
2.5 meters.
That's horrible stuff man.
Page 5 of 41
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 12:20
That's horrible stuff man.
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 13:34
I can't imagine what it's been like for the people in Cumbria, It must be devastating. My thoughts go out to all involved
Posted: 26 Nov 2009, 18:46
http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?Newsid=134
reminding me of things like Dublin/Schengen and other developments in ESDP ...
...
reminding me of things like Dublin/Schengen and other developments in ESDP ...
...Posted: 27 Nov 2009, 11:28
Tactical Nuclear Penguin
A warning on the label states: "This is an extremely strong beer; it should be enjoyed in small servings and with an air of aristocratic nonchalance. In exactly the same manner that you would enjoy a fine whisky, a Frank Zappa album or a visit from a friendly yet anxious ghost."
Posted: 27 Nov 2009, 11:35
BrewDog make fantastic booze. Trust the Jockos to invent a beer that could kill a man.
Posted: 27 Nov 2009, 13:44
It's looking increasingly likely that the Chilcot inquiry will come to the conclusion that Tony told fibses..
Posted: 01 Dec 2009, 09:25
funny that, he says they're lyingTony told fibses..
meanwhile
cool - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzKmGTVmqJs this guy is the future (a bit long too but...)
poo - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... first.html
Posted: 03 Dec 2009, 12:57
Will people be apologising en masse to Jan Moir after it turns out everything she said in her article about Gately was actually true?
Posted: 03 Dec 2009, 13:10
What? That he was gay and didn't live a normal lifestyle?DeWinter wrote:Will people be apologising en masse to Jan Moir after it turns out everything she said in her article about Gately was actually true?
Posted: 03 Dec 2009, 13:33
Honestly? That was pretty much what she said. That his death was tragic and a bit seedy. Turns out she was right. As a bi male, I didn't feel offended by her article. I couldn't work out what exactly the great worked-up rage from the GLBT lot was really about. I did find Stephen Fry's contribution rather funny. Especially since his glossing over of Oscar Wilde's life story. No mention of Robbie and Bosie's liking for 14 year olds I notice..Hom_Corleone wrote: What? That he was gay and didn't live a normal lifestyle?
Posted: 03 Dec 2009, 16:32
Posted: 03 Dec 2009, 18:50
czuczu wrote:Milkman
Pretty much sums it up for me.Magnus Talib, a member of the TV8 production team wrote:We never expected the enormous reaction we got; a lot of people were almost blinded with disgust.
Meanwhile, in the wilds of Lancashire...
Man on 'chicken-licking' charge
Does exactly what it says on the tin, and surprisingly SFW...
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 10:29
Man on 'chicken-licking' charge
plain insane - a fine example of equal opportunities and care in the community programmes working well 
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 11:52
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 13:59
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 17:49
Very funny ... so hundreds of years after the Inquisition Tesco and Quitting Hollywood
are still supporting mediaeval standards ... completely brainless, of course ...
are still supporting mediaeval standards ... completely brainless, of course ...
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 17:52
I saw that live on tv, almost got The Wife to drive me to Tesco with me petrol bomb kit.
cnuts...
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 17:54
Merry Christmas ...
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 18:03
blah
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 18:16
currently signing this
Posted: 16 Dec 2009, 00:23
Re: BA Strike
Do we really need cabin crew on planes? If they want to strike, let them. They wont need to be paid and the airline will save money. We dont need people walking up and down the aisles on buses or trains selling us stuff, so why should a plane be any different?
Ah but what about the safety issue?
From the spiel at the beginning of the flight and the safety leaflets all the passengers are supposed to do the hard work of opening the emergency exits, and the safety equipment is designed so that passangers can use them.
So sod the BA staff (except the pilots, they may be useful).
Do we really need cabin crew on planes? If they want to strike, let them. They wont need to be paid and the airline will save money. We dont need people walking up and down the aisles on buses or trains selling us stuff, so why should a plane be any different?
Ah but what about the safety issue?
From the spiel at the beginning of the flight and the safety leaflets all the passengers are supposed to do the hard work of opening the emergency exits, and the safety equipment is designed so that passangers can use them.
So sod the BA staff (except the pilots, they may be useful).
Posted: 16 Dec 2009, 10:28
done!emilystrange wrote:currently signing this
Posted: 16 Dec 2009, 16:16
Posted: 16 Dec 2009, 16:21
Justice! I'm a red sympathiser, the ladies are lookers