Page 2 of 2
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 13:59
by paul
paul wrote:Ah, well, think the seller is a "victim of circumstance".
... and some (potential) buyers as well ...
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 14:06
by Ozpat
If you count me to one of the two....I'm not pissed
as it is not worth it. If I was I might have used other words.
It's not that important so don'tworry 'bout it.
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 14:13
by 17.auflage
so what...
not imortant enough to worry about. Tried my best and it didn´t work. No reason to cry.
Strange things happen to strange people.
Between: Stonhenge, I am still searching a few of them- PM me! Also blue Floorshow I missed. And there I was a victim...
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 16:09
by Chillburnout
no i didnt count you one of the two,i think it could get clear by reading the threat
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 17:21
by Rise891
I'm not pissed either but L may carry a grudge forever:) It just seems like a lot of wasted time and I still don't have Brothers and Sisters lp.
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 18:00
by taylor
Im pissed
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 19:42
by ribbons69
taylor wrote:the guy that bought the Stonehenge (grünes Vinyl) must to know that I was the first person interested in to buy it. Just before to pay it the seller refused to sell me for to pass another collector for a bigger price, without advise me in any form. This is totally unfair and not professionally correct
I recently put a pic up of my "blue floorshow" 7" and said I was open to offers.Without naming names (hello friends) I received an offer I considered very good,agreed to sell and recieved payment straight away.A couple of hours later I received a bigger offer,what did I do? Honoured the original agreement,anything else would be dishonest and wrong.
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 19:48
by 17.auflage
as time goes by.....
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 19:50
by 17.auflage
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 19:52
by ribbons69
Always! You search for vinyl,I search for shirts.If we had none left to search for,what would we do?
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 20:00
by Victim of Circumstance
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 20:11
by 17.auflage
ribbons69 wrote:
Always! You search for vinyl,I search for shirts.If we had none left to search for,what would we do?
Oh, shirts, yes...nice....
But not the prime target for me....
if I am done with the vinyl, I will start from begin....again.
Posted: 04 Dec 2009, 22:18
by taylor
I recently put a pic up of my "blue floorshow" 7" and said I was open to offers.Without naming names (hello friends) I received an offer I considered very good,agreed to sell and recieved payment straight away.A couple of hours later I received a bigger offer,what did I do? Honoured the original agreement,anything else would be dishonest and wrong.
to difference of others peoples you are 100 % correct
Chillburnout
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 22:37
by Eyes-like-Ice
hi all,
just a few words concerning the seller mentioned above:
i often buy records at ebay, but this seller is outstanding.
very friendly and reliable in contrast to what some of you might say.
today i picked up my promised record.
it was in pristine condition.
of course i took the opportunity to check all the rest of the sisters stuff
if i had to grade it strictly i'd say:
Most of the Covers in VG+ condition and most of the vinyl in near Mint condition.
so if some of you are looking for one of the listed records......
give him a try.
finally i want to say that he is NOT trying to raise prices what he easily could have done.
he is just way unexperienced in selling records.
Cheers, Oliver
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 23:20
by taylor
self promotion
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 23:37
by Eyes-like-Ice
taylor wrote:self promotion
what do you mean?
that i do have two accounts?
know what i think?
you are just pissed off that another got your Stonehenge (not me).
but this does not allow you to discredit certain people.
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 00:00
by Rise891
I'm sure hes heartbroken that instead of having 5,001 Sisters records he only has 5,000.
Your missing the point
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 00:51
by Eyes-like-Ice
and you are the one missing the Brothers and Sisters record?
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 01:06
by taylor
i discredit the non correct people sir, without any problems
find strange that your first post here is in this form
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 02:31
by Chillburnout
i thought most covers were excellent,not just vg+
but by the way vinyl nearly mint is good enough for me
thanks man and i am happy you like your new records
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 03:28
by Rise891
You must know that I am its on the same page
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 06:45
by Eyes-like-Ice
[quote="Chillburnout"]
i thought most covers were excellent,not just vg+
therefore i said strictly
i don't like excellent in terms of grading cause nowadays most of the records at ebay are in exc. condition (according to the seller) which is nonsense.
i think p/g/vg/m and +/- are enough.
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 10:51
by markfiend
I'm not sure what to make of this thread. Can we keep insults, accusations, etc. to a minimum please?
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 12:14
by Chillburnout
all i know for sure,all i know for real is knowing doesnt mean so much...