Posted: 13 Jul 2005, 10:16
'This hairdo's truly evil - I'm not sure it's mine'
(c) Kristin Hersh.
(c) Kristin Hersh.
James, on the other hand, has a hair-don'tRicheyJames wrote:and, james, i don't have a hair-do, i just have hair.
no,it doesn't,on the whole.RicheyJames wrote:a fair point. it was a touch pretentious to quote the original latin but that doesn't make the point any less valid.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:fortunately,i'm neither.RicheyJames wrote:pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
i'd rather be a close-minded cynic than a credulous fool.
quid quid latine dictum sit,altum videtur.
richey james said(did you go to public school?that would explain a lot.)
probably not...however i'll have a go.firstly:a (reasonably) obscure latin quotation;maybe not that indicative of private education,'cause i knew what you meant,but at least indicative of an education.(as is your pedantic attitude to punctuation-not in itself a bad thing).secondly:your debating style ( self-assured,agressive,) is of the kind i have come across when dealing with people who were not taught in state schools (though i'm not saying that it doesnt come naturally- i have been accused of the same myself).thirdly -and mainly- your chagrin at my use of the familiar "mate."the only people i know who find this "vulgar",(when used amiably,albeit inaccurately),have been the (mostly) middle-class families and acquaintances of friends of mine who attended public school.would it? would you be able to describe exactly what you think it might explain without resorting to crude stereotypes?
come now,brother blast of the bar,this is just conversation.James Blast wrote:"...someday this war's gonna end..."
i think your implied suggestion that recent events were in some way conceived by "agents of the state" is at best foolish and at worst distasteful. try to remember that dozens of families are still mourning for those who are missing before peddling your ridiculous theories.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:however,i still think that it is perfectly within the confines of reason to look beyond the obvious with regard to the culpability of the state and it's agents in matters of national security.
LOL. "Self assured", yes. Aggressive????? Think you may be confusing him with me!!eastmidswhizzkid wrote: :your debating style ( self-assured,agressive,)
i have nothing but respect and sympathy for all those affected by recent events.as with 9/11,the families of the victims are often first amongst those questioning the official line.(also,as i'm sure you are well aware,"culpability" covers a far broader spectrum than just carrying out the bombings.)RicheyJames wrote:i think your implied suggestion that recent events were in some way conceived by "agents of the state" is at best foolish and at worst distasteful. try to remember that dozens of families are still mourning for those who are missing before peddling your ridiculous theories.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:however,i still think that it is perfectly within the confines of reason to look beyond the obvious with regard to the culpability of the state and it's agents in matters of national security.
and as someone who shares my concerns about the increasing use of draconian new powers to curtail our centuries old rights i'm sure you'll have already signed the no2id pledge?
as for being the product of a public school: sorry to disappoint but it is still possible to get a perfectly good education in the state sector.
Even here in Belgium, public transportation stopped a couple of minutes to remember the London victims.Johnny M wrote:This is as an aside to the debate that is going on here ...
Remembrance And Defiance
At 12 o'clock noon this Thursday (tomorrow) there's going to be a two minute silence to remember the victims of the bombs which exploded a week earlier, during rush hour last Thursday morning. Buses will stop, businesses will stop, everything still for two minutes.
It's a gesture of compassion and sympathy and remembrance, but also maybe a gesture of defiance - and so there's a thought that wherever we are, we should go out on to the streets, and observe the silence there, in public.
The whole of Britain, standing on our streets, which we will always own and defend, in silence.
Please pass this on to everyone you know
It's being doing the rounds on the London email circuit today and was confirmed in the ES tonite. Red Ken has confirmed that all that he controls will be participating. All the major corporates are going for it as well. I'll take my guys out as well.
Oh, they have. The wrong kind of silence.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:
Don't be daft. People don't usually have any sort of silence for 'funny little brown people'.
unfortunately that is far too true.Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Oh, they have. The wrong kind of silence.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:
Don't be daft. People don't usually have any sort of silence for 'funny little brown people'.
IZ.
i had a similar thought this morning when i read about a small item about that 3 train pile-up in pakistaneastmidswhizzkid wrote:unfortunately that is far too true.Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Oh, they have. The wrong kind of silence.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:
Don't be daft. People don't usually have any sort of silence for 'funny little brown people'.
IZ.
isn't that always the way?Izzy HaveMercy wrote:It feels like we only having respect for the Western World
well it's perfectly understandable that those personally touched by these tragedies should try to find some deeper meaning to events. i fail to see how this excuses you from propogating baseless "theories" which serve only to deflect from the real problem here which is how we explain how a group of young british men can become so radicalised that they believe that blowing themselves up is a reasonable course of action and how we reach out to young muslims so that they feel included in british society rather than pushed into the open arms of extremists.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:i have nothing but respect and sympathy for all those affected by recent events.as with 9/11,the families of the victims are often first amongst those questioning the official line.(also,as i'm sure you are well aware,"culpability" covers a far broader spectrum than just carrying out the bombings.)
really? was this not you then:eastmidswhizzkid wrote:and these are not my theories.if you remember,we were discussing items posted elsewhere.
i didn't see anyone else making those particular points?eastmidswhizzkid wrote:apart from taking the heat off of g.w.bush's (lack of) enviromental commitments at the g8 -not to mention all the lovely new freedom-restricting laws that will ensue.id cards anybody?- would we (london) have still got the olympics if the bombing had happened two days before?i think not.
and another thing- the general election wasnt so long ago.if the intent was the same as is assumed with regard to madrid (ie influencing the electorate against involvement in iraq) why not then?
i have a blinkered world view? is that because i disagree with you? or because i have a natural tendency to treat such garbage with a hefty dose of scepticism?eastmidswhizzkid wrote:perhaps the reason for your blinkered world view lies elsewhere.
I won't be holding my breath though (unfortunately)Mrs RicheyJames wrote:I hope these BNP fuckwits realise this.
Me too. IIUC there was an "incident" at a Mosque in Armley earlier this week; I wouldn't be surprised if the big one in Leeds 6 goes up this weekend. I saw some vaguely skinhead-looking people filling up a large container with diesel last night; that gave me cause for concern. Does diesel work as well as petrol in petrol bombs does anyone know?Mrs RicheyJames wrote:I hope these BNP fuckwits realise this.