Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 22:57
yeah, 2003 for me too
"Excellent song. Great lyrics".
Something like that, wasn't it? Binned at over 20 pages?
Page 2 of 6
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:20
Me 3.
"Excellent song. Great lyrics".
Something like that, wasn't it? Binned at over 20 pages?
"Excellent song. Great lyrics".
Something like that, wasn't it? Binned at over 20 pages?
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:50
This has started in 2003? Boy, that´s what I call a tradition! Traditions are there to give a "standardized" situation/routine to enable various people of a community to acknowledge and strengthen the sense of being part of a community. So this is an important piece of work for the community we do here. As all will be binned, it is an espacially great sacrifice for the
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:50
... when DikMik left, the writing was on the wall, then Del left...
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:51
post
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:51
counting
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 23:52
whores
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 00:05
... it all fell down when Lemmy left/was sacked (for the second time)...
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 00:12
Oh, I thought you were talking about the Indeed-thread thingy..
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 00:17
Indeed, we were... I think.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 00:25
Oh. Well, on toppic then, did you know that
Lamb Ass Jet and
Jams as belt were anagrams of your name?
As well as
let bass jam.
Edited? INDEED! Stylish to the bin!
Lamb Ass Jet and
Jams as belt were anagrams of your name?
As well as
let bass jam.
Edited? INDEED! Stylish to the bin!
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 00:52
In thought
In word
........
In word
........
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 07:21
Indeed.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 08:57
Yeah! 
Now quick, cover my ass before they log in....
Now quick, cover my ass before they log in....
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 09:47
I'm saying nothing.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 11:18
@Mr. mod Mark: Is this the new order, it´s no longer "indeed", it´s "nothing?"
Indeed? Then I have to ad:
NOTHING!
Indeed? Then I have to ad:
NOTHING!
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 12:33
Why?markfiend wrote:I'm saying nothing.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 12:34
Why not??scotty wrote:Why?markfiend wrote:I'm saying nothing.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 13:08
scotty wrote:Why not??scotty wrote:Why?markfiend wrote:I'm saying nothing.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 13:54
What good is that bat in your face, Mark?
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 17:10
Rather.
IZ.
IZ.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 17:13
On the matter of when this Valentine threads first appeared, I also was with the first one. Which makes me a veteran.
Quiffy knows for sure when it was, but I fear he won't tell us. He'd just tell us OFF.
But IIRC, Zeno had some Google Cache Evidence about this, no?
IZ.
Quiffy knows for sure when it was, but I fear he won't tell us. He'd just tell us OFF.
But IIRC, Zeno had some Google Cache Evidence about this, no?
IZ.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 17:45
If you could give me some exact words said in that thread I'd probably be able to find it but I can't find it right awayIzzy HaveMercy wrote:But IIRC, Zeno had some Google Cache Evidence about this, no?
IZ.
Twas in the Slept topic I used this google-cache thing apparently, even seem to remember you retrieved the Valentine thread afterwards indeed... Important thing being I managed to get indeed in this reply
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 18:26
It is really simple.Obviousman wrote:If you could give me some exact words said in that thread I'd probably be able to find it but I can't find it right awayIzzy HaveMercy wrote:But IIRC, Zeno had some Google Cache Evidence about this, no?
IZ.
Important thing being I managed to get indeed in this reply
Someone replied that his/her use "of the word INDEED was turning this topic into a farce!"
And the word 'farce' ain't often used here on the board
IZ.
Posted: 15 Sep 2006, 18:28
Has anyone noticed that we are ON TOPIC in this thread?
We are actually really discussing the old Valentine thread without derailment (So far...!
IZ.
We are actually really discussing the old Valentine thread without derailment (So far...!
IZ.