Page 2 of 2

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 00:32
by mh
Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
Programming geek! :notworthy: :lol: :twisted: ;D

Re: re:

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 03:35
by RetroGoth
mh wrote:
Ocean Moves wrote:
RetroGoth wrote:Not bought a Sisters bootleg for 16 years!
all fool you then !

seriously though - I'm embarissed by this release. skipping tracks,
band name and album name printed wrong...... its pathetic that they
can't even get these basic things right, when they know it's a band
who's audience care about this kind of stuff. and it's remastered?
is it really?? this record company is too lazy to get the same font on
the cd poster as is on ALL THREE of the cd's....you think they really pulled
the stops out to do a good job of the remaster? I don't think so.

it's a cheap, poor cash in. as for thinking it indicates a new release....
blissful thinking, but totally unfounded IMO.
Negative waves man, negative waves!
When I was at college, circa 1990, I was given loads of Sisters bootlegs from fellow fans. Then I discovered the internet :innocent:

Not a case of being foolish really, just don't want to support what can be seen as an illegal trade that is cashing in on the band (any band, not just :von: ). I'd sooner say to the artist "I have some bootlegs of your work, fancy a few pints or whatever". I'm all for supporting the artist. That it unless it's hussey whom is more p*ss artist. I'd sooner smash his face in over the Planet X incident, as mentioned in one of my earlier posts.

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 05:03
by 8.5
mh wrote:
Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
Programming geek! :notworthy: :lol: :twisted: ;D
I thought it was a 1984 reference...

Re: re:

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 05:12
by weebleswobble
RetroGoth wrote: I'd sooner smash his face in over the Planet X incident, as mentioned in one of my earlier posts.
:eek: :lol:

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 08:40
by aims
8.5 wrote:
mh wrote:
Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
Programming geek! :notworthy: :lol: :twisted: ;D
I thought it was a 1984 reference...
Nope, that'd be 'ungood += 2', not 'pre-increment ungood' :innocent:

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 09:30
by weebleswobble
Motz wrote:
8.5 wrote:
mh wrote: Programming geek! :notworthy: :lol: :twisted: ;D
I thought it was a 1984 reference...
Nope, that'd be 'ungood += 2', not 'pre-increment ungood' :innocent:
Big Brother is watching YOU ;D

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 11:31
by Obviousman
weebleswobble wrote:Big Brother is watching YOU ;D
In Soviet Russia you watch Big Brother!

Posted: 17 Nov 2006, 03:35
by sultan2075
8.5 wrote:
mh wrote:
Maisey wrote:Dude, those are some ++ungood vibes.
Programming geek! :notworthy: :lol: :twisted: ;D
I thought it was a 1984 reference...

As did I...doubleplusungood. Then again, I'm literate.


Also drunk!
EDIT: Very drunk, because my friends are bad people!