Page 2 of 2

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 00:36
by mh
Big Si wrote:
christophe wrote:
James Blast wrote:You're in good company :D
oi ;D I didn't know there where more of us out here :P

I like the fact it are digipaks, they make it worth the buy. the music is sh1t anyway :wink:
Company? Make that a Regiment 8)
Battallion, more like. :notworthy:

http://myheartland.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11673 :innocent:

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 00:48
by Petseri
mh wrote:
Big Si wrote:Company? Make that a Regiment 8)
Battallion, more like. :notworthy:

http://myheartland.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11673 :innocent:
Yes, please send such comments to that thread so that we do not contaminate this one with such nonsense. ;D

Fortunately, a battalion is smaller than a regiment, so there are fewer of you out there than some of you think. :innocent:

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 00:51
by mh
Petseri wrote:
mh wrote:
Big Si wrote:Company? Make that a Regiment 8)
Battallion, more like. :notworthy:

http://myheartland.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11673 :innocent:
Yes, please send such comments to that thread so that we do not contaminate this one with such nonsense. ;D

Fortunately, a battalion is smaller than a regiment, so there are fewer of you out there than some of you think. :innocent:
Nutz. :oops: :lol: :notworthy:

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 00:54
by Big Si
Petseri wrote:
mh wrote:
Big Si wrote:Company? Make that a Regiment 8)
Battallion, more like. :notworthy:

http://myheartland.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11673 :innocent:
Yes, please send such comments to that thread so that we do not contaminate this one with such nonsense. ;D

Fortunately, a battalion is smaller than a regiment, so there are fewer of you out there than some of you think. :innocent:
Nah, we're more :wink:
James Blast wrote:Our name is Legion, for we are many.
;D

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 00:56
by Syberberg
Nic wrote:
James Blast wrote:I don't have 20/20, but I have now checked it 38 times, and the spacing is wrong.
Or do I have thee ultimate collectors' item? ;D
I that case, the "Sisters of" looks the same to me?!

Can somebody measure? :lol:
Well spotted nic, so there's two typos on the spine then.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 01:01
by Nic
Syberberg wrote:
Nic wrote:
James Blast wrote:I don't have 20/20, but I have now checked it 38 times, and the spacing is wrong.
Or do I have thee ultimate collectors' item? ;D
I that case, the "Sisters of" looks the same to me?!

Can somebody measure? :lol:
Well spotted nic, so there's two typos on the spine then.
Two, or none? :?

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 01:06
by Syberberg
Nic wrote:
Syberberg wrote:
Nic wrote: I that case, the "Sisters of" looks the same to me?!

Can somebody measure? :lol:
Well spotted nic, so there's two typos on the spine then.
Two, or none? :?
Two. There's a blatant difference between the spacing. The spine reads

"THE SISTERSOF MERCY FIRST ANDLAST AND ALWAYS"

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 01:12
by Nic
Sure it's not "THE SISTERSOFMERCY FIRST ANDLAST AND ALWAYS" ?

This is all your fault James!

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 01:29
by Syberberg
Nic wrote:Sure it's not "THE SISTERSOFMERCY FIRST ANDLAST AND ALWAYS" ?

This is all your fault James!
Yep, sure. As I don't and will never own these items, I've only been able to zoom in on the scans, but even so I can still spot the mistake.

And yes, it's James' fault for pointing it out, but ultimate blame lies with the lack of quality control at the printers.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 10:24
by markfiend
Don't blame the printers. They just print what they're told to print. The proofs should have been checked by the designers.

The buck stops here.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 11:12
by mh
In all honesty, the first copy of FALAA I ever had was a cassette of the 85 version, and that was riddled with typos. There were 3 different variants on "A Rock and a Hard Place".

Didn't detract one little bit from the music within.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 11:47
by hallucienate
mh wrote:In all honesty, the first copy of FALAA I ever had was a cassette of the 85 version, and that was riddled with typos. There were 3 different variants on "A Rock and a Hard Place".

Didn't detract one little bit from the music within.
It took the CD release to do that ;)

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 12:33
by James Blast
Syberberg wrote:And yes, it's James' fault for pointing it out
Hey, don't shoot the messenger! It's the sort of thing you trainspotters love anyway. ;D

and Fiendy is right about the proofs

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 13:18
by markfiend
:lol: I have, in the past, learned that one to my cost...

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 14:04
by Syberberg
Ok, so it's the designers' fault...maybe they shoud employ someone with better work ethics then :wink:

mh I've got a copy of the cassette as well...not noticed the typos before, I'll have to have a check when I'm next near it. My tape collection is still Up North in storage.

Hmmm...I may be starting to come around to the idea of actually buying these things.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006, 14:49
by mh
hallucienate wrote:
mh wrote:In all honesty, the first copy of FALAA I ever had was a cassette of the 85 version, and that was riddled with typos. There were 3 different variants on "A Rock and a Hard Place".

Didn't detract one little bit from the music within.
It took the CD release to do that ;)
:notworthy: :lol: :notworthy: :lol:

Cos they corrected the typos. :D

We need FALAA with typos. It's tradition, and part of what makes it a great LP!