Page 2 of 3
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 17:13
by bushman*pm
WOT THE FCUK IS FUD YOU BSTRARSDS!!
I WARN YOU I DONT TEASE WELL!
THINK OF IT LIKE WEARING A BLINDFOLD AND NOT KNOWING ITS A JAPANESE AKITA'S TAIL YOU ARE MERCILESSLY TUGGING!!
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 17:40
by Dark
Some stupid Scottish word meaning "c**t", apparently used in a friendly manner.
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 17:53
by bushman*pm
ive been to scotland many times but never been referred to
as a 'clot' , well not to my face anyway!
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 18:48
by Dark
It meant cunt.
"Fud".
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 18:51
by James Blast
Whit a CLOT!
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 21:01
by 9while9
Dark wrote:Some stupid Scottish word meaning "c**t", apparently used in a friendly manner.
Indeed!.......
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 21:50
by James Blast
9while9 wrote:Indeed!
By Jove! I think he's got it.
Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 22:04
by weebleswobble
James Blast wrote:9while9 wrote:Indeed!
By Jove! I think he's got it.
...it's a state of mind....
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 10:40
by bushman*pm
excellent typeface, but how did 'dark' get c**t passed
the obergruppenfurher??!!
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 16:16
by Dark
By trying.
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 16:30
by aims
Note to Self: Submit patch to phpBB which gets rid of null tags and reparses for censorship afterwards
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 16:33
by 9while9
Motz wrote:Note to Self: Submit patch to phpBB which gets rid of null tags and reparses for censorship afterwards
Is that like a stabbing?
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 16:34
by aims
Sort of
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 16:52
by Dark
I'll find a way around it.
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 17:03
by aims
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 17:11
by Dark
"
"
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 17:22
by aims
Too bad that doesn't appear when I'm browsing in lynx or w3
The obvious solution is "
cunt", but with some intelligent parsing to remove redundant tags (and heaven forbid, maybe it could output decent HTML while we're at it
), it shouldn't be too difficult to prevent.
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 17:31
by James Blast
Dark wrote:"
"
the typeface is wrong
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 18:42
by Dark
Really? Considering it was a screenshot from this forum, I don't think so.
But then, if anyone's not using Dr Jeep, then they don't deserve perfection.
Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 18:59
by James Blast
contrast and compare
"
"
"cu
nt."
or
for those of you viewing in black and white
Posted: 02 Oct 2006, 09:58
by markfiend
You must have your monitor on different settings to me
James:
Posted: 03 Oct 2006, 07:43
by nigel d
markfiend wrote:You must have your monitor on different settings to me
James:
people , this has now turned into a contest to see how many times the word "c**t" gets posted in one thread, has it not?
Posted: 03 Oct 2006, 09:29
by Nic
nigel d wrote:markfiend wrote:You must have your monitor on different settings to me
James:
people , this has now turned into a contest to see how many times the word "c**t" gets posted in one thread, has it not?
Say what, you c*nt?!
Posted: 03 Oct 2006, 10:12
by markfiend
Posted: 03 Oct 2006, 17:35
by James Blast
