"While we're waiting for the next one to arrive!"
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
I say don't phone em, if they don't know then they can't do anything
Figured I could do worse than research how the NewOrderOnline folks did it. There was a bit of talk at the beginning of their first Community project, but no definitive conclusion.
One interesting snippet is that you cannot be denied the Mechanical Copyright license by law. Whether this is fact or one person's opinion/interpretation is up for grabs though.
I've also gone rooting around various music publisher sites, registered myself as a licensee with BMG (y'never know...) and fired an email off to the MCPS (copy below):
One interesting snippet is that you cannot be denied the Mechanical Copyright license by law. Whether this is fact or one person's opinion/interpretation is up for grabs though.
I've also gone rooting around various music publisher sites, registered myself as a licensee with BMG (y'never know...) and fired an email off to the MCPS (copy below):
Now I know why bands have lawyers and managers...Hi,
Myself and a group of others are planning to record a tribute CD for one of our favourite bands. This will be a privately distributed limited edition (the number of copies is not yet finalised) and any charges will solely cover production costs (i.e. non-profit).
As we are keen to keep everything as legal and above-board as possible, we are interested in learning what the position is with regard to mechanical licensing for such a project.
Thanks,
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- canon docre
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 05 Mar 2005, 21:10
- Location: Mother Prussia
Without wanting to spoil the enthusisam, how high are the chances that Eldritch or Pearson are saying yes to a release of their songs by you guys? Below par I'd guess.
Why not leave out the "charges"- part as it implies that there is actually money to be made (even if it's just to cover the costs). Why not let it run under "demo-tape" without official release. No need to ask anybody for permission there.
If it turns out to be good you can still decide to release it and go through the copyright hassle when it's time. In this early stage it just kills creativity to think about the legal stuff.
Why not leave out the "charges"- part as it implies that there is actually money to be made (even if it's just to cover the costs). Why not let it run under "demo-tape" without official release. No need to ask anybody for permission there.
If it turns out to be good you can still decide to release it and go through the copyright hassle when it's time. In this early stage it just kills creativity to think about the legal stuff.
Put their heads on f*cking pikes in front of the venue for all I care.
Can you do that? Sounds interesting, do tell me more.canon docre wrote:Why not leave out the "charges"- part as it implies that there is actually money to be made (even if it's just to cover the costs). Why not let it run under "demo-tape" without official release. No need to ask anybody for permission there.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- canon docre
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 05 Mar 2005, 21:10
- Location: Mother Prussia
Well, everyone can homerecord whatever they please without asking for permission. Legally, what you do with the Sisters songs is covering them (as long as you dont change the notes, then it's a remix, a totally differnet matter.) Even if they're yet unreleased, you do a coverversion.mh wrote:Can you do that? Sounds interesting, do tell me more.canon docre wrote:Why not leave out the "charges"- part as it implies that there is actually money to be made (even if it's just to cover the costs). Why not let it run under "demo-tape" without official release. No need to ask anybody for permission there.
As long as you dont press them in large quantities for selling them, no one cares.
Put their heads on f*cking pikes in front of the venue for all I care.
canon docre wrote:Well, everyone can homerecord whatever they please without asking for permission. Legally, what you do with the Sisters songs is covering them (as long as you dont change the notes, then it's a remix, a totally differnet matter.) Even if they're yet unreleased, you do a coverversion.mh wrote:Can you do that? Sounds interesting, do tell me more.canon docre wrote:Why not leave out the "charges"- part as it implies that there is actually money to be made (even if it's just to cover the costs). Why not let it run under "demo-tape" without official release. No need to ask anybody for permission there.
As long as you dont press them in large quantities for selling them, no one cares.
OK people, we have a solution.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
the cover still belongs to:
or I'll stab someone, OK?
ah ken how tae deal wi you music biz types
or I'll stab someone, OK?
ah ken how tae deal wi you music biz types
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
Yup, we rename the whole thing to "Canon Docre Walks On Water" and the problem is solved!mh wrote:
OK people, we have a solution.
IZ.
What about accidental changes?canon docre wrote: (as long as you dont change the notes, then it's a remix, a totally differnet matter.)
"These are my principles! And if you don't like the just says so, I have others, too!"
~Rufus T. Firefly
~Rufus T. Firefly
Naturally.James Blast wrote:the cover still belongs to:
or I'll stab someone, OK?
ah ken how tae deal wi you music biz types
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- canon docre
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 05 Mar 2005, 21:10
- Location: Mother Prussia
It's always the same, the Graphic Department is ready and pushy while the recording artists are still contemplating on the running order.James Blast wrote:the cover still belongs to:
or I'll stab someone, OK?
ah ken how tae deal wi you music biz types
Put their heads on f*cking pikes in front of the venue for all I care.
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
and I spent time on this Jess
I feel well stabbed
I feel well stabbed
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
so we're good to go?canon docre wrote:As long as you dont press them in large quantities for selling them, no one cares.
What's the picture behind it?James Blast wrote:and I spent time on this Jess
I feel well stabbed
-
- Underneath the Rock
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 21:26
- Location: People's Republic of Glasgow
- Contact:
Sorry, but that makes no sense to me whatsoever.canon docre wrote:as long as you dont change the notes, then it's a remix
A remix is an alternative mix of a song, using parts (or all) of the original recording. A cover contains none of the original recording.
A cover with notes that have been changed somewhat is still a cover, surely? Every Sisters cover compilation has contained songs that sound immensely different to the original, but they're certainly not remixes.
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
Thought it was Good work indeedmarkfiend wrote:Kirkstall Abbey. Clickyrobertzombie wrote:What's the picture behind it?
Nice cover James
Dark wrote:Sorry, but that makes no sense to me whatsoever.canon docre wrote:as long as you dont change the notes, then it's a remix
A remix is an alternative mix of a song, using parts (or all) of the original recording. A cover contains none of the original recording.
A cover with notes that have been changed somewhat is still a cover, surely? Every Sisters cover compilation has contained songs that sound immensely different to the original, but they're certainly not remixes.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
Bastard! I wanted the is it/isn't it Detroit argument to rage on for a bitmarkfiend wrote:Kirkstall Abbey. Clickyrobertzombie wrote:What's the picture behind it?
Nice cover James
I knew I made it too visible in this edition
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
Well, at first I thought it was the church from Damage Done, so there you goJames Blast wrote:Bastard! I wanted the is it/isn't it Detroit argument to rage on for a bitmarkfiend wrote:Kirkstall Abbey. Clickyrobertzombie wrote:What's the picture behind it?
Nice cover James
I knew I made it too visible in this edition
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
i thought that tooObviousman wrote:Well, at first I thought it was the church from Damage Done, so there you goJames Blast wrote:Bastard! I wanted the is it/isn't it Detroit argument to rage on for a bit
I knew I made it too visible in this edition