Re: Safari
Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 21:04
Thread seems far moe interesting nowHom_Corleone wrote:True. I suppose it is fair game. As you were.
Sorry fellow Rams fan
Page 2 of 2
Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 21:14
Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 22:06
It's also a fragrance by Ralph Lauren; I think my mom used to wear it back in the day...
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 14:46
Tell me! Free? Where to get? Sounds goodQuiff Boy wrote:(i actually use UNO for my mac so all apps have that nice light-metallic aqua skin
Anyhoo, use Firefox too, plugins are the best thing ever invented! It does tend to crash every now and then though
For the Macmen, just had this in a newsletter: First impressions of Leopard (in German, but you get the point when looking at the piccies
)And Safari is a great song by Nacht und Nebel too, by the way
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 15:14
yep, its freeObviousman wrote:Tell me! Free? Where to get? Sounds goodQuiff Boy wrote:(i actually use UNO for my mac so all apps have that nice light-metallic aqua skin
UNO - 1.5.1
lovely
i temporarily uninstalled it a couple of weeks ago to remind myself what the original ui was like and tbh i really didnt like the mix of aqua, cocoa, dark metal, etc
i seen re-installed it
with uno all applications look like part of the same OS. its a nice, seemless gui integration
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 15:19
@ hal: blurry fonts - http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/200 ... ml?hi=joel
also, afaik its a setting in the pc version of safari to change the way it ant-aliases
i still prefer its approach to that of ie7 & vista though
etcJoel Spolsky wrote:Apple and Microsoft have always disagreed in how to display fonts on computer displays. Today, both companies are using sub-pixel rendering to coax sharper-looking fonts out of typical low resolution screens. Where they differ is in philosophy.
- Apple generally believes that the goal of the algorithm should be to preserve the design of the typeface as much as possible, even at the cost of a little bit of blurriness.
- Microsoft generally believes that the shape of each letter should be hammered into pixel boundaries to prevent blur and improve readability, even at the cost of not being true to the typeface.
Now that Safari for Windows is available, which goes to great trouble to use Apple's rendering algorithms, you can actually compare the philosophies side-by-side on the very same monitor and see what I mean. I think you'll notice the difference. Apple's fonts are indeed fuzzy, with blurry edges, but at small font sizes, there seems to be much more variation between different font families, because their rendering is truer to what the font would look like if it were printed at high resolution.
also, afaik its a setting in the pc version of safari to change the way it ant-aliases
i still prefer its approach to that of ie7 & vista though
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 16:43
Well, that's only to be expected; Apple is the designers' computer, whereas PCs are for illiterates
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 18:20
Revr'ndmarkfiend wrote:Well, that's only to be expected; Apple is the designers' computer, whereas PCs are for illiterates
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 21:41
Heeheehee!
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 21:44
Ililtretes.....Ililtretes.....waht do you maen Ililtretes?markfiend wrote:Well, that's only to be expected; Apple is the designers' computer, whereas PCs are for illiterates
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 21:45
I've had a good look through the thread and I can't find any animals anywhere.
I want a refund
I want a refund
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 21:55
Carpathian Psychonaut wrote:I want a refund
Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 22:01
Now that's what I call service. Good stuff.
Posted: 14 Jun 2007, 09:47
Thanks for that boss, me likey.Quiff Boy wrote: UNO - 1.5.1