I am back from Las Vegas now and can add some belated comments and observations. I will not rehash what others have said unless I can add or clarify something. No, not a real HL interview this time; would there be interest in one? (Note later: Sorry for the length, I just wrote what came to mind.)
1) I was under the impression that Chris (not Ben) was new to Sisters' music. In fact, that ws one of the reasons why he was liked, so that he can add his style to the tracks and not simply reproduce his forebearers.
2) Chris needs to carry a pen with him. He borrowed mine at least half a dozen times to sign autographs.
3) Yes, both Chris and Ben hung around for a while after the gig and chatted up with the remainng fans.
3) Ben has seen a spike of myspace hits since the announcement that he was the new Sisters' guitarist; Chris has not noticed too much of an increase on his myspace page.
4) The new guns would be up for an album release, but none is on the horizon. Chris gts asked this about 40-50 times per gig. (Someone else asked him the question about a release; I followed up about how often he gets asked that.)
5) Ben and Chris have hit it off well. Both speak highly of Andrew as well, but these two are the most likely to hang out together.
6) Chris lost a hundred bucks within a few minutes by playing roulette. Mandalay Bay and the city of Las Vegas thank him.
7) Which is lower: the combined ages of Chris and Ben or that of Andrew?
8
) Both guitarists admitted sound problems, but both were optimistic that they were only early tour kinks which indeed will be remedied.
9) Yes, "Happy birthday, dear Sisters" indeed was heard. It was after the final encore.
10) I am trying to get a scan of the tracklist which shows some amendments (i.e. notes like "dropped" in marker). If I can get it, I will pass it on.
11) I am not sure if the Dr Jeep/Detonation Boulevard medley works well. Even discounting the audio problems, Dr Jeep did not come across well.
12) I for one was pleased to hear no addtional covers. I do not mind if covers are played if they are part of the history (Bruhn and James on
Gimme Shelter tended to be kicking), but otherwise I put money down to see a band play its own songs. I would rather hear an extra five minutes of Sisters track than a joke like a cover of
Angel by the the Kelly Family.
13) No verbal acknowledgements to his new guns on stage, as there had been for Starling and Pearson.
14) Need I add that they indeed played live?
15) Andrew seemed in a good mood, but he also seemed to be concerned about the audio and/or lighting of the set. Not much banter with the audience at all.
16) About the lighting, was it more subdued than previously? To me, the light show is one of the signatures of the Sisters gig.
Summer, for instance, did not seem as vibrant as I remember. The effect at "poimts of light" in
Vision Thing, on the other hand, was well done. Was the stage just not deep enough for the full lighting display, or am I imagining a diluted light show this time?
17) The opening band was a good fit for a Sisters gig. Like Scoda Blush in 1998, they did not take away for the overall feel of the show.
18
) Admittedly, I expected more of an anniversary gig. Other than the Happy Birthday, Dear Sisters rendition, there was no fanfare at all. It was more of an opening gig to a tour than a celebration. If LasVegas is picked to start an anniversary tour, milk it for what it is worth and offer something over the top.
19) No Andrew in an Elvis suit eother. The rest of you can deabte f that is a good thing or not.
20) A bassist was missed, which was a sentiment shared by some of the Sisters touring personnel.
21) It was nice (but not unexpected) to hear some of the newer tracks from the past few years. I did not expect them to be binned with Adam gone.
22) Chris onstage certainly gives some energy to the set. Perhaps more movement since Tim was there. His playing up the riff (in stage presence, niot musically) in
Temple of Love should stay in the set.
23) The showing of his bandages was a nice touch. Just do not squirt from it unless you want comparisons to GWAR.
24) I think that the guy growling to my right thought that it was a GWAR show. From where we were, the crowd was not not too obnoxious. Some bouncing into one another, but not enough to ruin the mood. I am sorry to hear that other parts of the floor were less welcoming.
25) The early start and finishing times were due to the gig being an all ages show. They have to end by 10 o'clock in Las Vegas. Strange that in a place where time is often hidden from the public, the show ended earlier that others will start.
26) Supposedly the balcony seats were more expensive than the floor general admission. I am just as happy to stay on the floor.
27) The intro to FALAA was the same as last summer according to Chris, but others thought that it sounded like the Adam version of the previous few years.
28
) Overall, an enjoyable gig with problems, but nothing to leave the audience feeling cheated. A decent (if uneventful) setlist with a good mix of old and unreleased songs. I am happy to have been there.
29) One of the nicest elements was putting faces to the names of people around here (and on Dominion). Not surprising, there are some nice people in these parts.
Martin