The issues with the vocals have been...noted. Simply put, nerves and a lack of experience contributed to a strained performance.
The Marching Men hope to have this rectified by the next performance.

The band after us have some peculiar interests!Dr Poo wrote:What's with the gas mask on stage? Is that there in case somebody farts?
Yes, I know. We have some wrinkles to iron out.moses wrote:Oh dear
We'll be sure not to try your patience.James Blast wrote:Well I'm keeping the faith.
I reckon the vocal wobblings added to the overall effect. This is not uncharted territory for The Girls....timsinister wrote:The entirety has been recorded by a very patient and enduring man, and will be worked on sometime next week.
The issues with the vocals have been...noted. Simply put, nerves and a lack of experience contributed to a strained performance.
The Marching Men hope to have this rectified by the next performance.
People are being very understanding.unholyracket wrote:
I reckon the vocal wobblings added to the overall effect. This is not uncharted territory for The Girls....
High praise indeed! Thankyou...Maisey wrote:but I think he might well have something of his own worth developing on.
Agree with this - based purely on your videos online I must add (I wasn't at the gig). Maybe concentrate on singing the songs in your own way, with a nod in AE's direction, rather than pure mimickry? An interesting experiment all in all. Thumbs up from NZ.Maisey wrote: I think he might well have something of his own worth developing on.
funandprofit wrote:London for a particular show at Brixton...ahem
If you're in Leeds, it would be churlish not to have a gig! I'm sure something could be arranged.then travellingthroughout the week and back at leeds the last Saturday in october.
I'll keep an ear out for shows and if you have any I'll try my best to make it if Im in teh area. Looks liek the world has two Sisters tribute bands now. The more the drearier!
Cheers
Cheers for the comments bearskin, sounds like an honest review.bearskin wrote:Agree with this - based purely on your videos online I must add (I wasn't at the gig). Maybe concentrate on singing the songs in your own way, with a nod in AE's direction, rather than pure mimickry? An interesting experiment all in all. Thumbs up from NZ.Maisey wrote: I think he might well have something of his own worth developing on.
yup, I did think - after I'd posted - that it was probably a daft thing to say - given that your audience is probably looking for as much a Sisters-replica sound as is plausible.timsinister wrote: My natural tone is (obviously) pitched higher than the bedrock-low, tar-stained rumble that emits from the chest of our Paramount Leader - but I'm not confident I could maintain the reality of a 'tribute' by singing that much higher up the register.
It isn't daft at all. I'm not so vainglorious that I can't hear my voice is significantly different to the Paramount Leader's, but as you correctly say, people want to hear as close an approximation as we can manage. And that's pretty damn close.yup, I did think - after I'd posted - that it was probably a daft thing to say - given that your audience is probably looking for as much a Sisters-replica sound as is plausible.
We've considered this at length, exactly what era we like to cover. We came out of it realising that of the original three in the band, we each preferred certain periods of Sisters history. If the three of us in the band couldn't agree on an era, there's no way our fans would. So, we pick and choose from across the ages.Are you planning on focussing your song choices on the early-era (my personal choice) - or even just songs that the current "real band" (such as) touring model don't perform?
Undoubtedly. I would defend certain long-term fans who may have no musical ability themselves, but are intimately aware of how their songs 'should' sound - just because you can't play guitar doesn't stop you from detecting when someone drops a note, or plays half a tone lower than you're used to.Has performing Sisters songs given you renewed respect for the band? I have no musical ability at all, and I think it's all well and good for us all to critique the performances of band's we see, but it must put things in a whole new light when you have to actually try and replicate that sound yourself (and have others comment likewise).
The whole question of 'covers within covers' has definitely come up in discussion. The girls are famous for their covers of unexpected pop classics. We aren't exactly going to break out 'Gimmee Gimmee Gimmee' at our second gig (sorry pop pickers), but at the same time there are certain Sisters versions that are A) too popular and B) too satisfying to play not to add. We'll see who comes along to the party.Also, one thing that crossed my mind was whether you would perform anything "in the style of"? I'm thinking about that band from back when: I think they were called No Way Sis - a tribute band of the worst actual band in history...Oasis (or were Happy Mondays the worst band ever - I get confused?), who did a song that wasn't by the band, but in the style of Oasis. Would you do a cover song - like i suggested in another part of the forum for example: Rhinestone Cowboy - a la Sisters? Just a thought.
<gasp> Is 'Lights' considered an obscure B-side? I would have thought it to be in their Top-3 greatest songs? Genuinely surprised...timsinister wrote: but I went from supsicion over performing an obscure B-side like 'Lights', to relishing what has returned to being a fantastically atmospheric song.