Posted: 08 Apr 2007, 00:47
I am not signing anyone's paychecks but a live bassist would be a good addition to the lineup. Sound-wise, I think that the result is better (pending audio at the venue) than the current situation. Visually, the benefits are similarly noticeable. With the VT lineup, Tony would wander from side to side and add to the performance. For example, he and Andreas in synch, side by side -- that was cool. That was a rock (and rocking) performance. That is something which has not been offered since the 1990-1991 quartet.
I like the current lineup, but much like the past decade, it comes across as Andrew and two bookends. I tended to be on the right side of the stage as you face it when I saw them last year, so I can not comment too much on Ben. However, Chris puts on an energetic show with his jumping around and fading back a bit into the smoke at imes. It definitely adds to the atmosphere and performance. He and Ben do switch sides for one song, but otherwise they are fixed to their positions for much of the night. Having an added element of a fourth live member on stage would heighten the presentation visually. I think that the sound too would be better than what the solely pre-programmed bass offers.
I like the current lineup, but much like the past decade, it comes across as Andrew and two bookends. I tended to be on the right side of the stage as you face it when I saw them last year, so I can not comment too much on Ben. However, Chris puts on an energetic show with his jumping around and fading back a bit into the smoke at imes. It definitely adds to the atmosphere and performance. He and Ben do switch sides for one song, but otherwise they are fixed to their positions for much of the night. Having an added element of a fourth live member on stage would heighten the presentation visually. I think that the sound too would be better than what the solely pre-programmed bass offers.