Posted: 09 Feb 2010, 14:53
Well, I guess the kid has terroriszed him ... so he had to take on his role as a leader and caring father along the examples at his hand ...
Well, I guess the kid has terroriszed him ... so he had to take on his role as a leader and caring father along the examples at his hand ...
WTF?!?! A four year old terrorising an adult man? Don't make me laugh.Being645 wrote:Well, I guess the kid has terroriszed him ... so he had to take on his role as a leader and caring father along the examples at his hand ...
when in doubt get your Emoticons outmh wrote:I think I detect a hint of sarcasm from our Being.
Sorry dear, but sometimes you simply don't have a clue! The rest I deleted of your post is because it's the same old story and that of an abused child that only sees life from one side. Or it could be your age.Being645 wrote:sarcasm, indeed ... since these are the effects of the "leading culture" performed by those who rule our lives ...
In a way, it is surely right this soldier is being questioned at court ... while the original examples and their
offspring and associates will probably go without the least accountability, since they have law at their service ...
Some of these people, not all of them.MadameButterfly wrote:
it's no wonder these people come back full of aggression or depression
Most abused children see their parents as the entire offenders ... or they agree at some pointMadameButterfly wrote:Sorry dear, but sometimes you simply don't have a clue! The rest I deleted of your post is because it's the same old story and that of an abused child that only sees life from one side. Or it could be your age.Being645 wrote:sarcasm, indeed ... since these are the effects of the "leading culture" performed by those who rule our lives ...
In a way, it is surely right this soldier is being questioned at court ... while the original examples and their
offspring and associates will probably go without the least accountability, since they have law at their service ...
MadameButterfly wrote: No. The support families get from any military person in most countries is zero or minimum to zero. The after effects the brain has to deal with after a man goes to war and kills and sees things to then come back into society there is no support for that family of that person. The post war syndrome is something every country has problems with. The rich countries give drugs to the victims but family support or psychological support of that person is so beyond the extreme that's it's no wonder these people come back full of aggression or depression that they can't carry on with their normal lives!
MadameButterfly wrote: One thing my dear, you and you alone rule your own life ...
I think that this is what Crowley meant by Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.MadameButterfly wrote: One thing my dear, you and you alone rule your own life ...
Yes of course, some people... sorry was typing too quickly.Debaser wrote:Some of these people, not all of them.MadameButterfly wrote:
it's no wonder these people come back full of aggression or depression
Again you are in charge of how you do things in life. The points you have mentioned about minimum rights, well in a first world country I'm sure, but in third world countries, these minimum rights they don't have. People are still dying, starving to death. People are living on the streets thanks to no housing, people are dying from common influenza or malaria just because the health education is not up to standard and people are sending children to work for minimum wages that the first world countries support where as these children should be getting an education.Being645 wrote:Count yourself lucky, if you, personally, can take this for granted ... ...
I think, one can only rule one's own feelings, decide about one's social adjustments and one's actions, accordingly ... and give one's life a try ...
There is no guarantee or right ... there are a few minimum rights as to adequate housing, food, health, education or other such issues, some
countries have agreed to aspire (and partly with reservations) ... not more ...
markfiend wrote:I think that this is what Crowley meant by Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
In other words, yes, what other people do has an effect (whether it's something they do directly to you, or something that affects you, or something that affects your life or whatever).
But you are the person who makes your decisions, no-one else.
Oh yeah.
I'd assumed this was a deliberate p*ss take.Quiff Boy wrote:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 065824.ece
the article's writer has a rather unfortunate name, given the subject matter
Big Brother is watching you.Being645 wrote:Hopefully, you are not "guilty of" any kind of "suspicious behaviour" ... ...
Internet cafes asked to spy on their customers