Posted: 22 Feb 2008, 22:08
excuse me, I meant "Trad Goth"paul wrote:Nope, as I said before, a matter of "feeling"James Blast wrote:'Goth' is a matter of age, it seems...
The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
excuse me, I meant "Trad Goth"paul wrote:Nope, as I said before, a matter of "feeling"James Blast wrote:'Goth' is a matter of age, it seems...
The Goth scene is still undead!!!paul wrote:The Goth movement might be dead...
So I take it then that you can tell me what quality it is that makes the Sisters goth while Motorhead, the VU, and the Doors are not? Your list was Black coats, sunnglasses, graveyard photoshoots, dark and melancholic music, strobelights ... so what's the defining factor?paul wrote:
some people can be really persistent in their denial.
edit: the whole thing isn't a silly argument, we call it the truth
There's no defining factor, but these qualities combined make it goth IMHO ...sultan2075 wrote:So I take it then that you can tell me what quality it is that makes the Sisters goth while Motorhead, the VU, and the Doors are not? Your list was Black coats, sunnglasses, graveyard photoshoots, dark and melancholic music, strobelights ... so what's the defining factor?paul wrote:
some people can be really persistent in their denial.
edit: the whole thing isn't a silly argument, we call it the truth
Hom_Corleone wrote: one mans goff is another mans techno.
But somehow a great many of the other bands that have all of these qualities aren't? That makes no sense.paul wrote:There's no defining factor, but these qualities combined make it goth IMHO ...sultan2075 wrote:So I take it then that you can tell me what quality it is that makes the Sisters goth while Motorhead, the VU, and the Doors are not? Your list was Black coats, sunnglasses, graveyard photoshoots, dark and melancholic music, strobelights ... so what's the defining factor?paul wrote:
some people can be really persistent in their denial.
edit: the whole thing isn't a silly argument, we call it the truth
I don't agree! "Goth" was there before the industry discovered it! Ofcourse the industry wanted to make money out of it as soon as they noticed there was a market.nowayjose wrote:"Goth" is just a label created by the industry to increase demand.
One thing I will say in the defence of "goth", it took a lot longer to become commercialised than some other counter-cultures.paul wrote:I don't agree! "Goth" was there before the industry discovered it! Ofcourse the industry wanted to make money out of it as soon as they noticed there was a market.nowayjose wrote:"Goth" is just a label created by the industry to increase demand.
I agree on that. Goth hasn't changed that much. It's the music that changed and goth has become mainstream because of bands like Within Temptation etc. In the Netherlands this goth/metal scene is really big nowadays and WT has been our biggest music export pruduct for four years in a row.Josch wrote:I believe that Goth in it´s total has changed trough the years. And yes, there was a lot of influence from the music industry which wanted to enter the market.
They could've been Black Metal, y' know?paul wrote:C'm on, the sisters were goth from 'till '85. I can't believe some people are still in denial about this. Black coats, sunnglasses, graveyard photoshoots, dark and melancholic music, strobelights ... you want me to continue?sultan2075 wrote:Goth? The girls are a little too smart for that. Plus they don't wax romantic about vampires and associated nonsense, thank goodness.
Nowadays they're too smart to let themselves being labeled, but not in those early days ...
That's just Goth for old people. New Wave is old goff for old people that still feel young.paul wrote:How about darkwave?
I've always found it more meaningful and more straightforward than "goth". Just new wave turned dark. Simple.paul wrote:How about darkwave?
... but look oldIzzy HaveMercy wrote:New Wave is old goff for old people that still feel young.