Page 2 of 3
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 18:12
by eastmidswhizzkid
markfiend wrote:astrababe wrote:When exactly did he shave his hair off and why? Any explanations? I know it got progressively shorter but then it was just gone.
I'm not sure exactly
when, but
why seems to be a case of "less hair to comb, more face to wash" as the saying goes.
Ten years of black hair dye and then another ten of bleach seem to have taken their toll.
"Baldnesse, thee greate levellere, cometh to alle men."
it's ok for women -if you're male there's a 98% chance that you'll end up with either a skinhead or a "perry comb-over" in middle-age. which would you go for?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 18:17
by Obviousman
I'll get a comb-over, obviously
Err, no way, actually
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 18:25
by James Blast
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:if you're male there's a 98% chance that you'll end up with either a skinhead or a "perry comb-over" in middle-age. which would you go for?
a syrup, inna Bill Steers stylee
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 18:26
by Badlander
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:
it's ok for women -if you're male there's a 98% chance that you'll end up with either a skinhead or a "perry comb-over" in middle-age. which would you go for?
I don't have to choose... yet. I was a skinhead (well, physically speaking) for about 2 years, so it wouldn't really be something new.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 20:45
by astrababe
Any more pics of Andrew sans shades please? I cannot find anything other than the first 2 posted.
Thx!
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 20:55
by Badlander
astrababe wrote:Any more pics of Andrew sans shades please? I cannot find anything other than the first 2 posted.
Thx!
Take a look at the photo gallery. I think we may have a pic of
sans glasses at a St Pauli game. And above else remember : there's only a few of these pics 'round here, simply because
doesn't want to be seen with the shades off.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:08
by astrababe
Badlander wrote:Take a look at the photo gallery. I think we may have a pic of
sans glasses at a St Pauli game. And above else remember : there's only a few of these pics 'round here, simply because
doesn't want to be seen with the shades off.
I looked in there but will check it again for that pic. Thank you.
The no glasses pics seem to be as rare as smiling pics of little Andy. He is TOO CUTE when he smiles
No, I am not 15, I just talk that way sometimes.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:12
by Big Si
astrababe wrote:Badlander wrote:Take a look at the photo gallery. I think we may have a pic of
sans glasses at a St Pauli game. And above else remember : there's only a few of these pics 'round here, simply because
doesn't want to be seen with the shades off.
I looked in there but will check it again for that pic. Thank you.
The no glasses pics seem to be as rare as smiling pics of little Andy. He is TOO CUTE when he smiles
No, I am not 15, I just talk that way sometimes.
But his best look ever is with the beard!
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:15
by Badlander
astrababe wrote:
No, I am not 15, I just talk that way sometimes.
You're not the first.
Into Brett Anderson ?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:18
by EvilBastard
Big Si wrote:But his best look ever is with the beard!
I'm inclined to agree, although the first time I saw the Dominion single cover I though "Oooh, it's another Dave Stewart solo project"
"Silly Bastard, very very silly - now fetch your coat"
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:19
by lachert
if you don't scare look at this:
use photoshop or something to remove frames
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 21:27
by astrababe
Badlander wrote:Into Brett Anderson ?
Yes, Brett is a demi-god.
Maybe original Sisters of Mercy/original Suede would be a good tour?? I would pay BIG bucks to see that. Anyone else?
Christ on a stick, I just found that photo of Andrew at the stadium with no glasses. Goddamn he looked GOOD.
P.S.: Thank you all for being so welcoming and understanding with my fucktarded questions.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:03
by Badlander
Suede's first was a brilliant album, that we all know. Too bad Butler left, he was such a gifted geetarist. His first solo effort had some nice tunes.
Never had much interest in Suede after that. I even found them quite boring.
P.S.: Thank you all for being so welcoming and understanding with my fucktarded questions.
HL is open all night. The fun never stops and everybody's invited.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:07
by James Blast
as much as I adore early Suede, I think they'd be a strange bedfellow for this new
IGMâ„¢
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:12
by Badlander
James Blast wrote:as much as I adore early Suede, I think they'd be a strange bedfellow for this new
IGMâ„¢
Sorry but me be stoopeed. IGM ? International general meeting ?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:25
by Ramone
When people bang on about the Crow being an uber goth movie, it's almost as unbearable to listen to as people who believe that the Rocky Horror Show is some sort of landmark movie. But a land mark it is indeed.. but for all the wrong reasons. It's a one joke travesty of time with tacky songs and men in tights..bit like Alien Sex Fiend!
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:28
by aims
The music or the t-shirts?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:35
by Badlander
Ramone wrote:When people bang on about the Crow being an uber goth movie, it's almost as unbearable to listen to as people who believe that the Rocky Horror Show is some sort of landmark movie. But a land mark it is indeed.. but for all the wrong reasons. It's a one joke travesty of time with tacky songs and men in tights..bit like Alien Sex Fiend!
Rocky was supposed to make you laugh and have a good time and it did just that.
The crow makes you laugh by accident.
What's wrong with Rocky ? Fine tunes, fine actors, fine production. It's honestly good.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:43
by James Blast
to answer several posts in one-
IGMâ„¢ - Industrial Groove Machine
RHPS - dreadful, heinous, not funny and certainly not musically entertaining
t-shirts - nice, if only they were advertising something else, like tomato soup
The Crow - Liked it, apart from the TKK, obviously
will that do?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:48
by czuczu
James Blast wrote:
RHPS - dreadful, heinous, not funny and certainly not musically entertaining
I thought that was RHCP?
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 23:58
by James Blast
czuczu wrote:James Blast wrote:
RHPS - dreadful, heinous, not funny and certainly not musically entertaining
I thought that was RHCP?
and them
the
Bastards!
thank you
cz
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 00:03
by Badlander
James Blast wrote:
IGMâ„¢ - Industrial Groove Machine
Me feel even more stoopeedo.
RHPS - dreadful, heinous, not funny and certainly not musically entertaining
It can only be Jim Steinman's fault. After all he's the one who made Meatloaf what he is.
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 00:10
by eastmidswhizzkid
Suede: heard a very early live gig of theirs and was reminded of bauhaus.
the rocky horror picture show is horrendous- for all the reasons given above and simply because it's a musical. i went out with this rocky horror obsessive once ...it didn't last.
however my son's name is Rocky, and he
is "horrorshow".
RHCP are shi
te. except "give it away".
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 00:17
by Badlander
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:
RHCP are shite. except "give it away".
RHCP are s**t, including Give it away.
Wait...
Oh crap, is that
really a topic I wanna discuss ? They suck anyway.
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 00:26
by James Blast
the original line-up of Suede wrote and recordrd some ace tunes
Lee, check out
they were one of those bands like EATB and Mansun that released a string of great singles, with even better b-sides
BTW, The Hawk has taken wings, comrade