Heartland

that gig forms the first part of this evening (give or take a phono paul typo )



http://sheepish.net/kickintheeye/

[edit: added new version of image with corrected typo, and added the website link]

Kick in the ey?

Chairman Bux wrote:Kick in the ey?

Gosh.

How did we miss that?

Poor Paul, he did hurriedly apply a corrected version...that nobody seems to be using!

have changed it for the new flyer... didn't spot he'd done a replacement

Chairman Bux wrote:Kick in the ey?

Surely for a Goth Night in t'People's Republic it chould be Kick in the Aye ??

Whippet in t'Aye?

Kick in the arse is now in Facebookshire...

www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=315877728423602

I think I'll create a new thread for it...

SATURDAY 28TH JANUARY

Forty-five minutes, ten songs, all the heckling you could want.

See you there.

Is this really necessary?

moses wrote:Is this really necessary?

This Life ? Heartland ? the Marching Men ? Shameless self-publicity ?

Whatever the this in your surly question may be, the answer is surely "yes".

Nikolas Vitus Lagartija wrote:

moses wrote:Is this really necessary?

This Life ? Heartland ? the Marching Men ? Shameless self-publicity ?

Whatever the this in your surly question may be, the answer is surely "yes".

Fully seconded.

Nikolas Vitus Lagartija wrote:

moses wrote:Is this really necessary?

This Life ? Heartland ? the Marching Men ? Shameless self-publicity ?

Whatever the this in your surly question may be, the answer is surely "yes".

Surly? Not at all. I just don't see the point of 'tribute' acts nevermind a poor covers band with a vocalist seemingly intent on murdering The Sisters' back catalogue. I was going to use the word masterbation but that may have sounded surly.

moses wrote:

Nikolas Vitus Lagartija wrote:

moses wrote:Is this really necessary?

This Life ? Heartland ? the Marching Men ? Shameless self-publicity ?

Whatever the this in your surly question may be, the answer is surely "yes".

Surly? Not at all. I just don't see the point of 'tribute' acts nevermind a poor covers band with a vocalist seemingly intent on murdering The Sisters' back catalogue. I was going to use the word masterbation but that may have sounded surly.

It's YOUR imagination, after all ...

Hahahahahahaha!!

moses wrote: Surly? Not at all. I just don't see the point of 'tribute' acts nevermind a poor covers band with a vocalist seemingly intent on murdering The Sisters' back catalogue. I was going to use the word masterbation but that may have sounded surly.

You definitely have a point but I would make a distinction between tribute/cover bands in it for the money and a group of fans merely having fun - where's the harm in that ? Especially as there is an invitation to heckle if you don't like it !

Mummy, who is this man and why is he talking about Uncle Tim masturbating?

Phono Paul wrote:Mummy, who is this man and why is he talking about Uncle Tim masturbating?

Dunno, but he can go f*ck himself.

Norman Hunter wrote:

Phono Paul wrote:Mummy, who is this man and why is he talking about Uncle Tim masturbating?

Dunno, but he can go f*ck himself.

Now that is surly!

*shrug*

It's the internet. Everyone's entitled to their opinion.

He cares enough to comment, if only our fans would do the same!

Nikolas Vitus Lagartija wrote:Especially as there is an invitation to heckle if you don't like it !

Or if you do.

Why is this in Sisters chat anyway?

Aazhyd wrote:Why is this in Sisters chat anyway?

well firstly they are a tribute band to the Sisters, secondly if our boss didn't want it in here it would have been moved ages ago & thirdly don't worry your mind about it, a wise person once said, "if you have nothing nice to say then just shut the f**k up".

oh & moses, not all of us feel the same sentiments as you do.

Aazhyd wrote:Why is this in Sisters chat anyway?

Because Sisters Chat is all about The Sisters and what some of their fanbase make of it - in this case also beyond chatting? ... ...

MadameButterfly wrote: oh & moses, not all of us feel the same sentiments as you do.

Which obviously means that I can't voice mine.