Page 6 of 7
Posted: 27 Jan 2010, 21:15
by MadameButterfly
People are human beings that come from the natural instinct. So of course we have very sexual beings that need sex more than the comman man or woman so this leads to a life of seaking out your prey every time. Going on the human instinct of what attracts you to a sexual partner and then getting it whenever you can. If you don't understand what I've just said or can see yourself in that then you are a person that is monotonous.
When I entered marriage which was one thing I had always said I wouldn't do my whole life, I did it for more reasons than one. And their was no religion involved as my hubby is an athesist and I'm a pagan sort so looking at it from that point we were doomed from the start if looking through religious glasses. We don't teach religion at home at all, leave the school and outside world raise questions as to why? We answer them honestly.
I'm honest as is my hubby. We are flirts or are flirted with. The how many times the boys have eyed my hubby from head to toe and then me just smiling proudly that I've noticed the lust for my man is the same visa versa. The only thing is, we are two totally different people with same ideas but again it keeps the relationship healthy.
All my divorced or single friends with or without children that are enjoying relationships in this category of this thread, I do admire as the jealousy factor is very minimal and it's healthy for those involved to allow the sexual drive enjoy!
Posted: 28 Jan 2010, 01:06
by paint it black
People are human beings
good thinking, far too deep for me
meanwhile
the best team won
Posted: 28 Jan 2010, 21:19
by GC
Listening to The Manics last night, one of their lyrics reminded me of this subject:
"My idea of love comes from,
a childhood glimpse of pornography.
No there is no true love,
just a finely tuned jealousy".
I thought it appropriate but can't expand.....
Posted: 28 Jan 2010, 21:44
by MadameButterfly
Shame poor fella, as a child getting glimpses of pornography growing into someone that doesn't know that true love is out there. Just like soulmates and being at such a comfortable level in the sex department, the mind, the body, the soul, the lust of loving true love.
Cased solved.
Posted: 28 Jan 2010, 22:31
by boudicca
Gollum's Cock wrote:Listening to The Manics last night, one of their lyrics reminded me of this subject:
"My idea of love comes from,
a childhood glimpse of pornography.
No there is no true love,
just a finely tuned jealousy".
I thought it appropriate but can't expand.....
Oof, you were listening to Gold Against The Soul?
Not their finest hour... more bloated than James Brad Deantree before he went on the SlimFast plan
Posted: 29 Jan 2010, 14:48
by GC
boudicca wrote:Gollum's Cock wrote:Listening to The Manics last night, one of their lyrics reminded me of this subject:
"My idea of love comes from,
a childhood glimpse of pornography.
No there is no true love,
just a finely tuned jealousy".
I thought it appropriate but can't expand.....
Oof, you were listening to Gold Against The Soul?
Not their finest hour... more bloated than James Brad Deantree before he went on the SlimFast plan
10 points Boudicca
I always liked "Gold...." it was kind of the Manics' Vision Thing. After Richey 'left' I kind of lost interest.
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 15:11
by Dark
Having been in open relationships for the past few years, I can tell you that it's every bit as brilliant, and every bit as awful as you would think.
The freedom and relaxation is to die for, the inevitable heartache from all involved is to die from.
Citation: I was sleeping with a girl for about 7 months, and she told me on Sunday (after I wanted time alone to sort out my life a bit) that she'd rather not see me again. Because I didn't necessarily want to f**k her every time I went over. s**t sucks, but I'll live.
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 15:33
by emilystrange
that's very shallow of her. you're not a rent boy!
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 16:30
by James Blast
isn't he?
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 20:15
by Izzy HaveMercy
James Blast wrote:isn't he?
Rent apart, now, yes...
IZ.
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 20:25
by James Blast
he's sitting next to me, I'll ask him
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 20:37
by boudicca
Do let us know his answer!
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 20:41
by Debaser
awaits with bated breath.
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 21:42
by James Blast
he replied thus - "In context, probably yes".
happy now?
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 22:11
by MadameButterfly
aww...come here Korin! *gives you hugs and kisses*
Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 22:25
by boudicca
James Blast wrote:he replied thus - "In context, probably yes".
happy now?
Well I hope he charges enough to keep him in dodgy bright green drinks at the QMU bar (he'll know what I'm talking about)
Posted: 08 Feb 2010, 19:38
by Dark
I thought Mr B said "red boy", as he had wine nearby. Then I wasn't sure whether it was "red" or "rent". I guess my answer was fairly accurate regardless.
I'm still pissed off at her, but hey...
Posted: 08 Feb 2010, 20:28
by MadameButterfly
Dark wrote:I thought Mr B said "red boy", as he had wine nearby. Then I wasn't sure whether it was "red" or "rent". I guess my answer was fairly accurate regardless.
I'm still pissed off at her, but hey...
And pissed off you are allowed to be!!
But like the saying goes, there are many more fish in the sea.
Or maybe you can catch a mermaid! Can you imagine
We still love you Dark.
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 11:44
by Erudite
Did this thread ever arrive at a conclusion?
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 11:53
by Silver_Owl
Erudite wrote:Did this thread ever arrive at a conclusion?
Well, not for ATG as he never came back to find out.
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 12:26
by markfiend
Erudite wrote:Did this thread ever arrive at a conclusion?
I think the consensus was: OK for some people, probably not for most, there's potential for hurt, and you probably wouldn't want to bring up kids in that environment.
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 12:33
by Silver_Owl
markfiend wrote:Erudite wrote:Did this thread ever arrive at a conclusion?
I think the consensus was: OK for some people, probably not for most, there's potential for hurt, and you probably wouldn't want to bring up kids in that environment.
Mr. Crowley summed it up nicely. See signature.
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 13:33
by MadameButterfly
Hom_Corleone wrote:markfiend wrote:Erudite wrote:Did this thread ever arrive at a conclusion?
I think the consensus was: OK for some people, probably not for most, there's potential for hurt, and you probably wouldn't want to bring up kids in that environment.
Mr. Crowley summed it up nicely. See signature.
So anyone else want to admit to having one of these relationships?
Do tell all about your experience good and bad please.
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 13:34
by Silver_Owl
MadameButterfly wrote:Hom_Corleone wrote:markfiend wrote: I think the consensus was: OK for some people, probably not for most, there's potential for hurt, and you probably wouldn't want to bring up kids in that environment.
Mr. Crowley summed it up nicely. See signature.
So anyone else want to admit to having one of these relationships?
Do tell all about your experience good and bad please.
Does a threesome count?
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 13:36
by MadameButterfly
Oh YES, please do tell...