Page 2 of 2
Posted: 18 Jul 2007, 21:59
by Dark
Well, as far as I'm aware, the legal age of consent is 16, but 14-16 is a bit of a grey area. Two 15-year-olds having sex would likely not get taken down for it. Though if there were such a case taken to the courts, it would be the male (assuming male/female) that got sent down. That's how it works, sadly. Even though when I was 15, I knew far more females who had had sex than males.
That girl looks ~15. Chances are, since Rob Z's only a couple of years older, nowt would happen.
Posted: 18 Jul 2007, 22:05
by 9while9
Dark wrote:Well, as far as I'm aware, the legal age of consent is 16, but 14-16 is a bit of a grey area. Two 15-year-olds having sex would likely not get taken down for it. Though if there were such a case taken to the courts, it would be the male (assuming male/female) that got sent down. That's how it works, sadly. Even though when I was 15, I knew far more females who had had sex than males.
That girl looks ~15. Chances are, since Rob Z's only a couple of years older, nowt would happen.
Sure,
roll the dice......
(Huge embedded picture turned into linky by markfiend)
But
don't drop the soap, Robert........
Posted: 18 Jul 2007, 22:58
by 6FeetOver
I find it interesting that it's still "socially acceptable" for (oooooooogly) old men to date/marry/mess around with much younger women, but older women (even if they're fit and keep themselves looking good!) are considered "perverts" for going after younger men (of course, this doesn't always apply; see Demi Moore/Ashton What'shishomelyface).
I say, f*ck it.
<---Pervert, and always will be. And damn proud of it, too. \m/
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 02:30
by D.A.
More fashionable than you may think....
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 03:39
by weebleswobble
I like hoover attatchments, am I a perv to then?
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 04:26
by 9while9
weebleswobble wrote:I like hoover attatchments, am I a perv to then?
Not if you're a
Ginger........
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 05:10
by weebleswobble
9while9 wrote:weebleswobble wrote:I like hoover attatchments, am I a perv to then?
Not if you're a
Ginger........
Ah yes the
rulebook:
F*ck You I'll do what I want, cause I is ging-er!
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 07:22
by Dark
Orange Boi, would you mind shrinking the pictures?
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 10:21
by markfiend
Dark wrote:Orange Boi, would you mind shrinking the pictures?
I've done it. Moderator power!
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 13:45
by robertzombie
Dark wrote:That girl looks ~15. Chances are, since Rob Z's only a couple of years older, nowt would happen.
Only one way to find out...
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:06
by 6FeetOver
(Huge embedded picture turned into linky by markfiend)
AHAHAHAHA!
Mark, thank you for setting an example. Henceforward, I shall not be afraid to follow suit.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:11
by streamline
robertzombie wrote:Dark wrote:That girl looks ~15. Chances are, since Rob Z's only a couple of years older, nowt would happen.
Only one way to find out...
May the force be with you, young jedi
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:32
by 9while9
weebleswobble wrote:9while9 wrote:weebleswobble wrote:I like hoover attatchments, am I a perv to then?
Not if you're a
Ginger........
Ah yes the
rulebook:
F*ck You I'll do what I want, cause I is ging-er!
Indeed!
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:34
by 9while9
markfiend wrote:Dark wrote:Orange Boi, would you mind shrinking the pictures?
I've done it. Moderator power!
Sorry Mark..
I just thought it made a
big statement at that size.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:40
by 6FeetOver
A big statement isn't always necessary, though. Some of us can actually appreciate subtlety... Amazing, innit?
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 16:41
by emilystrange
i myself am not a big statement.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 17:21
by Dark
But god help us if we ever fail to appreciate your subtlety, Miss.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 18:10
by 6FeetOver
Miss Ems' avatar statement's nothing if not subtle.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 18:12
by Brideoffrankenstein
The "black eyeliner beauty tips" look pretty sh!te - look at the wonky drawn on eyebrows!